Saj Arnaud, Vocat Roland, Vuilleumier Patrik
Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hospital of Valais, St-Maurice, Martigny and Sierre, Switzerland.
Cortex. 2014 Dec;61:93-106. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.10.017.
Every movement begins with action programming, and ends with a produced effect. Anosognosia for hemiplegia (AH), involving unawareness of motor deficits after brain damage, is a striking but also poorly understood symptom in clinical neurology. It has been suggested that it may result from a combination of cognitive and sensorimotor dysfunctions, including impairments in monitoring motor action and detecting the mismatch between intention and outcome. Here we investigated the relationship between motor action awareness and monitoring of self-produced movements by using a motor imaginary task, which was performed with either the intact or the affected limb. We tested 10 right brain-damaged patients, including 5 with AH, in comparison with 5 healthy controls. In a first phase, participants were asked to either realize or imagine a movement with their right or left arm. In a subsequent recognition phase, the participants had to recall whether the movement was a realized or imagined and which arm was used. AH patients performed significantly worse relative to no-AH patients and healthy controls for the left movements. Specifically, we found that AH patients believed they had realized movements with their (paralyzed) left arm even when they failed in the left execution condition. However, they also made more errors for movements actually realized with the right hand. These findings confirm that impaired action monitoring may contribute to AHP. Furthermore, our results support the notion of an action control system integrating "feedforward" signals through a comparison process between the intention and execution of movement, but also indicate that monitoring deficits in AHP are not strictly unilateral. Combined together, dysfunction of motor comparator processes and more general monitoring deficits may add up to lead to unawareness of paralysis.
每一个动作都始于动作编程,并以产生的效果告终。偏瘫失认症(AH),即脑损伤后对运动缺陷缺乏意识,是临床神经学中一个引人关注但又知之甚少的症状。有人认为,它可能是认知和感觉运动功能障碍共同作用的结果,包括运动动作监测和检测意图与结果之间不匹配方面的损伤。在这里,我们通过使用运动想象任务来研究运动动作意识与自我产生运动的监测之间的关系,该任务使用健全或受影响的肢体来执行。我们测试了10名右脑损伤患者,其中包括5名患有AH的患者,并与5名健康对照者进行了比较。在第一阶段,参与者被要求用右臂或左臂实现或想象一个动作。在随后的识别阶段,参与者必须回忆该动作是实际执行的还是想象的,以及使用的是哪只手臂。对于左侧动作,AH患者的表现明显比非AH患者和健康对照者差。具体而言,我们发现AH患者认为他们用(瘫痪的)左臂实现了动作,即使他们在左侧执行条件下失败了。然而,他们对于右手实际执行的动作也犯了更多错误。这些发现证实,动作监测受损可能导致偏瘫失认症。此外,我们的结果支持这样一种观点,即动作控制系统通过运动意图与执行之间的比较过程整合“前馈”信号,但也表明偏瘫失认症中的监测缺陷并非严格单侧性的。综合起来,运动比较过程功能障碍和更普遍的监测缺陷可能共同导致对瘫痪的无意识。