Suppr超能文献

交流者之间的大脑连贯性标志着意义的出现。

Cerebral coherence between communicators marks the emergence of meaning.

作者信息

Stolk Arjen, Noordzij Matthijs L, Verhagen Lennart, Volman Inge, Schoffelen Jan-Mathijs, Oostenveld Robert, Hagoort Peter, Toni Ivan

机构信息

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands;

Department of Cognitive Psychology and Ergonomics, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands;

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 23;111(51):18183-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414886111. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

Abstract

How can we understand each other during communicative interactions? An influential suggestion holds that communicators are primed by each other's behaviors, with associative mechanisms automatically coordinating the production of communicative signals and the comprehension of their meanings. An alternative suggestion posits that mutual understanding requires shared conceptualizations of a signal's use, i.e., "conceptual pacts" that are abstracted away from specific experiences. Both accounts predict coherent neural dynamics across communicators, aligned either to the occurrence of a signal or to the dynamics of conceptual pacts. Using coherence spectral-density analysis of cerebral activity simultaneously measured in pairs of communicators, this study shows that establishing mutual understanding of novel signals synchronizes cerebral dynamics across communicators' right temporal lobes. This interpersonal cerebral coherence occurred only within pairs with a shared communicative history, and at temporal scales independent from signals' occurrences. These findings favor the notion that meaning emerges from shared conceptualizations of a signal's use.

摘要

在交流互动中,我们如何相互理解?一种有影响力的观点认为,交流者会受到彼此行为的影响,联想机制会自动协调交流信号的产生及其意义的理解。另一种观点则假定,相互理解需要对信号的使用有共同的概念化,即从具体经验中抽象出来的“概念协定”。两种观点都预测交流者之间会出现连贯的神经动力学,要么与信号的出现对齐,要么与概念协定的动态对齐。通过对交流者对同时测量的大脑活动进行相干谱密度分析,本研究表明,对新信号建立相互理解会使交流者右颞叶的大脑动力学同步。这种人际大脑连贯性仅出现在有共同交流历史的配对中,且在与信号出现无关的时间尺度上出现。这些发现支持了意义源于对信号使用的共同概念化这一观点。

相似文献

1
Cerebral coherence between communicators marks the emergence of meaning.交流者之间的大脑连贯性标志着意义的出现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 23;111(51):18183-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414886111. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
2
Neural mechanisms of communicative innovation.交际创新的神经机制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 3;110(36):14574-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303170110. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
3
Conceptual Alignment: How Brains Achieve Mutual Understanding.概念对齐:大脑如何实现相互理解。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Mar;20(3):180-191. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.11.007. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
4
Understanding communicative actions: a repetitive TMS study.理解交际行为:一项重复经颅磁刺激研究。
Cortex. 2014 Feb;51:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
5
Creating buzz: the neural correlates of effective message propagation.制造热点:有效信息传播的神经关联。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1234-42. doi: 10.1177/0956797612474670. Epub 2013 May 30.
8
The neural mechanisms of reciprocal communication.互惠交流的神经机制。
Brain Res. 2010 Sep 24;1353:159-67. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.066. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
10
Neural correlates of second-language communication and the effect of language anxiety.第二语言交流的神经关联及语言焦虑的影响
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jan;66:182-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.013. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

5
The Emerging Science of Interacting Minds.互动心智的新兴科学。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Mar;19(2):355-373. doi: 10.1177/17456916231200177. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
8
Long gaps between turns are awkward for strangers but not for friends.交谈时如果长时间不接话会让陌生人感到尴尬,但朋友之间不会。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Apr 24;378(1875):20210471. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0471. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

本文引用的文献

3
Understanding communicative actions: a repetitive TMS study.理解交际行为:一项重复经颅磁刺激研究。
Cortex. 2014 Feb;51:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
6
Neural mechanisms of communicative innovation.交际创新的神经机制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 3;110(36):14574-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303170110. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
7
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension.语言产生与理解的统一理论。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):329-47. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12001495. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
9
Sources of variability in human communicative skills.人类交际技能的变异性来源。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Nov 22;6:310. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00310. eCollection 2012.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验