Collinge Cory A, Lebus George F
*Harris Methodist Fort Worth Hospital and John Peter Smith Orthopedic Surgery Residency Program, Fort Worth, TX; and †Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, and the Vanderbilt Orthopaedic Institute, Nashville, TN.
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Feb;29 Suppl 2:S20-4. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000271.
As the anterior intrapelvic approach (AIP or modified Stoppa) has become more popular, its utility has evolved to address specific problems that are not well addressed by the ilioinguinal approach. These include anterior column (AC) fractures associated with medialization of the femoral head (protrusio) and impaction of the superomedial acetabular dome. If left unaddressed, these problems may lead to poor clinical outcomes. The AIP approach, in contrast to the ilioinguinal approach, takes a more direct path to the medial elements of the AC in the true pelvis. This exposure allows access to the impacted dome segment through the displaced AC fracture and wide visualization of the quadrilateral surface, which in turn allows direct reduction and optimal implant placement to neutralize the fracture's deforming forces. The purpose of this article is to discuss the reduction of dome impaction and the quadrilateral surface using the AIP approach.
随着骨盆前路入路(AIP或改良Stoppa入路)越来越受欢迎,其应用范围也不断扩展,以解决髂腹股沟入路难以有效处理的特定问题。这些问题包括与股骨头内移(髋臼前突)及髋臼上内侧穹顶嵌插相关的前柱骨折。若不加以处理,这些问题可能导致临床疗效不佳。与髂腹股沟入路不同,AIP入路在真骨盆中通往髋臼前柱内侧结构的路径更为直接。这种显露方式可通过移位的髋臼前柱骨折进入嵌插的穹顶节段,并广泛显露四边形面,进而能够直接复位并实现最佳的植入物放置,以抵消骨折的变形力。本文旨在探讨采用AIP入路复位穹顶嵌插及显露四边形面的方法。