• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

炎症标志物和计算渗透压在热性惊厥分类中的作用。

The role of inflammatory markers and calculated osmotic pressure in the classification of febrile seizures.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Atsugi City Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Nov;24(21):11187-11191. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202011_23606.

DOI:10.26355/eurrev_202011_23606
PMID:33215436
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Systemic inflammatory response may contribute to the onset of febrile seizures (FSs). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been reported to be useful for differentiating simple and complex FSs in children with a first FS. This study aimed to determine whether easily measurable inflammatory markers were useful for distinguishing between the types of FSs in children with FSs not limited to the first FS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of children aged 6-60 months who were presented to the Atsugi City Hospital in Japan for the treatment of FSs between December 2018 and February 2020. A complex FS was defined as a seizure with multiple seizures during the same febrile illness, prolonged seizures and/or focal seizures. A simple FS was defined as a seizure without the characteristics of complex FS. We assessed complete blood count, C-reactive protein, and calculated osmotic pressure.

RESULTS

A total of 205 children with FSs (simple, 139; complex, 66) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. None of the inflammatory markers, including NLR, could predict the FS type. The median osmotic pressure was 279.0, 278.8, 283.3, and 278.3 mOsm/kg H2O for children with simple, multiple, prolonged, and focal seizures, respectively. Children with prolonged seizures had a significantly higher calculated osmotic pressure than those with simple FSs (p<0.001) and multiple seizures during the same febrile illness (p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Easily measurable inflammatory markers, including NLR, were not useful for distinguishing between types of FSs in children. Large multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the association between osmotic pressure and FS.

摘要

目的

全身炎症反应可能与热性惊厥(FS)的发作有关。有报道称,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)有助于区分首次 FS 患儿的单纯性和复杂性 FS。本研究旨在确定是否可通过易于测量的炎症标志物区分 FS 患儿的 FS 类型,而不限于首次 FS。

患者和方法

我们对 2018 年 12 月至 2020 年 2 月期间在日本厚木市医院就诊的年龄为 6-60 个月的 FS 患儿进行了回顾性研究。复杂 FS 定义为同一发热性疾病中出现多次发作、发作持续时间延长和/或局灶性发作的惊厥。单纯性 FS 定义为无复杂 FS 特征的惊厥。我们评估了全血细胞计数、C 反应蛋白,并计算了渗透压。

结果

共有 205 例 FS 患儿(单纯性 FS,139 例;复杂性 FS,66 例)符合纳入标准。包括 NLR 在内的任何炎症标志物均不能预测 FS 类型。单纯性、多次发作、发作持续时间延长和局灶性发作的儿童的渗透压中位数分别为 279.0、278.8、283.3 和 278.3 mOsm/kg H2O。发作持续时间延长的患儿的渗透压明显高于单纯性 FS 患儿(p<0.001)和同一次发热性疾病中出现多次发作的患儿(p=0.004)。

结论

包括 NLR 在内的易于测量的炎症标志物对区分 FS 患儿的 FS 类型没有帮助。需要进行大型多中心研究来评估渗透压与 FS 之间的关联。

相似文献

1
The role of inflammatory markers and calculated osmotic pressure in the classification of febrile seizures.炎症标志物和计算渗透压在热性惊厥分类中的作用。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Nov;24(21):11187-11191. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202011_23606.
2
The role of Mean Platelet Volume/platelet count Ratio and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio on the risk of Febrile Seizure.血小板平均体积/血小板计数比值和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与热性惊厥风险的关系。
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 11;8(1):15123. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33373-3.
3
Risk factors for acute encephalitis and early seizure recurrence in complex febrile seizures.复杂性热性惊厥患者发生急性脑炎和早期癫痫复发的危险因素。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Aug;181(8):3103-3110. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04529-1. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
4
Serum HMGB1 in febrile seizures.热性惊厥患者血清 HMGB1。
Epilepsy Res. 2024 Jul;203:107381. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107381. Epub 2024 May 10.
5
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and red blood cell distribution width is a practical predictor for differentiation of febrile seizure types.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及红细胞分布宽度是热性惊厥类型鉴别的实用预测指标。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014 Nov;18(22):3380-5.
6
[Evaluating a child after a febrile seizure: Insights on three important issues].[热性惊厥后评估儿童:关于三个重要问题的见解]
Arch Pediatr. 2017 Nov;24(11):1137-1146. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
7
Postvaccination Febrile Seizure Severity and Outcome.疫苗接种后热性惊厥严重程度和结局。
Pediatrics. 2019 May;143(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2120.
8
Febrile seizures: an epidemiological and outcome study of 482 cases.热性惊厥:482例病例的流行病学及转归研究
Childs Nerv Syst. 2012 Oct;28(10):1779-84. doi: 10.1007/s00381-012-1789-6. Epub 2012 May 9.
9
Distribution of febrile seizure duration and associations with development.热性惊厥持续时间的分布及其与发育的关系。
Ann Neurol. 2011 Jul;70(1):93-100. doi: 10.1002/ana.22368. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
10
A preliminary study on the association between prognostic nutritional index and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio with nutritional status and inflammation in febrile children's susceptibility to seizures.发热儿童易发生惊厥与其营养状态和炎症相关的预后营养指数与中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值的初步研究
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024 Jul 19;70(7):e20240166. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20240166. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of recurrent febrile seizures risk during the same febrile illness in children at a single tertiary centre in Turkiye.土耳其一家三级中心对儿童同一发热性疾病期间复发性热性惊厥风险的预测
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Jun 3;9(1):e002908. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002908.
2
Diagnostic Value of IL-4, IL-10, and Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio in Febrile Seizures During Viral Epidemic Period.病毒流行期间白细胞介素-4、白细胞介素-10及中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值在热性惊厥中的诊断价值
Mol Neurobiol. 2025 May;62(5):6102-6111. doi: 10.1007/s12035-024-04665-9. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
3
Predictive Value of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Other Inflammation Indices in Febrile Seizures in Children.
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及其他炎症指标对小儿热性惊厥的预测价值
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 9;13(17):5330. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175330.
4
Comprehensive Evaluation of Inflammatory Biomarkers and Osmolarity to Distinguish Simple and Complex Febrile Seizures in Children.炎症生物标志物和渗透压综合评估以区分儿童单纯性和复杂性热性惊厥
Children (Basel). 2023 Sep 24;10(10):1594. doi: 10.3390/children10101594.
5
The Impact of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Febrile Seizures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值与热性惊厥的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Oct 11;2022:8472795. doi: 10.1155/2022/8472795. eCollection 2022.
6
The baseline risk of multiple febrile seizures in the same febrile illness: a meta-analysis.同一发热疾病中多次热性惊厥的基线风险:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Jun;181(6):2201-2213. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04431-w. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
7
The Predictive Value of Hemocytometry Based on Peripheral Platelet-Related Parameters in Identifying the Causes of Febrile Seizures.基于外周血血小板相关参数的血细胞计数法在热性惊厥病因鉴别中的预测价值
J Inflamm Res. 2021 Oct 18;14:5381-5392. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S334165. eCollection 2021.