• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性性兴趣/唤起障碍女性中瑞典语版女性性功能指数(FSFI)的验证

Validation of the Swedish version of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder.

作者信息

Ryding Elsa Lena, Blom Carina

机构信息

Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2015 Feb;12(2):341-9. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12778. Epub 2014 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1111/jsm.12778
PMID:25487161
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) has been validated for use in many countries. It has been used for clinical and research purposes in Sweden, but the reliability and validity of the Swedish version have never been tested.

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the FSFI.

METHODS

After informed consent, 50 women with a diagnosis of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) and 58 age-matched healthy volunteers completed the questionnaires.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Reliability was tested by Cronbach's alpha and test-retest by Pearson's correlation, convergent validity by correlation of the FSFI and the Sexual Function Questionnaire (SFQ), divergent validity by correlation of FSFI and the Symptoms Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), and discriminant validity by Student's t-test and chi-square test to assess differences between women with and without HSDD.

RESULTS

Cronbach's alpha was 0.90-0.96 and test-retest reliability was good (r=0.86-0.93) for all domains in the whole sample; reliability was low for lubrication and pain in the control group. Correlations between all corresponding domains of the FSFI and the SFQ were high for the whole sample (r=0.74-0.87) and moderate to high for both the clinical and the control group. There was no correlation between most FSFI domains and the SCL-90-R. Discriminant validity was very good for each of the FSFI domains (P=0.001, t=7.05-15.58), although the controls reported relatively low scores on the desire domain. The total FSFI score was 31.37 (standard deviation [SD] 2.66) for the clinical group and 17.47 (SD 5.33) for the controls (P=0.001, t=15.99).

CONCLUSION

The Swedish version of the FSFI can be used as a validated and reliable instrument for assessing sexual function in women with HSDD.

摘要

引言

女性性功能指数(FSFI)已在许多国家得到验证可用于临床。它已在瑞典用于临床和研究目的,但瑞典语版本的信度和效度从未经过测试。

目的

本研究的目的是调查瑞典语版FSFI的心理测量特性。

方法

在获得知情同意后,50名被诊断为性欲减退障碍(HSDD)的女性和58名年龄匹配的健康志愿者完成了问卷调查。

主要观察指标

通过Cronbach's α系数检验信度,通过Pearson相关系数检验重测信度,通过FSFI与性功能问卷(SFQ)的相关性检验收敛效度,通过FSFI与症状自评量表-90修订版(SCL-90-R)的相关性检验区分效度,并通过学生t检验和卡方检验评估有无HSDD的女性之间的差异。

结果

整个样本中所有领域的Cronbach's α系数为0.90 - 0.96,重测信度良好(r = 0.86 - 0.93);对照组中润滑和疼痛领域的信度较低。整个样本中FSFI和SFQ所有相应领域之间的相关性较高(r = 0.74 - 0.87),临床组和对照组的相关性为中度至高度。大多数FSFI领域与SCL-90-R之间无相关性。尽管对照组在性欲领域的得分相对较低,但FSFI每个领域的区分效度都非常好(P = 0.001,t = 7.05 - 15.58)。临床组的FSFI总分是31.37(标准差[SD] 2.66),对照组是17.47(SD 5.33)(P = 0.001,t = 15.99)。

结论

瑞典语版FSFI可作为评估患有HSDD女性性功能的经过验证且可靠的工具。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Swedish version of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder.女性性兴趣/唤起障碍女性中瑞典语版女性性功能指数(FSFI)的验证
J Sex Med. 2015 Feb;12(2):341-9. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12778. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
2
Validation of a Women's Sexual Interest Diagnostic Interview--Short Form (WSID-SF) and a Daily Log of Sexual Activities (DLSA) in postmenopausal women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder.验证女性性兴趣诊断访谈-简短版(WSID-SF)和绝经后低性欲障碍女性的性活动日常记录(DLSA)。
J Sex Med. 2010 Feb;7(2 Pt 2):917-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01528.x. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
3
Validation of the female sexual distress scale-revised for assessing distress in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder.用于评估性欲减退障碍女性困扰的女性性困扰量表修订版的效度验证。
J Sex Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00672.x. Epub 2007 Nov 27.
4
The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores.女性性功能指数(FSFI):临床临界值的交叉验证与制定
J Sex Marital Ther. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1):1-20. doi: 10.1080/00926230590475206.
5
Evaluation of the Sexual Desire Relationship Distress Scale (SDRDS) in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder.评估女性性欲低下障碍患者的性欲关系困扰量表(SDRDS)。
J Sex Med. 2012 May;9(5):1344-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02679.x. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
6
Psychometric properties of the Romanian version of the female sexual function index (FSFI-RO).罗马尼亚版女性性功能指数(FSFI-RO)的心理测量特性。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Oct 6;23(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02676-7.
7
Content validity of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in pre- and postmenopausal women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder.绝经前和绝经后性欲减退障碍女性的女性性功能指数(FSFI)的内容效度。
J Sex Med. 2011 Aug;8(8):2237-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02312.x. Epub 2011 May 19.
8
Development and validation of the Polish version of the Female Sexual Function Index in the Polish population of females.波兰女性人群中女性性功能指数波兰语版的制定和验证。
J Sex Med. 2013 Feb;10(2):386-95. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12012. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
9
The Female Sexual Function Index: translation and validation of an Iranian version.女性性功能指数:伊朗版本的翻译和验证。
J Sex Med. 2012 Feb;9(2):514-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02553.x. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
10
The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): validation of the Malay version.女性性功能指数(FSFI):马来语版本的验证
J Sex Med. 2007 Nov;4(6):1642-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00476.x. Epub 2007 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Sexual function and pelvic floor function five years after hysterectomy.子宫切除术后五年的性功能和盆底功能
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 May;104(5):948-957. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15069. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
The effect of sexual health literacy on sexual function mediated by sexual satisfaction and sexual self-efficacy: Structural equation modeling approach.性健康素养通过性满意度和性自我效能感对性功能的影响:结构方程模型方法
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):e0318002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318002. eCollection 2025.
3
Pelvic floor and sexual function 3 years after hysterectomy - A prospective cohort study.
子宫切除术后 3 年的盆底和性功能 - 一项前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Mar;103(3):580-589. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14751. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
4
Predictors of female sexual problems in Shanxi, China: a population-based cross-sectional epidemiologic survey.中国山西女性性问题的预测因素:一项基于人群的横断面流行病学调查。
Sex Med. 2023 Jan 12;11(1):qfac005. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfac005. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Effectiveness of Online Versus Telephone Counseling of Rational-Emotional-Behavioral Therapy on Sexual Function of Women Undergoing Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial:理性情绪行为疗法的在线咨询与电话咨询对接受心脏康复治疗女性性功能的有效性:一项随机临床试验
Galen Med J. 2022 Nov 14;11:e2396. doi: 10.31661/gmj.v11i.2396. eCollection 2022.
6
Effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor function and sexual function-A prospective cohort study.子宫切除术对盆底功能和性功能的影响——一项前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Oct;101(10):1048-1056. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14437. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
7
Psychological Inflexibility as a Predictor of Sexual Functioning Among Women with Vulvovaginal Pain: A Prospective Investigation.心理灵活性作为外阴阴道疼痛女性性功能的预测指标:一项前瞻性调查。
Pain Med. 2020 Dec 25;21(12):3596-3602. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa042.
8
The Female Sexual Function Index: Transculturally Adaptation and Psychometric Validation in Spanish Women.女性性功能指数:西班牙女性中的跨文化适应与心理测量学验证
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 5;17(3):994. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030994.
9
Validation of the Vietnamese Translation Version of the Female Sexual Function Index in Infertile Patients.不育症患者女性性功能指数越南语翻译版本的验证
Sex Med. 2020 Mar;8(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
10
Lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted delivery in nulliparous women: study protocol on a randomised controlled trial.初产妇真空辅助分娩中侧切术与不侧切术对降低产科肛门括约肌损伤的效果比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e025050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025050.