Shaffer B
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic Institute, New York, NY 10003.
Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst. 1989 Spring;49(1):55-74.
Heterotopic ossification (HO) status post total hip arthroplasty is a relatively common phenomenon with clinical significance in approximately 5% of all cases. Risk factors appear to include males with osteoarthritis, particularly with marked osteophyte formation, and those with ankylosing spondylitis or diffuse idiopathic spinal hyperostosis. Previous hip surgery, or previous ectopic bone in the same or contralateral hip are definite predisposing factors. Although meticulous surgical technique is critical in any operation, the suggestions that carelessness in dissection or tissue handling, or inadequate hemostasis or debridement of devitalized tissues or of bony debris can cause HO are unproved. Similarly, there is no solid evidence that the surgical approach, prosthesis type, use of trochanteric osteotomy, or the presence of cement influence the incidence of HO. Whether postoperative complications such as infection, dislocation, or hematoma are causally related is speculative; and the role of alkaline phosphatase in predicting those at risk remains controversial. Despite the number of studies designed to elucidate risk factors, critical analysis suggests that this question remains largely unanswered and that there is a need for well-designed, prospective, controlled studies to determine which hip arthroplasty patients are at risk. Treatment of established HO depends upon recognizing the "maturity" of the ectopic bone, which can best be determined by serial scans but is approximately one year postop. Excision followed by prompt initiation of radiotherapy or of one of several reported nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug protocols will produce successful results in a majority of cases. Prophylaxis depends upon recognizing those at significant risk and initiating the appropriate protocol within the first few postoperative days.
全髋关节置换术后异位骨化(HO)是一种相对常见的现象,在所有病例中约5%具有临床意义。危险因素似乎包括患骨关节炎的男性,尤其是有明显骨赘形成的患者,以及患强直性脊柱炎或弥漫性特发性骨肥厚的患者。既往髋关节手术,或同侧或对侧髋关节既往有异位骨形成,均为明确的易感因素。虽然在任何手术中精细的手术技术都至关重要,但关于解剖或组织处理粗心、止血不充分或对失活组织或骨碎片清创不充分会导致HO的说法尚未得到证实。同样,没有确凿证据表明手术入路、假体类型、转子截骨术的使用或骨水泥的存在会影响HO的发生率。术后并发症如感染、脱位或血肿是否存在因果关系尚属推测;碱性磷酸酶在预测高危患者中的作用仍存在争议。尽管有许多研究旨在阐明危险因素,但批判性分析表明,这个问题在很大程度上仍未得到解答,需要设计良好的前瞻性对照研究来确定哪些髋关节置换患者有风险。已形成的HO的治疗取决于识别异位骨的“成熟度”,这最好通过系列扫描确定,但大约在术后一年。切除后立即开始放疗或采用几种已报道的非甾体抗炎药方案之一,在大多数情况下会取得成功。预防取决于识别那些有显著风险的患者,并在术后头几天内启动适当的方案。