Suppr超能文献

“契约性”与“合作性”公民参与:英格兰和威尔士“防洪行动小组”的兴起与作用

'Contractual' and 'cooperative' civic engagement: The emergence and roles of 'flood action groups' in England and Wales.

作者信息

Geaves Linda H, Penning-Rowsell Edmund C

机构信息

Oxford University Centre for the Environment, South Parks Road, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Ambio. 2015 Sep;44(5):440-51. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0576-x. Epub 2014 Dec 12.

Abstract

Devolution of responsibilities is transforming how flood risk is managed in many countries. Research assessing the emergence and role of a new element in the governance of flood risk management in England explored the numerous 'flood action groups' that have developed over the last decade. We identified two broad categories of relationship between the public and authorities. The first displays 'contractual' characteristics: a level of protection provided by the authority in exchange for taxes or similar support. The second embodies a 'collaborative' relationship: public knowledge, social and financial resources are equal and complementary to those of authority, and seeking 'collective security'. In general, the former were more successful than the latter, but common lessons were that success in FRM should not be defined purely as the ability to prevent flooding, but as the ability to access a variety of resources across different levels of society at different stages of flood risk management.

摘要

责任下放正在改变许多国家管理洪水风险的方式。一项研究评估了英国洪水风险管理治理中一个新元素的出现及其作用,该研究探讨了过去十年中发展起来的众多“防洪行动小组”。我们确定了公众与当局之间的两大类关系。第一种表现出“契约性”特征:当局提供一定程度的保护,以换取税收或类似支持。第二种体现了“合作性”关系:公众的知识、社会和财政资源与当局的资源平等且互补,并寻求“集体安全”。总体而言,前者比后者更成功,但共同的经验教训是,洪水风险管理的成功不应仅仅定义为预防洪水的能力,而应定义为在洪水风险管理的不同阶段获取社会不同层面各种资源的能力。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验