Williams H N
Curr Med Res Opin. 1989;11(7):417-26. doi: 10.1185/03007998909115928.
The efficacy of nedocromil sodium (2 x 2 mg puffs twice a day) was assessed in a multi-centre, double-blind parallel group placebo-controlled study of 159 adult patients with chronic reversible obstructive airways disease. Over two-thirds of the patients had been maintained on or used an inhaled bronchodilator prior to the study. During a 4-week baseline period, patients stopped using their current respiratory therapy, with the exception of oral bronchodilators, and were established on a maintenance regimen of inhaled salbutamol (2 puffs 4-times daily with additional doses as needed). Patients then received either nedocromil sodium or placebo in place of the maintenance salbutamol regimen and inhaled salbutamol was allowed only on an as needed basis during a 12-week double-blind period. Daily diary records were made by patients of symptom severity, morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate, and salbutamol usage. The doctor assessed overall severity of the patient's condition at 4-weekly intervals, and both patients and doctor assessed treatment effectiveness at the end of the trial. Total symptom severity (night-time symptoms, morning tightness and daytime symptoms) was reduced and morning and evening PEFR improved throughout in the nedocromil sodium-treated patients, although evening PEFR returned nearly to the baseline in the final 4 weeks of the study. The reduction in combined day and night-time inhaled bronchodilator use from the baseline was significantly greater in the nedocromil sodium-treated patients and these patients were significantly (p less than 0.05) improved compared to the placebo-treated patients on each of the three occasions that the physicians assessed disease severity. Of the 40 patients withdrawn during the double-blind period of the study (26 on nedocromil sodium, 14 on placebo), 9 and 7 patients, respectively, were withdrawn because of the onset of uncontrolled asthma, and 4 and 2 patients, respectively, because of suspected adverse reactions to treatment. A total of 21 patients treated with nedocromil sodium recorded unusual symptoms (9 commented on taste, 5 had nausea and vomiting) compared with 16 patients on placebo. Overall, nedocromil sodium was considered to be moderately or very effective in at least 50% of the patients, although no significant differences were seen between treatments in either the patients' or physicians' assessment.
在一项针对159例慢性可逆性阻塞性气道疾病成年患者的多中心、双盲平行组安慰剂对照研究中,评估了奈多罗米钠(每日2次,每次2吸,每吸2mg)的疗效。超过三分之二的患者在研究前一直在使用或曾使用吸入性支气管扩张剂。在为期4周的基线期内,患者停止使用当前的呼吸治疗药物,但口服支气管扩张剂除外,并开始使用吸入沙丁胺醇维持治疗方案(每日4次,每次2吸,必要时额外增加剂量)。然后,患者在12周的双盲期内接受奈多罗米钠或安慰剂治疗,以替代维持治疗的沙丁胺醇方案,仅在必要时允许使用吸入沙丁胺醇。患者每天记录症状严重程度、早晚呼气峰值流速以及沙丁胺醇使用情况。医生每隔4周评估患者病情的总体严重程度,患者和医生在试验结束时评估治疗效果。在接受奈多罗米钠治疗的患者中,总体症状严重程度(夜间症状、晨起气促和日间症状)有所减轻,早晚呼气峰值流速均有所改善,不过在研究的最后4周,夜间呼气峰值流速几乎恢复到基线水平。与基线相比,接受奈多罗米钠治疗的患者白天和夜间吸入性支气管扩张剂联合使用量的减少幅度显著更大,并且在医生评估疾病严重程度的三次过程中,这些患者与接受安慰剂治疗的患者相比均有显著改善(p<0.05)。在研究的双盲期内撤出的40例患者中(26例使用奈多罗米钠,14例使用安慰剂),分别有9例和7例因哮喘失控发作而撤出,分别有4例和2例因怀疑对治疗有不良反应而撤出。共有21例接受奈多罗米钠治疗的患者记录了异常症状(9例提及味觉,5例出现恶心和呕吐),而接受安慰剂治疗的患者有16例。总体而言,至少50%的患者认为奈多罗米钠有中度或非常显著的疗效,不过在患者或医生的评估中,各治疗组之间均未观察到显著差异。