Segal Courtney, Holve Erin
Research & Education in Health Services Research, AcademyHealth, 1150 17th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Nov;3(6):647-55. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.71.
The Recovery Act provided a substantial, one-time investment in data infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research (CER). A review of the publications, data, and tools developed as a result of this support has informed understanding of the level of effort undertaken by these projects. Structured search queries, as well as outreach efforts, were conducted to identify and review resources from American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 CER projects building electronic clinical data infrastructure. The findings from this study provide a spectrum of productivity across a range of topics and settings. A total of 451 manuscripts published in 192 journals, and 141 data resources and tools were identified and address gaps in evidence on priority populations, conditions, and the infrastructure needed to support CER.
《复苏法案》为比较效果研究(CER)的数据基础设施提供了一笔可观的一次性投资。对因这种支持而开发的出版物、数据和工具进行审查,有助于了解这些项目所付出的努力程度。我们进行了结构化搜索查询以及推广工作,以识别和审查2009年《美国复苏与再投资法案》中建立电子临床数据基础设施的CER项目的资源。这项研究的结果展现了一系列主题和环境下的生产力状况。共在192种期刊上发表了451篇手稿,识别出了141种数据资源和工具,这些资源和工具填补了关于重点人群、病症以及支持CER所需基础设施的证据空白。