Curmi Claire, Peters Kath, Salamonson Yenna
School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
BMC Womens Health. 2014 Dec 12;14:153. doi: 10.1186/s12905-014-0153-2.
Cervical cancer is the third most prevalent cancer in women, and since the introduction of the Papanicolaou test (Pap test or Pap smear), the incidence of cervical cancer and mortality rates worldwide have declined substantially. However significant disparities have been identified between the cervical screening rates of heterosexual and lesbian women. This study explores the attitudes and practices that lesbians have towards cervical cancer screening and aims to identify why such disparities occur.
A qualitative methodology based on feminist perspectives was used to collect narrative data from lesbians about their attitudes and practices of cervical screening through the use of semi structured interviews. Nine women who self-identified as lesbian that were living in New South Wales were recruited for the study. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach.
Four main themes emerged from the data namely: Encountering cervical cancer: "my friends had some early cancer cells detected", Misconceptions related to risk: "I am a lesbian I don't need one", Imposed screening: "It's a requirement of IVF treatment" and, Promoting cervical screening: "I think it should be spoken about in schools".
Consistent with the literature, the findings show that the majority of these women do not undertake cervical screening at the recommended rate. This study highlights the multiple and complex issues related to cervical cancer screening for lesbians, mainly through misconceptions and underestimation of risk. Specific and targeted educational and promotional strategies are required for both lesbians and health professionals to enhance cervical cancer screening rates for lesbians in Australia.
宫颈癌是女性中第三大常见癌症,自从巴氏涂片检查(巴氏试验或巴氏涂片)问世以来,全球宫颈癌的发病率和死亡率大幅下降。然而,已发现异性恋女性和女同性恋者的宫颈筛查率存在显著差异。本研究探讨女同性恋者对宫颈癌筛查的态度和做法,旨在确定为何会出现这种差异。
采用基于女权主义视角的定性方法,通过半结构化访谈收集女同性恋者关于其宫颈筛查态度和做法的叙述性数据。招募了九名自称女同性恋且居住在新南威尔士州的女性参与该研究。访谈进行数字录音并逐字转录。数据采用主题分析方法进行分析。
数据中出现了四个主要主题,即:遭遇宫颈癌:“我的朋友检测出了一些早期癌细胞”、与风险相关的误解:“我是女同性恋者,我不需要筛查”、强制筛查:“这是体外受精治疗的一项要求”以及,推广宫颈筛查:“我认为学校应该讲授这个”。
与文献一致,研究结果表明,这些女性中的大多数未按照推荐的比率进行宫颈筛查。本研究突出了与女同性恋者宫颈癌筛查相关的多重复杂问题,主要是通过误解和对风险的低估。需要为女同性恋者和卫生专业人员制定具体且有针对性的教育和推广策略,以提高澳大利亚女同性恋者的宫颈癌筛查率。