Hayman Kaitlin G, Sharma Davina, Wardlow Robert D, Singh Sonal
1Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,Baltimore,MarylandUSA.
3Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Baltimore,MarylandUSA.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Feb;30(1):80-8. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X14001356. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
The global burden of cardiovascular mortality is increasing, as is the number of large-scale humanitarian emergencies. The interaction between these phenomena is not well understood. This review aims to clarify the relationship between humanitarian emergencies and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
With assistance from a research librarian, electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Global Health) were searched in January 2014. Findings were supplemented by reviewing citations of included trials. Observational studies reporting the effect of natural disasters and conflict events on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in adults since 1997 were included. Studies without a comparison group were not included. Double-data extraction was utilized to abstract information on acute coronary syndrome (ACS), acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Review Manager 5.0 (Version 5.2, The Nordic Cochrane Centre; Copenhagen Denmark,) was used to create figures for qualitative synthesis.
The search retrieved 1,697 unique records; 24 studies were included (17 studies of natural disasters and seven studies of conflict). These studies involved 14,583 cardiac events. All studies utilized retrospective designs: four were population-based, 15 were single-center, and five were multicenter studies. Twenty-three studies utilized historical controls in the primary analysis, and one utilized primarily geographical controls.
Conflicts are associated with an increase in long-term morbidity from ACS; the short-term effects of conflict vary by study. Natural disasters exhibit heterogeneous effects, including increased occurrence of ACS, ADHF, and SCD.
In certain settings, humanitarian emergencies are associated with increased cardiac morbidity and mortality that may persist for years following the event. Humanitarian aid organizations should consider morbidity from noncommunicable disease when planning relief and recuperation projects.
心血管疾病死亡率的全球负担正在增加,大规模人道主义紧急情况的数量也在增加。人们对这些现象之间的相互作用了解甚少。本综述旨在阐明人道主义紧急情况与心血管疾病发病率和死亡率之间的关系。
在一名研究馆员的协助下,于2014年1月检索了电子数据库(PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL和全球健康数据库)。通过查阅纳入试验的参考文献对研究结果进行补充。纳入自1997年以来报告自然灾害和冲突事件对成人心血管疾病发病率和死亡率影响的观察性研究。不包括没有对照组的研究。采用双人数据提取法提取有关急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)、急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)和心源性猝死(SCD)的信息。使用Review Manager 5.0(版本5.2,北欧 Cochrane中心;丹麦哥本哈根)制作定性综合分析图。
检索到1697条独特记录;纳入24项研究(17项关于自然灾害的研究和7项关于冲突的研究)。这些研究涉及1,4583例心脏事件。所有研究均采用回顾性设计:4项基于人群,15项为单中心研究,5项为多中心研究。23项研究在主要分析中采用历史对照,1项主要采用地理对照。
冲突与ACS长期发病率增加有关;冲突的短期影响因研究而异。自然灾害表现出异质性影响,包括ACS、ADHF和SCD发生率增加。
在某些情况下,人道主义紧急情况与心脏发病率和死亡率增加有关,这种情况可能在事件发生后持续数年。人道主义援助组织在规划救援和恢复项目时应考虑非传染性疾病的发病率。