Fyans P G, Chatterjee P C, Chatterjee S S
Department of Respiratory Physiology, Wythenshaw Hospital, Manchester, U.K.
Clin Exp Allergy. 1989 Sep;19(5):521-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1989.tb02427.x.
In a 12-week double-blind, group comparative trial, preceded by a 2-week baseline period, 38 asthmatic subjects of mixed aetiology and varying severity received either 4 mg nedocromil sodium by metered dose inhaler twice a day or a matching placebo preparation, in addition to their existing maintenance therapy of inhaled corticosteroids plus inhaled bronchodilators. Asthma severity and lung function were assessed at 4-weekly clinic visits, and symptomatology (morning tightness, daytime asthma, cough, night-time asthma), morning, afternoon and evening PEFR, and the use of inhaled bronchodilators were recorded on daily diary cards. Treatment with nedocromil sodium led to significant (P less than 0.05) improvements in clinic assessment of FEV1 and PEFR both before and after an inhaled bronchodilator from at least the eighth week onwards. Mid-study FVC was also significantly (P less than 0.05) improved. Daily PEFR increased throughout the study in the nedocromil sodium-treated subjects and the diurnal variation was reduced. Daily symptom severity was also reduced and these improvements occurred despite the similar or slightly reduced use of inhaled bronchodilators. However, none of these improvements in diary card parameters reached statistical significance. By the final week of the study subjects treated with nedocromil sodium predominantly had a mild form of asthma or no symptoms at all, and both patients and clinicians reported the effectiveness of nedocromil sodium; the subjects but not the clinicians finding it significantly more effective (P less than 0.05) than placebo. Nedocromil sodium was well tolerated although one patient was withdrawn owing to a persistent sore throat after 7 weeks of treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在一项为期12周的双盲分组对照试验中,在为期2周的基线期之后,38名病因混合且病情严重程度各异的哮喘患者,除了接受现有的吸入性皮质类固醇加吸入性支气管扩张剂维持治疗外,每天两次通过定量吸入器接受4毫克奈多罗米钠治疗或匹配的安慰剂制剂。在每4周的门诊就诊时评估哮喘严重程度和肺功能,并在每日日记卡上记录症状(晨起胸闷、日间哮喘、咳嗽、夜间哮喘)、晨起、下午和傍晚的呼气峰流速(PEFR)以及吸入性支气管扩张剂的使用情况。从至少第8周起,奈多罗米钠治疗使吸入支气管扩张剂前后的FEV1和PEFR的临床评估有显著(P<0.05)改善。研究中期的用力肺活量(FVC)也有显著(P<0.05)改善。在接受奈多罗米钠治疗的受试者中,整个研究期间每日PEFR增加,且昼夜变化减小。每日症状严重程度也降低,尽管吸入性支气管扩张剂的使用相似或略有减少,但仍出现了这些改善。然而,日记卡参数的这些改善均未达到统计学意义。到研究最后一周,接受奈多罗米钠治疗的受试者主要患有轻度哮喘或根本没有症状,患者和临床医生均报告了奈多罗米钠的有效性;受试者发现其比安慰剂显著更有效(P<0.05),但临床医生未发现。奈多罗米钠耐受性良好,尽管有一名患者在治疗7周后因持续咽痛而退出研究。(摘要截取自250字)