• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌肝转移患者临床风险分层的新方法。

Novel methods for clinical risk stratification in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

作者信息

Kim Ki-Yeol, Kim Nam Kyu, Cha In-Ho, Ahn Joong Bae, Choi Jin Sub, Choi Gi-Hong, Lim Joon Suk, Lee Kang Young, Baik Seung Hyuk, Min Byung Soh, Hur Hyuk, Roh Jae Kyung, Shin Sang Joon

机构信息

Oral Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Apr;47(2):242-50. doi: 10.4143/crt.2014.066. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

DOI:10.4143/crt.2014.066
PMID:25483744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4398102/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer patients with liver-confined metastases are classified as stage IV, but their prognoses can differ from metastases at other sites. In this study, we suggest a novel method for risk stratification using clinically effective factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on 566 consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) between 1989 and 2010 were analyzed. This analysis was based on principal component analysis (PCA).

RESULTS

The survival rate was affected by carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (p < 0.001; risk ratio, 1.90), distribution of liver metastasis (p=0.014; risk ratio, 1.46), and disease-free interval (DFI; p < 0.001; risk ratio, 1.98). When patients were divided into three groups according to PCA score using significantly affected factors, they showed significantly different survival patterns (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The PCA scoring system based on CEA level, distribution of liver metastasis, and DFI may be useful for preoperatively determining prognoses in order to assist in clinical decisionmaking and designing future clinical trials for CLM treatment.

摘要

目的

患有局限于肝脏转移的结直肠癌患者被归类为IV期,但他们的预后可能与其他部位的转移不同。在本研究中,我们提出了一种使用临床有效因素进行风险分层的新方法。

材料与方法

分析了1989年至2010年间566例连续性结直肠癌肝转移(CLM)患者的数据。该分析基于主成分分析(PCA)。

结果

生存率受癌胚抗原(CEA)水平(p<0.001;风险比,1.90)、肝转移分布(p = 0.014;风险比,1.46)和无病间期(DFI;p<0.001;风险比,1.98)的影响。当根据使用显著影响因素的PCA评分将患者分为三组时,他们表现出显著不同的生存模式(p<0.001)。

结论

基于CEA水平、肝转移分布和DFI的PCA评分系统可能有助于术前确定预后,以协助临床决策并设计未来CLM治疗的临床试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62a3/4398102/6bf46ac1500b/crt-2014-066f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62a3/4398102/17d3df94776b/crt-2014-066f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62a3/4398102/1ea2653f5619/crt-2014-066f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62a3/4398102/6bf46ac1500b/crt-2014-066f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62a3/4398102/17d3df94776b/crt-2014-066f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62a3/4398102/1ea2653f5619/crt-2014-066f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62a3/4398102/6bf46ac1500b/crt-2014-066f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Novel methods for clinical risk stratification in patients with colorectal liver metastases.结直肠癌肝转移患者临床风险分层的新方法。
Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Apr;47(2):242-50. doi: 10.4143/crt.2014.066. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
2
[Prognostic factors for long-term outcome of hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases].[结直肠癌肝转移肝切除术后长期预后的预后因素]
Chir Ital. 2005 Sep-Oct;57(5):555-70.
3
Improved tumour marker sensitivity in detecting colorectal liver metastases by combined type IV collagen and CEA measurement.通过联合检测IV型胶原和癌胚抗原提高检测结直肠癌肝转移的肿瘤标志物敏感性。
Tumour Biol. 2015 Dec;36(12):9839-47. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3729-z. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
4
Clinical relevance of the expression of mRNA of MMP-7, MMP-9, TIMP-1, TIMP-2 and CEA tissue samples from colorectal liver metastases.结直肠肝转移组织样本中MMP - 7、MMP - 9、TIMP - 1、TIMP - 2和CEA的mRNA表达的临床相关性。
Tumour Biol. 2007;28(5):247-52. doi: 10.1159/000110897. Epub 2007 Nov 9.
5
Characteristic differences between patients who have undergone surgical treatment for lung metastasis or hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer.接受过结直肠癌肺转移或肝转移手术治疗的患者之间的特征差异。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Dec;53(6):358-64. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-865758.
6
New clinical scoring system for prognosis of early recurrence of colorectal liver metastases after surgical treatment.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2011 Jul-Aug;58(109):1286-90. doi: 10.5754/hge10045.
7
Preoperative tumor markers as prognostic factors of colorectal liver metastases.术前肿瘤标志物作为结直肠癌肝转移的预后因素。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Mar-Apr;56(90):317-20.
8
[Multivariate regressive analysis of prognosis of liver metastases from colorectal cancer].[结直肠癌肝转移预后的多因素回归分析]
Ai Zheng. 2006 Sep;25(9):1149-52.
9
Identification of patients with high-risk for pulmonary metastases after curative resection of colorectal cancer.结直肠癌根治性切除术后肺转移高危患者的识别。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 May;95 Suppl 5:S86-91.
10
Prediction of prognosis and surgical indications for pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer.结直肠癌肺转移瘤切除术的预后预测及手术指征
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jul;82(1):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.02.027.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Effect of CEA Cut-Off in Patients with Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.癌胚抗原临界值对可切除结直肠癌肝转移患者的预后影响:一项荟萃分析和Meta回归分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 May 13;56(1):117. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01244-6.
2
Differential Perspectives by Specialty on Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Korean Oligometastasis Working Group's Comparative Survey Study.专科医生对寡转移性结直肠癌的不同看法:韩国寡转移工作组的比较调查研究。
Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Oct;55(4):1281-1290. doi: 10.4143/crt.2023.479. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
3
A multi-gene expression profile panel for predicting liver metastasis: An algorithmic approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic scores for colorectal liver metastasis: clinically important or an academic exercise?结直肠癌肝转移的预后评分:临床重要还是学术演练?
HPB (Oxford). 2010 May;12(4):227-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00158.x.
2
Accomplishments in 2008 in the management of curable metastatic colorectal cancer.2008年可治愈转移性结直肠癌的管理成就。
Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2009 Sep;3(5 Supplement 2):S15-22.
3
Validation of prognostic scoring systems for patients undergoing resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases.结直肠癌肝转移患者切除术预后评分系统的验证。
多基因表达谱面板预测肝转移:一种算法方法。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206400. eCollection 2018.
4
Preclinical Efficacy of [V4 Q5 ]dDAVP, a Second Generation Vasopressin Analog, on Metastatic Spread and Tumor-Associated Angiogenesis in Colorectal Cancer.第二代血管加压素类似物[V4 Q5 ]dDAVP 对结直肠癌转移和肿瘤相关血管生成的临床前疗效。
Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;51(2):438-450. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.040. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Dec;16(12):3279-88. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0654-7.
4
Comparison of clinical risk scores predicting prognosis after resection of colorectal liver metastases.预测结直肠癌肝转移切除术后预后的临床风险评分比较
J Surg Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;100(5):349-57. doi: 10.1002/jso.21346.
5
Predictive models in colorectal liver metastases--can we personalize treatment and outcome?结直肠癌肝转移的预测模型——我们能否实现个性化治疗及预后?
Dig Surg. 2008;25(6):406-12. doi: 10.1159/000184731. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
6
A modified grading system for post-hepatectomy metastatic liver cancer originating from colorectal carcinoma.
J Surg Oncol. 2008 Oct 1;98(5):363-70. doi: 10.1002/jso.21114.
7
Analysis of prognostic factors influencing long-term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer.影响转移性结直肠癌肝切除术后长期生存的预后因素分析。
World J Surg. 2008 Jan;32(1):93-103. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9285-y.
8
OncoSurge: a strategy for improving resectability with curative intent in metastatic colorectal cancer.肿瘤外科手术强化治疗(OncoSurge):一种提高转移性结直肠癌根治性切除可能性的策略。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 1;23(28):7125-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.722.
9
Prognostic scoring in colorectal cancer liver metastases: development and validation.结直肠癌肝转移的预后评分:开发与验证
Arch Surg. 2005 Feb;140(2):183-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.2.183.
10
The clinical risk score: emerging as a reliable preoperative prognostic index in hepatectomy for colorectal metastases.临床风险评分:成为结直肠癌肝转移肝切除术前可靠的预后指标。
Arch Surg. 2004 Nov;139(11):1168-72. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.11.1168.