• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

进入时间效应和后续药物竞争。

Entry time effects and follow-on drug competition.

机构信息

GATE-CNRS, University of Lyon 2, Lyon, France.

IRDES-Paris, Paris, France.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jan;17(1):45-60. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0654-9. Epub 2014 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-014-0654-9
PMID:25501258
Abstract

Pharmaceutical firms have been criticized for concentrating efforts of R&D on the so-called me-too or follow-on drugs. There have been many comments for and against the dissemination of these incremental innovations but few papers have broached the subject from an econometric point of view, possibly because identification of me-too or follow-on drugs is not so obvious. This paper focuses on the impact of entry order on follow-on drug competition in the French market between the years 2001 and 2007. More precisely, this study examines the effects on market share of first entrants in the follow-on drug market and how this possible competitive advantage changes over time. First results are coherent with theoretical microeconomic issues concerning the importance of being first. We find evidence that first movers in the follow-on drug market have the ability to capture and maintain greater market share for a long period of time. The hierarchical market position of follow-on drugs does not seem to be affected by generic drug emergence. From a dynamic perspective, our analysis shows that market share is positively correlated with the ability of follow-on drugs to set prices higher than the average follow-on drug prices in a specific therapeutic class, which means that market power remains considerably important for first movers. Moreover, we found that the optimum level of innovation to maximize market share is the highest one.

摘要

制药公司因专注于所谓的“me-too”或跟进药物的研发而受到批评。对于这些增量创新的传播,有很多赞成和反对的意见,但很少有论文从计量经济学的角度探讨这个问题,可能是因为识别“me-too”或跟进药物并不那么明显。本文重点研究了 2001 年至 2007 年法国市场中进入顺序对跟进药物竞争的影响。更确切地说,本研究考察了进入跟进药物市场的先行者对市场份额的影响,以及这种可能的竞争优势随时间的变化。最初的结果与关于先动优势重要性的微观经济学理论问题一致。我们发现,在跟进药物市场中,先行者有能力在很长一段时间内获得并保持更大的市场份额。跟进药物的等级市场地位似乎不受仿制药出现的影响。从动态的角度来看,我们的分析表明,市场份额与跟进药物设定高于特定治疗类别中平均跟进药物价格的能力呈正相关,这意味着市场力量对先行者仍然非常重要。此外,我们发现,实现市场份额最大化的最佳创新水平是最高水平。

相似文献

1
Entry time effects and follow-on drug competition.进入时间效应和后续药物竞争。
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jan;17(1):45-60. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0654-9. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
2
Competitive pricing within pharmaceutical classes: evidence on "follow-on" drugs in Germany 1993-2008.药品类内的竞争定价:德国 1993-2008 年“仿制药”的证据
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Jan;16(1):73-82. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0555-3. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
3
OSTEOPOROSIS DRUGS MARKETED IN THE UNITED STATES: GENERIC COMPETITION, PRICING STRUCTURE, AND DISPERSION AMONG PAYERS.在美国销售的骨质疏松症药物:仿制药竞争、定价结构及支付方之间的差异
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(6):385-392. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000623. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
4
The diffusion of generics after patent expiry in Germany.德国专利到期后仿制药的扩散情况。
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Nov;17(8):1027-1040. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0744-3. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
5
Price regulation and generic competition in the pharmaceutical market.药品市场中的价格管制与仿制药竞争
Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Sep;7(3):208-14. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0357-y.
6
Competition and the Reference Pricing Scheme for pharmaceuticals.药品竞争与参考定价机制。
J Health Econ. 2011 Dec;30(6):1137-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
7
What is the value of 'me-too' drugs?“me-too”药物的价值是什么?
Health Care Manag Sci. 2013 Dec;16(4):300-13. doi: 10.1007/s10729-013-9225-3. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
8
Are drug prices subject to creative destruction? Evidence from the US, 1997-2017.药品价格是否受到创造性破坏的影响?来自 1997-2017 年美国的证据。
Health Econ. 2021 Aug;30(8):1910-1932. doi: 10.1002/hec.4283. Epub 2021 May 13.
9
The importance of being first: evidence from Canadian generic pharmaceuticals.先发优势:来自加拿大非专利药品的证据
Health Econ. 2002 Dec;11(8):723-34. doi: 10.1002/hec.698.
10
Price-cost margin in the pharmaceutical industry. Empirical evidence from Finland.制药行业的价格成本利润率:来自芬兰的实证证据
Eur J Health Econ. 2004 Jun;5(2):122-8. doi: 10.1007/s10198-003-0212-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of proposed price regulations on new patented medicine launches in Canada: a retrospective cohort study.加拿大拟议价格管制对新专利药品上市的影响:回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ. 2024 May 26;196(20):E691-E701. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.231485.
2
Has the development of cancer biomarkers to guide treatment improved health outcomes?癌症生物标志物的发展是否改善了治疗效果,从而提高了健康结局?
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Jul;22(5):789-810. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01290-4. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
3
Anticancer medicines in China: Trends in daily therapy cost and relative procurement volume and spending.

本文引用的文献

1
Competition in the pharmaceutical industry: how do quality differences shape advertising strategies?医药行业的竞争:质量差异如何塑造广告策略?
J Health Econ. 2013 Jan;32(1):268-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
2
How many "me-too" drugs is too many?多少种“me-too”药物才算太多?
JAMA. 2011 Feb 16;305(7):711-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.152.
3
Antiretroviral therapy: new drugs, formulations, ideas, and strategies.抗逆转录病毒疗法:新药、制剂、理念与策略。
中国的抗癌药物:每日治疗费用、相对采购量及支出趋势。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2021 Apr;41(4):345-348. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12144. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
4
Lower Use of Biologics for the Treatment of Asthma in Publicly Insured Individuals.公众保险人群中生物制剂治疗哮喘的使用率较低。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Nov;9(11):3969-3976. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.01.039. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
5
Me-too pharmaceutical products: History, definitions, examples, and relevance to drug shortages and essential medicines lists.Me-too药物:历史、定义、实例及其与药品短缺和基本药物清单的相关性。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;86(11):2114-2122. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14327. Epub 2020 May 13.
6
Determinants of new drugs prescription in the Swiss healthcare market.瑞士医疗保健市场新药处方的决定因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 9;18(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2775-1.
7
Addressing the challenge of high-priced prescription drugs in the era of precision medicine: A systematic review of drug life cycles, therapeutic drug markets and regulatory frameworks.应对精准医学时代高价处方药的挑战:对药物生命周期、治疗药物市场和监管框架的系统评价
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 16;12(8):e0182613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182613. eCollection 2017.
Top HIV Med. 2009 Dec;17(5):146-50.
4
Raltegravir, elvitegravir, and metoogravir: the birth of "me-too" HIV-1 integrase inhibitors.雷特格韦、埃替格韦和替诺福韦酯:“me-too”类HIV-1整合酶抑制剂的诞生。 (注:原文中metoogravir可能有误,推测为tenofovir disoproxil fumarate,即替诺福韦酯,按照正确内容翻译,若原文无误请忽略此注释)
Retrovirology. 2009 Mar 5;6:25. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-6-25.
5
Research & market strategy: how choice of drug discovery approach can affect market position.研究与市场策略:药物研发方法的选择如何影响市场地位。
Drug Discov Today. 2007 Apr;12(7-8):314-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.02.014. Epub 2007 Mar 7.
6
Role of follow-on drugs and indications on the WHO Essential Drug List.仿制药的作用及世界卫生组织基本药物清单中的适应症。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2006 Dec;31(6):585-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2006.00777.x.
7
Therapeutic switching: a new strategic approach to enhance R&D productivity.治疗转换:提高研发效率的新战略方法。
IDrugs. 2005 Nov;8(11):914-8.
8
Appropriateness of use of medicines in elderly inpatients: qualitative study.老年住院患者用药的合理性:定性研究
BMJ. 2005 Oct 22;331(7522):935. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38551.410012.06. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
9
The economics of follow-on drug research and development: trends in entry rates and the timing of development.仿制药研发的经济学:进入率趋势与研发时机
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(2 Suppl 2):1-14. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422002-00002.
10
Differential pricing for pharmaceuticals: reconciling access, R&D and patents.药品差别定价:兼顾可及性、研发与专利
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2003 Sep;3(3):183-205. doi: 10.1023/a:1025384819575.