Suppr超能文献

风险伦理中的盲点:管理自然灾害。

The blind spot in risk ethics: managing natural hazards.

作者信息

Doorn Neelke

机构信息

Department of Technology, Policy and Management, Technical University Delft, PO Box 5015, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands;.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2015 Mar;35(3):354-60. doi: 10.1111/risa.12293. Epub 2014 Dec 16.

Abstract

Many risk scholars recognize the importance of including ethical considerations in risk management. Risk ethics can provide in-depth ethical analysis so that ethical considerations can be part of risk-related decisions, rather than an afterthought to those decisions. In this article, I present a brief sketch of the field of risk ethics. I argue that risk ethics has a bias toward technological hazards, thereby overlooking the risks that stem from natural and semi-natural hazards. In order to make a contribution to the field of risk research, risks ethics should broaden its scope to include natural and semi-natural hazards and develop normative distribution criteria that can support decision making on such hazards.

摘要

许多风险学者认识到在风险管理中纳入伦理考量的重要性。风险伦理学能够提供深入的伦理分析,以便伦理考量能够成为与风险相关决策的一部分,而不是这些决策事后才想到的事情。在本文中,我简要概述了风险伦理学领域。我认为风险伦理学对技术危害存在偏向,从而忽视了源于自然和半自然危害的风险。为了对风险研究领域做出贡献,风险伦理学应扩大其范围,将自然和半自然危害纳入其中,并制定能够支持针对此类危害进行决策的规范性分配标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验