Osgood Eric, Trudeau Jeremiah J, Eaton Thomas A, Jensen Mark P, Gammaitoni Arnold, Simon Lee S, Katz Nathaniel
Analgesic Solutions, 232 Pond Street, Natick, MA, 01760, USA.
Rheumatol Int. 2015 Jun;35(6):1005-13. doi: 10.1007/s00296-014-3191-z. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
There are no standardized bedside assessments for subtyping patients with osteoarthritis (OA) based on pain mechanisms. Thus, we developed a bedside sensory testing kit (BSTK) to classify OA patients based on sensory profiles potentially indicative of pain mechanism. After usability and informal reliability testing (n = 22), the kit was tested in a formal reliability study (n = 20). Patients completed questionnaires and sensory testing: pressure algometry to detect hyperalgesia; repeat algometry after heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation to measure diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC); light touch using Von Frey filaments; and cold allodynia using a brass rod. The procedure was brief and well tolerated. Algometry and filament testing were highly reliable [intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) 0.71-0.91]; DNIC was acceptably reliable (ICCs 0.53-0.91); brass rod reliability was inconclusive. Patients were classified empirically into four groups: "All abnormal findings" (primary and secondary hyperalgesia and dysfunctional DNIC); "all normal findings"; and two intermediate groups. The "all abnormal findings" group had more neuropathic pain symptoms, and lower WOMAC total, stiffness, and activity scores than the "all normal findings" group. Simple BSTK procedures, consolidated in a kit, reliably classified OA patients into subgroups based on sensory profile, suggesting that OA patients differ in underlying pain mechanisms. Further research is needed to confirm these subgroups and determine their validity in predicting response to treatment.
目前尚无基于疼痛机制对骨关节炎(OA)患者进行亚型分类的标准化床旁评估方法。因此,我们开发了一种床旁感觉测试套件(BSTK),用于根据可能指示疼痛机制的感觉特征对OA患者进行分类。在进行可用性和非正式可靠性测试(n = 22)后,该套件在一项正式可靠性研究(n = 20)中进行了测试。患者完成了问卷调查和感觉测试:使用压力测痛法检测痛觉过敏;在异位有害条件刺激后重复测痛法以测量弥漫性有害抑制控制(DNIC);使用von Frey细丝进行轻触测试;以及使用黄铜棒进行冷觉异常测试。该程序简短且耐受性良好。压力测痛法和细丝测试具有高度可靠性[组内相关系数(ICC)为0.71 - 0.91];DNIC的可靠性尚可接受(ICC为0.53 - 0.91);黄铜棒测试的可靠性尚无定论。根据经验将患者分为四组:“所有异常发现”组(原发性和继发性痛觉过敏以及功能失调的DNIC);“所有正常发现”组;以及两个中间组。“所有异常发现”组比“所有正常发现”组有更多的神经性疼痛症状,且WOMAC总分、僵硬和活动评分更低。简单的BSTK程序整合在一个套件中,可根据感觉特征将OA患者可靠地分为亚组,这表明OA患者在潜在疼痛机制方面存在差异。需要进一步研究来确认这些亚组,并确定它们在预测治疗反应方面的有效性。