Li Chun-Ting, Chen Yen-Nien, Chang Chih-Han, Tsai Kuen-Horng
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; Metal Industries Research & Development Centre, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 26;9(11):e113644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113644. eCollection 2014.
To investigate the effects of backward adjustable thoracic support on spinal curvature and back muscle activation during wheelchair sitting.
Twenty elderly people were recruited for this study. The backward adjustable thoracic support sitting posture was compared with the slumped, normal, and lumbar support sitting postures. Spinal curvatures (pelvic, lumbar, and thoracic angles) and muscle activations of 4 back muscles on both sides (maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the lumbar multifidus, lumbar erector spinae, iliocostalis lumborum pars thoracis, and thoracic erector spinae at T9) were measured and compared between the different sitting postures using one-way analysis of variance with repeated measures.
The backward adjustable thoracic support sitting posture showed a relatively neutral pelvic tilt (-0.32±4.80°) when compared with the slumped (22.84±5.27°) and lumbar support (-8.97±3.31°) sitting postures (P<0.001), and showed relatively higher lumbar lordosis (-23.38±6.50°) when compared with the slumped (14.77±7.83°), normal (0.44±7.47°), and lumbar support (-16.76±4.77°) sitting postures (P<0.05). It also showed relatively lower back muscle activity when compared with the normal and lumbar support sitting postures (P<0.05).
The backward adjustable thoracic support sitting concept was suggested because it maintains a more neutral pelvic tilt, higher lumbar lordosis, and lower back muscle activation, which may help maintain a better sitting posture and reduce the risk of back pain.
探讨可向后调节的胸部支撑对轮椅坐姿时脊柱曲度和背部肌肉激活的影响。
招募20名老年人参与本研究。将可向后调节的胸部支撑坐姿与弯腰驼背、正常和腰部支撑坐姿进行比较。测量并比较不同坐姿下的脊柱曲度(骨盆、腰椎和胸椎角度)以及两侧4块背部肌肉的激活情况(腰多裂肌、竖脊肌腰段、胸腰段髂肋肌和T9水平的竖脊肌胸段的最大自主等长收缩),采用重复测量的单因素方差分析。
与弯腰驼背坐姿(22.84±5.27°)和腰部支撑坐姿(-8.97±3.31°)相比,可向后调节的胸部支撑坐姿显示出相对中立的骨盆倾斜度(-0.32±4.80°)(P<0.001);与弯腰驼背坐姿(14.77±7.83°)、正常坐姿(0.44±7.47°)和腰部支撑坐姿(-16.76±4.77°)相比,其腰椎前凸相对更大(-23.38±6.50°)(P<0.05)。与正常和腰部支撑坐姿相比,其背部肌肉活动也相对较低(P<0.05)。
提出可向后调节的胸部支撑坐姿概念,因为它能保持更中立的骨盆倾斜度、更大的腰椎前凸以及更低的背部肌肉激活,这可能有助于保持更好的坐姿并降低背痛风险。