Roessner A, Vollmer E, Zwadlo G, Sorg C, Kolve M, von Bassewitz D B, Wuisman P, Härle A, Grundmann E
Curr Top Pathol. 1989;80:205-27. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-74462-4_9.
Recent investigations have suggested that osteoclasts and osteoblasts belong to different cell systems: osteoclasts originate from hemopoietic stem cells, most probably via precursors of the mononuclear phagocyte system. Osteoblasts, however, arise from local mesenchyme. The present classification of bone tumors issued by the WHO, however, is still based on the assumption of osteoclasts and osteoblasts being merely different manifestations or differentiations of the same basic cell type. Consequently, histiocytes or macrophages as well as osteoclast-like giant cells are interpreted in most bone tumors as an autochthonous component of the tumor. In the present study, this theory is contradicted by histological immunohistological, electron microscopic, and autoradiographic-electron microscopic results on a larger number of osteosarcomas, chondromas, chondrosarcomas, chondroblastomas, aneurysmal bone cysts, giant cell tumors of bone, malignant fibrous histiocytomas, fibrosarcomas, desmoplastic fibromas, Ewing's sarcomas, fibrous dysplasias, nonossifying fibromas, and malignant hemangioenkdotheliomas of bone. In order to elucidate the role of macrophages and osteoclast-like giant cells, different monoclonal antibodies were applied to bone tumor specimens as markers of mononuclear macrophages and giant cells. The concept of what is called fibrohistiocytic tumors should be reconsidered. Immunohistological studies have shown that in malignant fibrous histiocytoma as well as in giant cell tumors of bone only a certain portion of macrophages will react with the highly specific antibodies, whereas the majority of tumor cells are negative. This finding alone suggests that the infiltration of macrophages is a reactive phenomenon. It is in agreement with earlier autoradiographic and electron microscopic investigations on giant cell tumors of bone, confirming that only the fibroblast-like tumors are actually proliferating. These data were verified in the present study with the aid of double labeling immunohistological techniques, using antibodies against mature tissue macrophages and others against a proliferation-associated nuclear antigen. Only the fibroblast-like cells, which do not react with the macrophage-specific antibody, will express the proliferation-associated nuclear antigen. Analogous results were obtained in malignant fibrous histiocytoma. We may infer from these results that the majority of these tumors must be neoplasms of local mesenchyme, mostly in fibroblastic differentiation, while the considerable number of macrophages is seen as a reactive phenomenon.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
最近的研究表明,破骨细胞和成骨细胞属于不同的细胞系统:破骨细胞起源于造血干细胞,很可能是通过单核吞噬细胞系统的前体细胞而来。而成骨细胞则起源于局部间充质。然而,世界卫生组织发布的目前骨肿瘤分类仍然基于破骨细胞和成骨细胞仅仅是同一基本细胞类型的不同表现或分化这一假设。因此,在大多数骨肿瘤中,组织细胞或巨噬细胞以及破骨细胞样巨细胞被解释为肿瘤的固有成分。在本研究中,对大量骨肉瘤、软骨瘤、软骨肉瘤、成软骨细胞瘤、动脉瘤样骨囊肿、骨巨细胞瘤、恶性纤维组织细胞瘤、纤维肉瘤、促纤维增生性纤维瘤、尤因肉瘤、骨纤维异常增殖症、非骨化性纤维瘤以及骨恶性血管内皮瘤进行的组织学、免疫组织学、电子显微镜和放射自显影 - 电子显微镜检查结果与这一理论相矛盾。为了阐明巨噬细胞和破骨细胞样巨细胞的作用,将不同的单克隆抗体应用于骨肿瘤标本,作为单核巨噬细胞和巨细胞的标志物。所谓纤维组织细胞肿瘤的概念应该重新考虑。免疫组织学研究表明,在恶性纤维组织细胞瘤以及骨巨细胞瘤中,只有一部分巨噬细胞会与高度特异性抗体发生反应,而大多数肿瘤细胞呈阴性。仅这一发现就表明巨噬细胞的浸润是一种反应性现象。这与早期对骨巨细胞瘤的放射自显影和电子显微镜研究结果一致,证实只有成纤维细胞样肿瘤细胞实际在增殖。在本研究中,借助双重标记免疫组织学技术,使用针对成熟组织巨噬细胞的抗体和针对增殖相关核抗原的其他抗体,验证了这些数据。只有不与巨噬细胞特异性抗体发生反应的成纤维细胞样细胞会表达增殖相关核抗原。在恶性纤维组织细胞瘤中也获得了类似结果。我们可以从这些结果推断,这些肿瘤中的大多数必定是局部间充质的肿瘤,大多呈成纤维细胞分化,而大量巨噬细胞则被视为一种反应性现象。(摘要截取自400字)