Lenart Brett A, Martens Kelly A, Kearns Kenneth A, Gillespie Robert J, Zoga Adam C, Williams Gerald R
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, Largo, MD, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jun;24(6):915-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.09.044. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
The incidence of failed rotator cuff repairs remains high, especially in the setting of massive tears or revision repairs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient outcomes and repair integrity after augmentation with the repair patch, a poly-l-lactide synthetic polymer.
Sixteen consecutive patients with massive or recurrent rotator cuff tears underwent open repair with synthetic poly-l-lactide patch augmentation. Two patients required the patch to bridge defects, and 1 patient retore after a motor vehicle accident and had revision surgery at another institution. The 13 remaining patients were retrospectively evaluated from 1.2 to 1.7 years (average, 1.5 years) after surgery by PENN, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to examine the integrity of the repair at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up.
The mean age was 57.3 years (42-68 years). Five patients (38%) had an intact rotator cuff at the time of follow-up. The remaining patients (62%) had full-thickness tears. PENN scores significantly improved from a preoperative score of 50.9 to 77.6 (P < .005). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores significantly improved from 32.8 to 74.2 (P = .0001). Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores at latest follow-up were 76.2.
Poly-l-lactide repair patch augmentation of massive and recurrent large to massive rotator cuff tears demonstrates significant improvement in shoulder outcome measures for this difficult population, despite a retear rate of 62%. Further investigation with larger, prospective long-term studies is needed to determine whether this technique provides a true benefit compared with traditional, nonaugmented repair.
肩袖修复失败的发生率仍然很高,尤其是在巨大撕裂或翻修手术的情况下。本研究的目的是评估使用修复补片(一种聚左旋丙交酯合成聚合物)进行增强修复后的患者预后和修复完整性。
16例连续的巨大或复发性肩袖撕裂患者接受了开放性修复,并使用合成聚左旋丙交酯补片进行增强。2例患者需要补片来桥接缺损,1例患者在机动车事故后再次撕裂,并在另一机构接受了翻修手术。对其余13例患者在术后1.2至1.7年(平均1.5年)进行回顾性评估,采用宾夕法尼亚大学(PENN)、美国肩肘外科医师学会(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons)和单评估数字评价(Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation)评分。在至少1年的随访中,使用磁共振成像检查修复的完整性。
平均年龄为57.3岁(42 - 68岁)。5例患者(38%)在随访时肩袖完整。其余患者(62%)有全层撕裂。PENN评分从术前的50.9显著提高到77.6(P <.005)。美国肩肘外科医师学会评分从32.8显著提高到74.2(P =.0001)。最新随访时的单评估数字评价评分为76.2。
对于巨大和复发性大到巨大的肩袖撕裂,使用聚左旋丙交酯修复补片进行增强修复,尽管再撕裂率为62%,但在这一困难人群的肩部预后指标方面显示出显著改善。需要进行更大规模的前瞻性长期研究,以确定与传统的非增强修复相比,该技术是否真的具有优势。