Zou Li-Qun, Zhang Bing-Lan, Chang Qing, Zhu Fu-Ping, Li Yan-Yan, Wei Yu-Quan, Guan Yong-Song
Li-Qun Zou, Bing-Lan Zhang, Yan-Yan Li, Yu-Quan Wei, Yong-Song Guan, Department of Oncology, Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 7;20(45):17227-34. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.17227.
AIM: To compare transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with TACE monotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: We searched all the eligible studies from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, Embase, and CNKI. The meta-analysis was performed to assess the survival benefit, tumor response, and the decline in α-fetoprotein (AFP) level. According to the heterogeneity of the studies, pooled OR with 95%CI were calculated using the fixed-effects or random-effects model. An observed OR > 1 indicated that the addition of 3D-CRT to TACE offered survival benefits to patients that could be considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager Software. RESULTS: Ten studies met the criteria to perform a meta-analysis including 908 HCC participants, with 400 patients in the TACE/3D-CRT combination group and 508 in the TACE alone group. TACE combined with 3D-CRT significantly improved 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival compared with TACE monotherapy (OR = 1.87, 95%CI: 1.37-2.55, P < 0.0001), (OR = 2.38, 95%CI: 1.78-3.17, P < 0.00001) and (OR = 2.97, 95%CI: 2.10-4.21, P < 0.00001). In addition, TACE plus 3D-CRT was associated with a higher tumor response (complete remission and partial remission) (OR = 3.81; 95%CI: 2.70-5.37; P < 0.00001), and decline rates of AFP level (OR = 3.24, 95%CI: 2.09-5.02, P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrated that TACE combined with 3D-CRT was better than TACE monotherapy for patients with HCC, which needs to be confirmed by large multicenter trials.
目的:比较经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)联合三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)与单纯TACE治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的效果。 方法:我们检索了Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Medline、Embase和中国知网中所有符合条件的研究。进行荟萃分析以评估生存获益、肿瘤反应以及甲胎蛋白(AFP)水平的下降情况。根据研究的异质性,使用固定效应或随机效应模型计算合并的OR值及95%置信区间(CI)。观察到的OR>1表明TACE联合3D-CRT为患者带来的生存获益具有统计学意义。使用Review Manager软件进行统计分析。 结果:十项研究符合进行荟萃分析的标准,共纳入908例HCC患者,其中TACE/3D-CRT联合治疗组400例,单纯TACE组508例。与单纯TACE治疗相比,TACE联合3D-CRT显著提高了1年、2年和3年总生存率(OR=1.87,95%CI:1.37-2.55,P<0.0001)、(OR=2.38,95%CI:1.78-3.17,P<0.00001)和(OR=2.97,95%CI:2.10-4.21,P<0.00001)。此外,TACE联合3D-CRT具有更高的肿瘤反应率(完全缓解和部分缓解)(OR=3.81;95%CI:2.70-5.37;P<0.00001)以及AFP水平下降率(OR=3.24,95%CI:2.09-5.02,P<0.00001)。 结论:本荟萃分析表明,TACE联合3D-CRT治疗HCC患者的效果优于单纯TACE治疗,这需要大型多中心试验予以证实。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014-12-7
World J Gastroenterol. 2014-12-7
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011-5-27
World J Gastroenterol. 2013-6-28
Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2018
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-3-7
World J Gastroenterol. 2016-8-14
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2015-9-2
World J Gastroenterol. 2013-6-28
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011-3-16
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011-2-4