• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心包穿刺术不良事件风险因素:一项基于全国人口的队列研究。

Pericardiocentesis adverse event risk factors: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

作者信息

Ho Ming-Yun, Wang Jian-Liang, Lin Yu-Sheng, Mao Chun-Tai, Tsai Ming-Lung, Wen Ming-Shien, Wang Chun-Chieh, Hsieh I-Chang, Hung Kuo-Chun, Wang Chao-Yung, Wu Huang-Pin, Chen Tien-Hsing

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.

出版信息

Cardiology. 2015;130(1):37-45. doi: 10.1159/000368796. Epub 2014 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1159/000368796
PMID:25501678
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis has been the leading procedure for diagnosis and therapy of pericardial effusion. We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence, complications, and mortality in pericardial effusion patients treated with pericardiocentesis.

METHODS

We identified and collected data from 8,101 patients receiving pericardiocentesis between 1997 and 2010 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. A multivariate regression model was used to investigate risk factors for recurrence, complications, and death.

RESULTS

There were 8,565 admissions among 8,101 patients. The most common underlying condition was malignancy (41%), especially lung cancer (23%), tuberculosis (9.0%), and acute pericarditis (8.2%). Surgical drainage was required in 12.7% of cases. Recurrence was more likely in patients with malignancy (HR 2.20, p < 0.001), but complications were less likely (OR 0.52, p = 0.003). In-hospital death numbers and complication risks (OR 2.38, p < 0.001; OR 1.27, p = 0.01) were greater in the catheter-related cardiac procedure group than in the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Malignant neoplasms and catheter-based cardiac procedures have become major risk factors for adverse events in patients receiving pericardiocentesis in Taiwan. Malignancy leads to an increase in recurrence and in-hospital mortality but is associated with a lower rate of acute complications. Cardiac catheterization procedures and surgery increase both complications and in-hospital mortality.

摘要

目的

超声心动图引导下的心包穿刺术一直是心包积液诊断和治疗的主要方法。我们旨在确定接受心包穿刺术治疗的心包积液患者复发、并发症和死亡的危险因素。

方法

我们从台湾国民健康保险研究数据库中识别并收集了1997年至2010年间接受心包穿刺术的8101例患者的数据。采用多因素回归模型研究复发、并发症和死亡的危险因素。

结果

8101例患者中有8565次入院。最常见的基础疾病是恶性肿瘤(41%),尤其是肺癌(23%)、结核病(9.0%)和急性心包炎(8.2%)。12.7%的病例需要手术引流。恶性肿瘤患者更容易复发(风险比2.20,p<0.001),但并发症的发生率较低(比值比0.52,p = 0.0)。导管相关心脏手术组的住院死亡人数和并发症风险(比值比2.38,p<0.001;比值比1.27,p = 0.01)高于其他组。

结论

在台湾,恶性肿瘤和基于导管的心脏手术已成为接受心包穿刺术患者发生不良事件的主要危险因素。恶性肿瘤会导致复发率和住院死亡率增加,但急性并发症发生率较低。心脏导管插入术和手术会增加并发症和住院死亡率。

相似文献

1
Pericardiocentesis adverse event risk factors: a nationwide population-based cohort study.心包穿刺术不良事件风险因素:一项基于全国人口的队列研究。
Cardiology. 2015;130(1):37-45. doi: 10.1159/000368796. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
2
Consecutive 1127 therapeutic echocardiographically guided pericardiocenteses: clinical profile, practice patterns, and outcomes spanning 21 years.连续1127例经超声心动图引导的心包穿刺术:21年的临床概况、实践模式及结果
Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 May;77(5):429-36. doi: 10.4065/77.5.429.
3
Pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery: risk factors, patient profiles, and contemporary management.心脏手术后的心包积液:危险因素、患者特征和当代管理。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jan;89(1):112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.09.026.
4
Effectiveness and prognosis of initial pericardiocentesis in the primary management of malignant pericardial effusion.初次心包穿刺术在恶性心包积液初始治疗中的有效性及预后
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Aug;11(2):154-61. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.232546. Epub 2010 May 26.
5
Diagnosis of malignant pericarditis: a single centre experience.恶性心包炎的诊断:单中心经验。
Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(11):1147-53.
6
Comparison of Outcomes of Pericardiocentesis Versus Surgical Pericardial Window in Patients Requiring Drainage of Pericardial Effusions.需要心包积液引流的患者中心包穿刺术与外科心包开窗术的结局比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Sep 1;120(5):883-890. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
7
Pericardiocentesis in contemporary practice.当代实践中的心包穿刺术。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2011 Jun;23(6):234-9.
8
Outcomes of primary and secondary treatment of pericardial effusion in patients with malignancy.恶性肿瘤患者心包积液的初次及二次治疗结果
Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Mar;75(3):248-53. doi: 10.4065/75.3.248.
9
[Pericardiocentesis afrer heart surgery--our experience].[心脏手术后的心包穿刺术——我们的经验]
Vnitr Lek. 2008 Apr;54(4):334-40.
10
Outcomes of clinically significant idiopathic pericardial effusion requiring intervention.需要干预的具有临床意义的特发性心包积液的治疗结果。
Am J Cardiol. 2003 Mar 15;91(6):704-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)03408-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Complication rates in real-time ultrasound-guided vs static echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis: a cohort study.实时超声引导与静态超声心动图引导心包穿刺术的并发症发生率:一项队列研究。
Echo Res Pract. 2025 Apr 1;12(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s44156-025-00071-6.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Echo- vs. Fluoroscopy-Guided Pericardiocentesis in Cardiac Tamponade.超声心动图引导与荧光透视引导下心包穿刺术治疗心脏压塞的安全性和有效性
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 4;61(2):265. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020265.
3
The safety of pericardiocentesis in patients under antithrombotic therapy: A single-center experience.
抗血栓治疗患者心包穿刺术的安全性:单中心经验
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 21;9:1013979. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1013979. eCollection 2022.
4
Unveiling the causes of pericardial effusion in a contemporary case series of pericardiocentesis in Latin America.揭示拉美经皮心包穿刺术当代病例系列中心包积液病因。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 26;12(1):16010. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19339-6.
5
Feasibility and safety of CT-aided pericardiocentesis from a subxiphoid anterior approach by using fluoroscopy in patients with chronic pericardial effusions.经剑突下前入路 CT 辅助下心包穿刺术治疗慢性心包积液的可行性和安全性。
Clin Cardiol. 2022 May;45(5):519-526. doi: 10.1002/clc.23810. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
6
A case of liver injury and pneumo-haemoperitoneum during pericardiocentesis.心包穿刺术期间发生肝损伤和气腹血腹1例。
J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Feb 6;2022(2):rjac009. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjac009. eCollection 2022 Feb.
7
Transthoracic M-mode Echocardiography Demonstrating Cardiac Tamponade.经胸M型超声心动图显示心包填塞。
Cureus. 2021 Dec 2;13(12):e20106. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20106. eCollection 2021 Dec.
8
What is the ideal approach for emergent pericardiocentesis using point-of-care ultrasound guidance?使用床旁超声引导进行急诊心包穿刺术的理想方法是什么?
World J Emerg Med. 2021;12(3):169-173. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2021.03.001.
9
Coronary artery perforation secondary to lifesaving pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade: a case report.冠状动脉穿孔继发于抢救性心包穿刺术治疗心脏压塞:病例报告。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Jan 28;21(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-01875-0.
10
Central venous catheter placement leading to an emergent paramedian sternotomy: a case report.中心静脉导管置入导致急诊胸骨旁正中切开术:一例病例报告。
J Surg Case Rep. 2020 Sep 24;2020(9):rjaa368. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaa368. eCollection 2020 Sep.