• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

触摸屏虚拟键盘的按键大小对生产力、可用性和打字生物力学的影响。

The effect of key size of touch screen virtual keyboards on productivity, usability, and typing biomechanics.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2014 Nov;56(7):1235-48. doi: 10.1177/0018720814531784.

DOI:10.1177/0018720814531784
PMID:25490804
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether different virtual keyboard key sizes affected typing force exposures, muscle activity, wrist posture, comfort, and typing productivity.

BACKGROUND

Virtual keyboard use is increasing and the physical exposures associated with virtual keyboard key sizes are not well documented.

METHOD

Typing forces, forearm/shoulder muscle activity, wrist posture, subjective comfort, and typing productivity were measured from 21 subjects while they were typing on four different virtual keyboards with square key sizes, which were 13, 16, 19, and 22 mm on each side with 2-mm between-key spacing.

RESULTS

The results showed that virtual keyboard key size had little effect on typing force, forearm muscle activity, and ulnar/radial deviation. However, the virtual keyboard with the 13-mm keys had a 15% slower typing speed (p < .0001), slightly higher static (10th percentile) shoulder muscle activity (2% maximum voluntary contractions, p = .0 I), slightly greater wrist extension in both hands (2 degrees to 3 degrees, p <.01), and the lowest subjective comfort and preference ratings (p < .1).

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings indicate that virtual keyboards with a key size less than 16 mm may be too small for touch typing given the slower typing speed, higher static shoulder muscle activity, greater wrist extension, and lowest subjective preferences.

APPLICATIONS

We evaluated the effects of virtual keyboard key sizes on typing force exposures, muscle activity, comfort, and typing productivity.

摘要

目的

我们研究了不同虚拟键盘按键尺寸是否会影响打字力度、肌肉活动、手腕姿势、舒适度和打字效率。

背景

虚拟键盘的使用正在增加,而与虚拟键盘按键尺寸相关的物理暴露情况尚未得到充分记录。

方法

21 名受试者在四种不同的虚拟键盘上打字时,我们测量了他们的打字力度、前臂/肩部肌肉活动、手腕姿势、主观舒适度和打字效率,这些虚拟键盘的方形按键尺寸分别为 13、16、19 和 22 毫米,键与键之间的间隔为 2 毫米。

结果

结果表明,虚拟键盘按键尺寸对打字力度、前臂肌肉活动和尺骨/桡骨偏斜的影响较小。然而,按键尺寸为 13 毫米的虚拟键盘的打字速度慢了 15%(p<.0001),静态(第 10 百分位)肩部肌肉活动略高(2%最大自主收缩,p=.01),双手的手腕伸展度略大(2 度至 3 度,p<.01),且主观舒适度和偏好评分最低(p<.1)。

结论

研究结果表明,由于打字速度较慢、静态肩部肌肉活动较高、手腕伸展度较大以及主观偏好最低,按键尺寸小于 16 毫米的虚拟键盘可能不适合触摸打字。

应用

我们评估了虚拟键盘按键尺寸对打字力度暴露、肌肉活动、舒适度和打字效率的影响。

相似文献

1
The effect of key size of touch screen virtual keyboards on productivity, usability, and typing biomechanics.触摸屏虚拟键盘的按键大小对生产力、可用性和打字生物力学的影响。
Hum Factors. 2014 Nov;56(7):1235-48. doi: 10.1177/0018720814531784.
2
Differences in typing forces, muscle activity, wrist posture, typing performance, and self-reported comfort among conventional and ultra-low travel keyboards.常规和超低行程键盘在打字力度、肌肉活动、手腕姿势、打字性能和自我报告舒适度方面的差异。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Jan;74:10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
3
The effect of keyboard key spacing on typing speed, error, usability, and biomechanics: Part 1.键盘按键间距对打字速度、错误率、可用性和生物力学的影响:第 1 部分。
Hum Factors. 2013 Jun;55(3):557-66. doi: 10.1177/0018720812465005.
4
Differences in typing forces, muscle activity, comfort, and typing performance among virtual, notebook, and desktop keyboards.虚拟键盘、笔记本电脑键盘和台式机键盘在打字力度、肌肉活动、舒适度及打字表现方面的差异。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Nov;45(6):1406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 May 22.
5
The effect of keyboard key spacing on typing speed, error, usability, and biomechanics, Part 2: Vertical spacing.键盘按键间距对打字速度、错误率、可用性和生物力学的影响,第 2 部分:垂直间距。
Hum Factors. 2014 Jun;56(4):752-9. doi: 10.1177/0018720813502524.
6
Influence of virtual keyboard design and usage posture on typing performance and muscle activity during tablet interaction.虚拟键盘设计和使用姿势对平板电脑交互过程中打字性能和肌肉活动的影响。
Ergonomics. 2020 Oct;63(10):1312-1328. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1778097. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
7
Effect of computer keyboard slope on wrist position and forearm electromyography of typists without musculoskeletal disorders.电脑键盘倾斜度对无肌肉骨骼疾病的打字员手腕位置及前臂肌电图的影响。
Phys Ther. 2003 Sep;83(9):816-30.
8
Usage Position and Virtual Keyboard Design Affect Upper-Body Kinematics, Discomfort, and Usability during Prolonged Tablet Typing.使用姿势和虚拟键盘设计对长时间平板打字时的上身运动学、不适感及可用性产生影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 2;10(12):e0143585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143585. eCollection 2015.
9
An evaluation of the ergonomics of three computer keyboards.三款电脑键盘的人体工程学评估。
Ergonomics. 2000 Jan;43(1):55-72. doi: 10.1080/001401300184666.
10
The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures.六种键盘设计对腕部和前臂姿势的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2007 May;38(3):293-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.05.001. Epub 2006 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Commonly Used Subjective Effort Scales May Not Predict Directly Measured Physical Workloads and Fatigue in Hispanic Farmworkers.常用主观努力量表可能无法直接预测西班牙裔农场工人的体力工作负荷和疲劳。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 5;20(4):2809. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042809.
2
Impact of using different-sized touch keyboards on free-text keystroke dynamics authentication in the Arabic language.不同尺寸触摸键盘对阿拉伯语自由文本击键动力学认证的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 23;12(1):15866. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20099-6.
3
The associations of mobile touch screen device use with musculoskeletal symptoms and exposures: A systematic review.
移动触摸屏设备使用与肌肉骨骼症状及暴露的关联:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 7;12(8):e0181220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181220. eCollection 2017.
4
Usage Position and Virtual Keyboard Design Affect Upper-Body Kinematics, Discomfort, and Usability during Prolonged Tablet Typing.使用姿势和虚拟键盘设计对长时间平板打字时的上身运动学、不适感及可用性产生影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 2;10(12):e0143585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143585. eCollection 2015.