Goksugur S B, Kabakus N, Bekdas M, Demircioglu F
Department of Pediatrics, Medical Faculty, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014 Nov;18(22):3380-5.
Febrile seizures (FS) are the most common neurological emergency in childhood. They are divided into two groups accordingly clinical features, simple febrile seizure and complex febrile seizure. Until now laboratory tests have not been used as a parameter of classification of them. The objective of this study is to estimate the usefulness of the hematogical parameters especially neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and red blood cell distribution width (RDW) in the differentiation of febrile seizure types.
A retrospective review was conducted on patients from 6 months to 6 years old presenting with first febrile seizure admitted to a tertiary care hospital. Epidemiological and laboratory variables of the patients were collected.
The mean NLR in the simple FS and complex FS groups was 2.18±1.9 and 3.8±4.2 respectively, and the difference was significant (p=0.024). The mean serum red blood cell distribution width in the simple FS and complex FS groups was 16.1±1.1 and 16.6±0.8 respectively, and the difference was significant (p=0.019). NLR and RDW values in complex FS patients were statistically higher than simple febrile patients. ROC analysis showed that if the chosen cut-off point for NLR is 1.98 the sensitivity and specificity are 66.7% and 60.3% respectively. These were statistically significant (p=0.040 AUC 0.623, CI 0.503-0.743). If the chosen cut-off point for RDW is 16.350, the sensitivity and specificity are 59.0% and 58.6%, respectively. These were statistically significant (p=0.037 AUC 0.626, CI 0.515-0.736) too.
NLR and RDW were simple, effective and practical predictors for differentiation of FS types. They will have potential values in public health practice for management of FS patients.
热性惊厥(FS)是儿童期最常见的神经系统急症。根据临床特征,热性惊厥分为两组,即单纯性热性惊厥和复杂性热性惊厥。迄今为止,实验室检查尚未用作热性惊厥分类的参数。本研究的目的是评估血液学参数,尤其是中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和红细胞分布宽度(RDW)在热性惊厥类型鉴别中的作用。
对一家三级医院收治的6个月至6岁首次发生热性惊厥的患者进行回顾性研究。收集患者的流行病学和实验室变量。
单纯性FS组和复杂性FS组的平均NLR分别为2.18±1.9和3.8±4.2,差异有统计学意义(p=0.024)。单纯性FS组和复杂性FS组的平均血清红细胞分布宽度分别为16.1±1.1和16.6±0.8,差异有统计学意义(p=0.019)。复杂性FS患者的NLR和RDW值在统计学上高于单纯热性惊厥患者。ROC分析显示,如果选择NLR的截断点为1.98,则敏感性和特异性分别为66.7%和60.3%。这些差异有统计学意义(p=0.040,AUC 0.623,CI 0.503 - 0.743)。如果选择RDW的截断点为16.350,则敏感性和特异性分别为59.0%和58.6%。这些差异也有统计学意义(p=0.037,AUC 0.626,CI 0.515 - 0.736)。
NLR和RDW是鉴别热性惊厥类型的简单、有效且实用的预测指标。它们在热性惊厥患者管理的公共卫生实践中具有潜在价值。