Ma Jun, Strub Peg, Xiao Lan, Lavori Philip W, Camargo Carlos A, Wilson Sandra R, Gardner Christopher D, Buist A Sonia, Haskell William L, Lv Nan
1 Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, California.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Jan;12(1):1-11. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201406-271OC.
The effect of weight loss on asthma in obese adults warrants rigorous investigation.
To examine an evidence-based, practical, and comprehensive lifestyle intervention targeting modest weight loss and increased physical activity for asthma control.
The trial randomized 330 obese adults with uncontrolled asthma to receive usual care enhanced with a pedometer, a weight scale, information about existing weight management services at the participating clinics, and an asthma education DVD, or with these tools plus the 12-month intervention.
The primary outcome was change in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) scores from baseline to 12 months. Participants (mean [SD] age, 47.6 [12.4] yr) were 70.6% women, 20.0% non-Hispanic black, 20.3% Hispanic/Latino, and 8.2% Asian/Pacific Islander. At baseline, they were obese (mean [SD] body mass index, 37.5 [5.9] kg/m(2)) and had uncontrolled asthma (Asthma Control Test score, 15.1 [3.8]). Compared with control subjects, intervention participants achieved significantly greater mean weight loss (±SE) (intervention, -4.0 ± 0.8 kg vs. control, -2.1 ± 0.8 kg; P = 0.01) and increased leisure-time activity (intervention, 418.2 ± 110.6 metabolic equivalent task-min/wk vs. control, 178.8 ± 109.1 metabolic equivalent task-min/wk; P = 0.05) at 12 months. But between-treatment mean (±SE) differences were not significant for ACQ changes (intervention, -0.3 ± 0.1 vs. control, -0.2 ± 0.1; P = 0.92) from baseline (mean [SD], 1.4 [0.8]), nor for any other clinical asthma outcomes (e.g., spirometric results and asthma exacerbations). Among all participants regardless of treatment assignment, weight loss of 10% or greater was associated with a Cohen d effect of 0.76 and with 3.78 (95% confidence interval, 1.72-8.31) times the odds of achieving clinically significant reductions (i.e., ≥0.5) on ACQ as stable weight (<3% loss or gain from baseline). The effects of other weight change categories were small.
Moderately and severely obese adults with uncontrolled asthma can safely participate in evidence-based lifestyle intervention for weight loss and active living. The modest average weight and activity improvements are comparable to those shown to reduce cardiometabolic risk factors in studies of similar interventions in other populations but are not associated with significant net benefits for asthma control or other clinical asthma outcomes in the current population. Instead, weight loss of 10% or greater may be required to produce clinically meaningful improvement in asthma. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00901095).
体重减轻对肥胖成年人哮喘的影响值得进行严格调查。
研究一种基于证据、实用且全面的生活方式干预措施,旨在适度减轻体重并增加身体活动以控制哮喘。
该试验将330名哮喘控制不佳的肥胖成年人随机分为两组,一组接受常规护理,并配备计步器、体重秤、参与诊所现有体重管理服务的信息以及一张哮喘教育DVD,另一组除了这些工具外,还接受为期12个月的干预。
主要结局指标是从基线到12个月时哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)评分的变化。参与者(平均[标准差]年龄,47.6[±12.4]岁)中女性占70.6%,非西班牙裔黑人占20.0%,西班牙裔/拉丁裔占20.3%,亚太岛民占8.2%。基线时,他们均为肥胖者(平均[标准差]体重指数,37.5[±5.9]kg/m²),且哮喘控制不佳(哮喘控制测试评分, 15.1[±3.8])。与对照组相比,干预组参与者在12个月时体重减轻幅度更大(干预组,-4.0±0.8kg vs.对照组,-2.1±0.8kg;P = 0.01),休闲时间活动量增加(干预组,418.2±110.6代谢当量任务-分钟/周 vs.对照组,178.8±109.1代谢当量任务-分钟/周;P = 0.05)。但从基线(平均[标准差],1.4[±0.8])到12个月时,两组间ACQ变化的平均(±标准差)差异不显著(干预组,-0.3±0.1 vs.对照组,-0.2±0.1;P = 0.92),其他任何临床哮喘结局指标(如肺功能检查结果和哮喘急性发作)也是如此。在所有参与者中,无论治疗分配情况如何将体重减轻10%或更多与Cohen d效应值0.76相关联,与实现ACQ临床显著降低(即≥0.5)的几率是体重稳定(与基线相比体重变化<3%)的3.78(95%置信区间,1.72 - 8.31)倍相关联。其他体重变化类别的影响较小。
哮喘控制不佳的中度和重度肥胖成年人可以安全地参与基于证据的生活方式干预以减轻体重并积极生活。适度的平均体重和活动改善与其他人群类似干预研究中显示的降低心血管代谢危险因素的情况相当,但在当前人群中与哮喘控制或其他临床哮喘结局的显著净益处无关。相反,可能需要减轻10%或更多的体重才能在哮喘方面产生具有临床意义的改善。该临床试验已在www.clinicaltrials.gov注册(NCT00901095)。