Murray Desiree W, Molina Brooke S G, Glew Kelly, Houck Patricia, Greiner Andrew, Fong Dalea, Swanson James, Arnold L Eugene, Lerner Marc, Hechtman Lily, Abikoff Howard B, Jensen Peter S
Duke University Medical Center and Social Science Research Institute, Duke University.
Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Pittsburgh.
School Ment Health. 2014 Dec 1;6(4):264-278. doi: 10.1007/s12310-014-9128-6.
This study examines the prevalence and characteristics of services reported by school staff for 543 high school students participating in the 8 year follow-up of the multi-site Multimodal Treatment study of ADHD (MTA). Overall, 51.6% of students with a history of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were receiving services through an Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) or a 504 plan, a rate higher than expected for this age group. Less than 5% of these had 504 plans; 35.5% attended special education classes. Very few services (except tutoring) were provided outside of an IEP or 504 plan. Almost all students with services received some type of academic intervention, whereas only half received any behavioral support or learning strategy. Less than one-fourth of interventions appear to be evidence-based. Students receiving services showed greater academic and behavioral needs than those not receiving services. Services varied based upon type of school, with the greatest number of interventions provided to students attending schools that only serve those with disabilities. Original MTA treatment randomization was unrelated to services, but cumulative stimulant medication and greater severity predicted more service receipt. Results highlight a need for accommodations with greater evidence of efficacy and for increased services for students who develop academic difficulties in high school.
本研究调查了参与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)多地点多模式治疗研究(MTA)8年随访的543名高中生的学校工作人员报告的服务的患病率和特征。总体而言,有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)病史的学生中,51.6%通过个性化教育计划(IEP)或504计划接受服务,这一比例高于该年龄组的预期。其中不到5%的学生有504计划;35.5%的学生参加特殊教育课程。除辅导外,在IEP或504计划之外提供的服务很少。几乎所有接受服务的学生都接受了某种类型的学业干预,而只有一半的学生接受了任何行为支持或学习策略。不到四分之一的干预措施似乎基于证据。接受服务的学生比未接受服务的学生表现出更大的学业和行为需求。服务因学校类型而异,为只招收残疾学生的学校的学生提供的干预措施最多。最初的MTA治疗随机分组与服务无关,但累积使用兴奋剂药物和病情更严重预示着会接受更多服务。研究结果凸显了对具有更强疗效证据的便利措施的需求,以及为在高中出现学业困难的学生增加服务的必要性。