DeYonker Nathan J
Department of Chemistry, The University of Memphis , Memphis, Tennessee 38152, United States.
J Phys Chem A. 2015 Jan 8;119(1):215-23. doi: 10.1021/jp5110906. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
Formidable multireference character is known to exist in the quartet states of the neutral radicals iron monocyanide (FeCN) and iron monoisocyanide (FeNC), even more so than the controversial FeH radical (which is now definitively known to have a (4)Δ ground electronic state). In the initial theoretical study, it was found that the gas phase adiabatic (4)Δ ← (6)Δ transition energy plummeted with improving treatment of dynamical correlation, and final results suggested that FeCN ((4)Δ) and FeNC ((6)Δ) isomers have different ground electronic states. The (4)Δ ground state for FeCN has been since verified experimentally. In this work, an ab initio composite method employing coupled cluster theory up to full quadruple excitations (CCSDTQ) and large basis set CCSDT computations is compared to multireference configuration interaction (MRCI) energies at a level of sophistication far superior to the 2004 study [ DeYonker et al. J. Chem. Phys. 2004 , 120 , 4726 ]. Despite advances in the treatment of scalar relativistic effects, improved iron basis sets, and massive increases in computer processing power over the past decade, multireference methodologies still fail to find the correct ground state for FeCN, with large basis set MRCISD+Q results providing a qualitatively poor adiabatic (4)Δ ← (6)Δ transition energy, in error by nearly 5000 cm(-1). Coupled cluster theory with post-CCSD(T) additive corrections produces the (4)Δ FeCN ground state, with the (6)Δ state only 306 cm(-1) higher in energy. The ground electronic state of FeNC is computed to be (6)Δ and is only 45 cm(-1) higher in energy than the (4)Δ FeCN state while it is 741 cm(-1) lower in energy than the FeNC (4)Δ excited state. Surprisingly, an additional CCSDT additive correction for core-valence correlation shifts the FeNC transition energy in favor of a (4)Δ ground state, with a (4)Δ ← (6)Δ Te of 227 cm(-1).
已知中性自由基氰化铁(FeCN)和异氰化铁(FeNC)的四重态中存在强大的多参考特征,甚至比有争议的FeH自由基(现在已明确知道其基电子态为(4)Δ)还要明显。在最初的理论研究中,发现随着动力学相关处理的改进,气相绝热(4)Δ←(6)Δ跃迁能量急剧下降,最终结果表明FeCN((4)Δ)和FeNC((6)Δ)异构体具有不同的基电子态。此后,FeCN的(4)Δ基态已通过实验验证。在这项工作中,将一种采用耦合簇理论直至完全四重激发(CCSDTQ)和大基组CCSDT计算的从头算复合方法与多参考组态相互作用(MRCI)能量进行了比较,其复杂程度远高于2004年的研究[DeYonker等人,《化学物理杂志》2004年,120卷,4726页]。尽管在标量相对论效应处理、改进的铁基组以及过去十年计算机处理能力大幅提升方面取得了进展,但多参考方法仍然无法找到FeCN的正确基态,大基组MRCISD+Q结果给出的绝热(4)Δ←(6)Δ跃迁能量在定性上很差,误差近5000 cm(-1)。带有后CCSD(T)附加校正的耦合簇理论产生了(4)Δ的FeCN基态,(6)Δ态的能量仅高306 cm(-1)。计算得出FeNC的基电子态为(6)Δ,其能量仅比(4)Δ的FeCN态高45 cm(-1),而比FeNC的(4)Δ激发态低741 cm(-1)。令人惊讶的是,对芯价相关的额外CCSDT附加校正使FeNC的跃迁能量偏向于(4)Δ基态,(4)Δ←(6)Δ的Te为227 cm(-1)。