Tyler Denise A, Shield Renée R, Miller Susan C
Center for Gerontology & Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA; Health Services Research Program, Providence Veterans Administration Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Center for Gerontology & Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 May;49(5):846-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
Studies have found that nursing homes (NHs) that rely heavily on Medicaid funding are less likely to implement innovative approaches to care, such as palliative care (PC) or resident-centered approaches commonly referred to as "culture change" (CC). However, a nationally representative survey we previously conducted found that some high Medicaid facilities have implemented these innovative approaches.
The purpose of this study was to identify the factors that enable some high Medicaid NHs to implement innovative approaches to care.
We conducted telephone interviews with 16 NH administrators in four categories of facilities: 1) low PC and low CC, 2) low PC and high CC, 3) high PC and low CC, and 4) high PC and high CC. Interviews explored strategies used to overcome barriers to implementation and the resources needed for implementation.
We had expected to find differences between low and high NHs but instead found differences in NHs' experiences with CC and PC. Since the time of our national survey in 2009-2010, most previously low CC NHs had implemented at least some CC practices; however, we did not find similar changes around PC. Administrators reported numerous ways in which they had received information and assistance from outside entities for implementing CC. This was not the case for PC where administrators reported relying exclusively and heavily on hospices for both their residents' PC needs and information related to PC.
PC advocates could learn much from the CC model in which advocates have used multipronged efforts to institute reform.
研究发现,严重依赖医疗补助资金的养老院(NHs)不太可能采用创新的护理方法,如姑息治疗(PC)或通常被称为“文化变革”(CC)的以居民为中心的方法。然而,我们之前进行的一项全国代表性调查发现,一些高医疗补助设施已经采用了这些创新方法。
本研究的目的是确定使一些高医疗补助养老院能够采用创新护理方法的因素。
我们对四类设施中的16位养老院管理人员进行了电话访谈:1)低PC和低CC,2)低PC和高CC,3)高PC和低CC,4)高PC和高CC。访谈探讨了用于克服实施障碍的策略以及实施所需的资源。
我们原本预期会在低和高医疗补助养老院之间发现差异,但却发现养老院在CC和PC方面的经验存在差异。自2009 - 2010年我们进行全国调查以来,大多数之前低CC的养老院至少实施了一些CC实践;然而,我们在PC方面没有发现类似的变化。管理人员报告了他们从外部实体获得实施CC的信息和援助的多种方式。PC的情况并非如此,管理人员报告在满足居民的PC需求和获取与PC相关的信息方面完全且严重依赖临终关怀机构。
PC倡导者可以从CC模式中学到很多东西,在CC模式中,倡导者采用了多方面的努力来进行改革。