Suppr超能文献

急性呼吸道或耳部感染儿童的抗生素使用:常规初级保健条件下顺势疗法与传统疗法的前瞻性观察比较

Antibiotic Use in Children with Acute Respiratory or Ear Infections: Prospective Observational Comparison of Anthroposophic and Conventional Treatment under Routine Primary Care Conditions.

作者信息

Hamre Harald J, Glockmann Anja, Schwarz Reinhard, Riley David S, Baars Erik W, Kiene Helmut, Kienle Gunver S

机构信息

Institute for Applied Epistemology and Medical Methodology, University of Witten-Herdecke, Zechenweg 6, 79111 Freiburg, Germany.

Paediatric Practice, Quellengasse 42, 8010 Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:243801. doi: 10.1155/2014/243801. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

Abstract

Children with acute respiratory or ear infections (RTI/OM) are often unnecessarily prescribed antibiotics. Antibiotic resistance is a major public health problem and antibiotic prescription for RTI/OM should be reduced. Anthroposophic treatment of RTI/OM includes anthroposophic medications, nonmedication therapy and if necessary also antibiotics. This secondary analysis from an observational study comprised 529 children <18 years from Europe (AT, DE, NL, and UK) or USA, whose caregivers had chosen to consult physicians offering anthroposophic (A-) or conventional (C-) treatment for RTI/OM. During the 28-day follow-up antibiotics were prescribed to 5.5% of A-patients and 25.6% of C-patients (P < 0.001); unadjusted odds ratio for nonprescription in A- versus C-patients 6.58 (95%-CI 3.45-12.56); after adjustment for demographics and morbidity 6.33 (3.17-12.64). Antibiotic prescription rates in recent observational studies with similar patients in similar settings, ranged from 31.0% to 84.1%. Compared to C-patients, A-patients also had much lower use of analgesics, somewhat quicker symptom resolution, and higher caregiver satisfaction. Adverse drug reactions were infrequent (2.3% in both groups) and not serious. Limitation was that results apply to children of caregivers who consult A-physicians. One cannot infer to what extent antibiotics might be avoided in children who usually receive C-treatment, if they were offered A-treatment.

摘要

患有急性呼吸道或耳部感染(RTI/OM)的儿童常常被不必要地开具抗生素处方。抗生素耐药性是一个重大的公共卫生问题,应减少针对RTI/OM的抗生素处方。对RTI/OM的人智学治疗包括人智学药物、非药物疗法,必要时也包括抗生素。这项来自一项观察性研究的二次分析纳入了529名来自欧洲(奥地利、德国、荷兰和英国)或美国的18岁以下儿童,其照料者选择咨询提供人智学(A-)或传统(C-)治疗RTI/OM的医生。在28天的随访期间,5.5%的A组患者和25.6%的C组患者被开具了抗生素(P<0.001);A组与C组患者未开具抗生素的未调整比值比为6.58(95%置信区间3.45 - 12.56);在对人口统计学和发病率进行调整后为6.33(3.17 - 12.64)。近期在类似环境中对类似患者进行的观察性研究中,抗生素处方率在31.0%至84.1%之间。与C组患者相比,A组患者的镇痛药使用量也低得多,症状缓解稍快,照料者满意度更高。药物不良反应很少见(两组均为2.3%)且不严重。局限性在于结果适用于咨询A类医生的照料者的儿童。无法推断如果通常接受C类治疗的儿童接受A类治疗,抗生素可在多大程度上被避免使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23af/4251819/aa04f2fbdf17/ECAM2014-243801.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验