Allardet-Servent A, Bouziges N, Carles-Nurit M J, Bourg G, Gouby A, Ramuz M
Faculté de Médecine, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Montpellier-Nîmes, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Sep;27(9):2057-61. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.9.2057-2061.1989.
Epidemiological investigations of bacterial infections are generally based on multiple phenotypic markers that are often difficult to verify. A more general and reliable method is genomic DNA analysis by restriction endonucleases. However, the commonly used endonucleases produce too many fragments for correct separation by agarose electrophoresis. In contrast, simple electrophoretic patterns are obtained after genomic DNA digestion by low-frequency-cleavage restriction endonucleases and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, making it easier to compare numerous strains from the same species. This technique was used to investigate an Acinetobacter calcoaceticus outbreak in a urologic department and bronchial colonization of artificially ventilated patients by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an intensive care unit. The method allowed a clear distinction between epidemic and self-contaminating strains in these different epidemiological situations.
细菌感染的流行病学调查通常基于多个表型标记,而这些标记往往难以验证。一种更通用且可靠的方法是通过限制性内切酶进行基因组DNA分析。然而,常用的内切酶产生的片段过多,无法通过琼脂糖电泳进行正确分离。相比之下,用低频切割限制性内切酶消化基因组DNA并进行脉冲场凝胶电泳后,可获得简单的电泳图谱,从而更易于比较同一物种的众多菌株。该技术被用于调查泌尿外科的醋酸钙不动杆菌暴发以及重症监护病房中人工通气患者的铜绿假单胞菌支气管定植情况。在这些不同的流行病学情况下,该方法能够清晰地区分流行菌株和自我污染菌株。