Pilcher Jennifer, Kruske Sue, Barclay Lesley
University Centre for Rural Health, University of Sydney, Uralba st, Lismore, NSW, Australia.
University Centre for Mothers and Babies, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 10;14:548. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0548-7.
Policy informs the planning and delivery of rural and remote maternity services and influences the perinatal outcomes of the 30 per cent of Australian women and their babies who live outside the major cities. Currently however, there are no planning tools that identify the optimal level of birthing services for rural and remote communities in Australia. To address this, the Australian government has prioritised the development of a rigorous methodology in the Australian National Maternity Services Plan to inform the planning of rural and remote maternity services.
A review of the literature was undertaken to identify planning indexes with component variables as outlined in the Australian National Maternity Services Plan. The indexes were also relevant if they described need associated with a specific type and level of health service in rural and remote areas of high income countries. Only indexes that modelled a range of socioeconomic and or geographical variables, identified access or need for a specific service type in rural and remote communities were included in the review.
Four indexes, two Australian and two Canadian met the inclusion criteria. They used combinations of variables including: geographical placement of services; isolation from services and socioeconomic vulnerability to identify access to a type and level of health service in rural and remote areas within 60 minutes. Where geographic isolation reduces access to services for high needs populations, additional measures of disadvantage including indigeneity could strengthen vulnerability scores.
Current planning indexes are applicable for the development of an Australian rural birthing index. The variables in each of the indexes were relevant, however use of flexible sized catchments to accurately account for population births and weighting for extreme geographic isolation needs to be considered. Additionally, socioeconomic variables are required that will reflect need for services particularly for isolated high needs populations. These variables could be used with Australian data and appropriate cut-off points to confirm applicability for maternity services. All of the indexes used similar types of variables and are relevant for the development of an Australian Rural Birth Index.
政策为农村和偏远地区的孕产妇服务规划与提供提供指导,并影响着30%居住在澳大利亚主要城市以外的妇女及其婴儿的围产期结局。然而,目前尚无规划工具可确定澳大利亚农村和偏远社区分娩服务的最佳水平。为解决这一问题,澳大利亚政府已将制定严谨方法列为澳大利亚国家孕产妇服务计划的优先事项,以指导农村和偏远地区孕产妇服务的规划。
对文献进行综述,以确定澳大利亚国家孕产妇服务计划中概述的具有组成变量的规划指标。如果这些指标描述了高收入国家农村和偏远地区与特定类型和水平的卫生服务相关的需求,那么它们也是相关的。本综述仅纳入对一系列社会经济和/或地理变量进行建模、确定农村和偏远社区对特定服务类型的可及性或需求的指标。
四个指标符合纳入标准,其中两个来自澳大利亚,两个来自加拿大。它们使用了多种变量组合,包括:服务的地理位置;与服务的隔离程度以及社会经济脆弱性,以确定在60分钟内农村和偏远地区获得某种类型和水平卫生服务的情况。当地理隔离减少了高需求人群获得服务的机会时,包括原住民身份在内的其他劣势衡量指标可加强脆弱性得分。
当前的规划指标适用于澳大利亚农村分娩指数的制定。每个指标中的变量都是相关的,然而,需要考虑使用灵活规模的集水区来准确统计人口出生情况,以及对极端地理隔离进行加权。此外,还需要社会经济变量来反映对服务的需求,特别是对孤立的高需求人群的服务需求。这些变量可与澳大利亚的数据及适当的临界点一起使用,以确认对孕产妇服务的适用性。所有指标都使用了类似类型的变量,并且与澳大利亚农村分娩指数的制定相关。