Yoon Jeong Hee, Lee Jeong Min, Klotz Ernst, Jeon Ju Hyun, Lee Kyung-Bun, Han Joon Koo, Choi Byung Ihn
From the *Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, †Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine; ‡Siemens Healthcare; and §Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Invest Radiol. 2015 Apr;50(4):290-6. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000123.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether hepatic extracellular volume fractions (fECVs) measured using multiphasic liver computed tomography (CT) can be used to quantify the severity of hepatic fibrosis (HF).
This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. A total of 141 patients (male-female ratio, 109:32; mean [SD] age, 59.4 [11.4] years) histologically diagnosed with HF (F0-F1 = 33 and F2-F4 = 108) underwent multiphasic liver CT. Absolute enhancements (in Hounsfield unit) of the liver parenchyma (Eliver) and aorta (Eaorta) 3 minutes after contrast administration were measured on subtraction images of precontrast and equilibrium phase scans using nonrigid registration software. The fECV was calculated using the following equation: fECV (%) = Eliver/Eaorta × (100 - Hematocrit [%]). Correlation between fECV and HF stage was evaluated using the Spearman correlation coefficient. The fECVs were compared between F0-F1 and ≥F2 as well as between child A and child B or C. Diagnostic performance of fECV in predicting significant HF (≥F2) was assessed using receiver operating curve analysis.
The fECVs showed a significant correlation with pathologic HF staging (r = 0.493, P < 0.001). The F2-F4 showed significantly higher fECVs than did F0 to F1 (33.6% [4.7%] vs 27.7% [4.4%]; P < 0.001). The fECVs were significantly higher in the patients with child B or C than those with child A (35.2% [7.0%] vs 31.3% [4.2%]; P < 0.001). The fECV values higher than 28.76% provided 87.5% sensitivity and 71.0% specificity in detecting significant HF (area under the curve, 0.832; P < 0.0001).
Because fECV was shown to increase along with HF progression, the estimation of fECV using routine multiphasic liver CT may have the potential to detect significant HF.
本研究旨在确定使用多期肝脏计算机断层扫描(CT)测量的肝脏细胞外体积分数(fECV)是否可用于量化肝纤维化(HF)的严重程度。
本回顾性研究经我院机构审查委员会批准,无需知情同意。共有141例经组织学诊断为HF的患者(男女比例为109:32;平均[标准差]年龄为59.4[11.4]岁)(F0 - F1 = 33例,F2 - F4 = 108例)接受了多期肝脏CT检查。使用非刚性配准软件,在造影前和平衡期扫描的减影图像上测量造影剂注射3分钟后肝实质(Eliver)和主动脉(Eaorta)的绝对增强(以亨氏单位计)。fECV使用以下公式计算:fECV(%)=Eliver/Eaorta×(100 - 血细胞比容[百分比])。使用Spearman相关系数评估fECV与HF分期之间的相关性。比较F0 - F1组与≥F2组以及Child A组与Child B或C组之间的fECV。使用受试者工作特征曲线分析评估fECV预测显著HF(≥F2)的诊断性能。
fECV与病理HF分期显著相关(r = 0.493,P < 0.001)。F2 - F4组的fECV显著高于F0至F1组(33.6%[4.7%]对27.7%[4.4%];P < 0.001)。Child B或C组患者的fECV显著高于Child A组患者(35.2%[7.0%]对31.3%[4.2%];P < 0.001)。fECV值高于28.76%时,检测显著HF的敏感性为87.5%,特异性为71.0%(曲线下面积为0.832;P < 0.0001)。
由于fECV显示随HF进展而增加,因此使用常规多期肝脏CT估计fECV可能具有检测显著HF的潜力。