Kurl Sudhir, Jae Sae Young, Kauhanen Jussi, Ronkainen Kimmo, Rauramaa Rainer, Laukkanen Jari A
Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio. Finland; Lapland Central Hospital, Rovaniemi, Finland.
Department of Sports Informatics, College of Arts and Physical Education, University of Seoul, South Korea.
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Feb 15;181:155-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.12.023. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
Little is known about exercise cardiac power and the risk of sudden cardiac death. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship of exercise cardiac power (ECP), defined as a ratio of directly measured maximal oxygen uptake with peak systolic blood pressure during exercise, with the risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD).
This prospective study was based on 2358 men who participated in exercise stress test at baseline. During an average follow-up of 20 years 205 SCDs occurred.
Men with ECP (<8.2 mL/mmHg, lowest quartile) had a 4.6-fold (95% CI 2.8-7.5, p<0.001) increased risk of SCD as compared to with ECP in the highest quartile (>12.8mL/mmHg) after adjusting for age and examination years. Men with low ECP (<8.2mL/mmHg) had markedly increased risk of SCD (RR 3.9, 95% CI 2.19-7.14, p<0.001) after adjustment for conventional risk factors and left ventricular hypertrophy, whereas for progressive adjustment for resting systolic blood pressure, the respective risk among men with lowest ECP was 2.5 (95% CI 1.46-4.22, p<0.001). After adding ECP in the multivariate model, the Harrell C-index increased from 0.760 to 0.778 showing the significant incremental value of ECP in predicting SCD. The integrated discrimination improvement was 0.014 (p=0.004).
Low ECP provides a non-invasive and easily available measure for the prediction of SCD and may help in identifying men with high risk for SCD.
关于运动心功率与心源性猝死风险的了解甚少。本研究的目的是探讨运动心功率(ECP,定义为运动期间直接测量的最大摄氧量与收缩压峰值之比)与心源性猝死(SCD)风险之间的关系。
这项前瞻性研究基于2358名在基线时参加运动应激试验的男性。在平均20年的随访期间,发生了205例SCD。
在校正年龄和检查年份后,与ECP处于最高四分位数(>12.8mL/mmHg)的男性相比,ECP(<8.2mL/mmHg,最低四分位数)的男性发生SCD的风险增加了4.6倍(95%CI 2.8-7.5,p<0.001)。在校正传统风险因素和左心室肥厚后,ECP低(<8.2mL/mmHg)的男性发生SCD的风险显著增加(RR 3.9,95%CI 2.19-7.14,p<0.001),而对于静息收缩压进行逐步校正后,ECP最低的男性中的相应风险为2.5(95%CI 1.46-4.22,p<0.001)。在多变量模型中加入ECP后,Harrell C指数从0.760增加到0.778,表明ECP在预测SCD方面具有显著的增量价值。综合鉴别改善为0.014(p=0.004)。
低ECP为预测SCD提供了一种非侵入性且易于获得的指标,可能有助于识别SCD高危男性。