Lee Jessica, Papic Melissa, Baldauf Erin, Updike Glenn, Schwarz E Bimla
University of Pittsburgh, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences.
University of Pittsburgh, Department of Medicine.
Contraception. 2015 Feb;91(2):143-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
To assess how a checklist reminding clinicians to deliver a bundled intervention affects contraceptive knowledge and use 3 months after women seek walk-in pregnancy testing.
Pre-intervention, an inner-city family planning clinic provided unstructured care; during the intervention period, clinic staff used a checklist to ensure women received needed services. Women seeking walk-in pregnancy testing who wished to avoid pregnancy for at least 6 months were asked to complete surveys about their contraceptive knowledge and use immediately after and 3-months after visiting the study clinic. To assess the significance of changes over time, we used logistic regression models.
Between January 2011 and May 2013, over 1500 women sought pregnancy testing from the study clinic; 323 completed surveys (95 pre-intervention and 228 during the intervention period). With this checklist intervention, participants were more likely to receive emergency contraception (EC) (22% vs. 5%, [aOR 4.66 (1.76-12.35)], [corrected] have an intrauterine device or implant placed at the time of their clinic visit (5% vs. 0%, p=0.02), or receive a contraceptive prescription (23% vs. 10%, p<0.001). Three months after visiting the study clinic, participants from the intervention period were more knowledgeable about intrauterine and subdermal contraception and were more likely to report at 3-month follow-up a method of contraception more effective than the method they used prior to seeking pregnancy testing from the study clinic (aOR=2.02, 95% CI=1.03-3.96). The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused. [corrected].
Women seeking walk-in pregnancy testing appear more likely to receive EC and to have switched to a more effective form of birth control in the 3 months following their visit when clinic staff used a 3-item checklist and provided scripted counseling.
A checklist reminding clinic staff to assess pregnancy intentions, provide scripted counseling about both emergency and highly-effective reversible contraception, and offer same-day contraceptive initiation to women seeking walk-in pregnancy testing appears to increase use of more effective contraception.
评估一份提醒临床医生实施综合干预措施的清单,对女性进行即时妊娠检测3个月后避孕知识和避孕措施使用情况的影响。
干预前,一家市中心的计划生育诊所提供非结构化护理;在干预期间,诊所工作人员使用清单以确保女性获得所需服务。寻求即时妊娠检测且希望至少6个月内避免怀孕的女性,在就诊研究诊所后立即以及3个月后被要求完成关于其避孕知识和避孕措施使用情况的调查。为评估随时间变化的显著性,我们使用了逻辑回归模型。
在2011年1月至2013年5月期间,超过1500名女性到研究诊所进行妊娠检测;323人完成了调查(干预前95人,干预期间228人)。通过这种清单干预,参与者更有可能接受紧急避孕(EC)(22%对5%,[调整后比值比4.66(1.76 - 12.35)]),[校正后]在诊所就诊时放置宫内节育器或植入物(5%对0%,p = 0.02),或获得避孕处方(23%对10%,p < 0.001)。在就诊研究诊所3个月后,干预期间的参与者对宫内和皮下避孕方法的了解更多,并且在3个月随访时更有可能报告采用了一种比她们在从研究诊所寻求妊娠检测之前使用的方法更有效的避孕方法(调整后比值比 = 2.02,95%置信区间 = 1.03 - 3.96)。作者对由此造成的任何不便表示歉意。[校正后]
当诊所工作人员使用包含三项内容的清单并提供书面咨询时,寻求即时妊娠检测的女性在就诊后的3个月内似乎更有可能接受紧急避孕,并转而采用更有效的避孕方式。
一份提醒诊所工作人员评估妊娠意愿、提供关于紧急和高效可逆避孕的书面咨询,并为寻求即时妊娠检测的女性提供当日避孕措施启动服务的清单,似乎会增加更有效避孕措施的使用。