Stolk Arjen, Noordzij Matthijs L, Verhagen Lennart, Volman Inge, Schoffelen Jan-Mathijs, Oostenveld Robert, Hagoort Peter, Toni Ivan
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
Department of Cognitive Psychology and Ergonomics, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands;
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 23;111(51):18183-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414886111. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
How can we understand each other during communicative interactions? An influential suggestion holds that communicators are primed by each other's behaviors, with associative mechanisms automatically coordinating the production of communicative signals and the comprehension of their meanings. An alternative suggestion posits that mutual understanding requires shared conceptualizations of a signal's use, i.e., "conceptual pacts" that are abstracted away from specific experiences. Both accounts predict coherent neural dynamics across communicators, aligned either to the occurrence of a signal or to the dynamics of conceptual pacts. Using coherence spectral-density analysis of cerebral activity simultaneously measured in pairs of communicators, this study shows that establishing mutual understanding of novel signals synchronizes cerebral dynamics across communicators' right temporal lobes. This interpersonal cerebral coherence occurred only within pairs with a shared communicative history, and at temporal scales independent from signals' occurrences. These findings favor the notion that meaning emerges from shared conceptualizations of a signal's use.
在交流互动中,我们如何相互理解?一种有影响力的观点认为,交流者会受到彼此行为的影响,联想机制会自动协调交流信号的产生及其意义的理解。另一种观点则假定,相互理解需要对信号的使用有共同的概念化,即从具体经验中抽象出来的“概念协定”。两种观点都预测交流者之间会出现连贯的神经动力学,要么与信号的出现对齐,要么与概念协定的动态对齐。通过对交流者对同时测量的大脑活动进行相干谱密度分析,本研究表明,对新信号建立相互理解会使交流者右颞叶的大脑动力学同步。这种人际大脑连贯性仅出现在有共同交流历史的配对中,且在与信号出现无关的时间尺度上出现。这些发现支持了意义源于对信号使用的共同概念化这一观点。