Denyes Mackenzie J, Parisien Michèle A, Rutter Allison, Zeeb Barbara A
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Royal Military College of Canada;
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Royal Military College of Canada.
J Vis Exp. 2014 Nov 28(93):e52183. doi: 10.3791/52183.
The physical and chemical properties of biochar vary based on feedstock sources and production conditions, making it possible to engineer biochars with specific functions (e.g. carbon sequestration, soil quality improvements, or contaminant sorption). In 2013, the International Biochar Initiative (IBI) made publically available their Standardized Product Definition and Product Testing Guidelines (Version 1.1) which set standards for physical and chemical characteristics for biochar. Six biochars made from three different feedstocks and at two temperatures were analyzed for characteristics related to their use as a soil amendment. The protocol describes analyses of the feedstocks and biochars and includes: cation exchange capacity (CEC), specific surface area (SSA), organic carbon (OC) and moisture percentage, pH, particle size distribution, and proximate and ultimate analysis. Also described in the protocol are the analyses of the feedstocks and biochars for contaminants including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), metals and mercury as well as nutrients (phosphorous, nitrite and nitrate and ammonium as nitrogen). The protocol also includes the biological testing procedures, earthworm avoidance and germination assays. Based on the quality assurance / quality control (QA/QC) results of blanks, duplicates, standards and reference materials, all methods were determined adequate for use with biochar and feedstock materials. All biochars and feedstocks were well within the criterion set by the IBI and there were little differences among biochars, except in the case of the biochar produced from construction waste materials. This biochar (referred to as Old biochar) was determined to have elevated levels of arsenic, chromium, copper, and lead, and failed the earthworm avoidance and germination assays. Based on these results, Old biochar would not be appropriate for use as a soil amendment for carbon sequestration, substrate quality improvements or remediation.
生物炭的物理和化学性质因原料来源和生产条件而异,这使得制造具有特定功能(如碳固存、土壤质量改善或污染物吸附)的生物炭成为可能。2013年,国际生物炭倡议组织(IBI)公开了其标准化产品定义和产品测试指南(1.1版),该指南为生物炭的物理和化学特性设定了标准。对由三种不同原料在两种温度下制成的六种生物炭进行了与用作土壤改良剂相关的特性分析。该方案描述了对原料和生物炭的分析,包括:阳离子交换容量(CEC)、比表面积(SSA)、有机碳(OC)和水分百分比、pH值、粒度分布以及近似和最终分析。该方案还描述了对原料和生物炭中污染物的分析,包括多环芳烃(PAHs)、多氯联苯(PCBs)、金属和汞以及养分(磷、亚硝酸盐、硝酸盐和铵态氮)。该方案还包括生物测试程序、蚯蚓回避和发芽试验。根据空白、重复样品、标准品和参考材料的质量保证/质量控制(QA/QC)结果,确定所有方法适用于生物炭和原料材料。所有生物炭和原料均完全符合IBI设定的标准,生物炭之间差异不大,但由建筑废料制成的生物炭除外。这种生物炭(称为旧生物炭)被测定砷、铬、铜和铅含量升高,并且未能通过蚯蚓回避和发芽试验。基于这些结果,旧生物炭不适用于作为碳固存、基质质量改善或修复的土壤改良剂。