• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偏向右侧:利用眼动追踪技术研究注意力在导航不对称中的作用。

Deviating to the right: using eyetracking to study the role of attention in navigation asymmetries.

作者信息

Robertson Joanne S, Forte Jason D, Nicholls Michael E R

机构信息

University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia,

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Apr;77(3):830-43. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0813-1.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-014-0813-1
PMID:25515431
Abstract

The ability to navigate accurately through the environment and avoid obstacles is essential for effective interactions with the environment. It is therefore surprising that systematic rightward errors are observed when neurologically intact participants navigate through doorways-most likely due to the operation of biases in spatial attention. These rightward errors may arise due to the operation of an extinction-like process, whereby participants overattend to the left doorpost and collide with the right one. Alternatively, rightward biases might reflect a bisection bias, such that the extrapersonal nature of the aperture causes participants to misbisect the aperture slightly to the right of true center. Because eye movements and spatial attention are closely related, in this study we used eyetracking to test the extinction and bisection models in a remote wheelchair navigation task. University students (n = 16) made rightward errors when navigating the wheelchair through a doorway, and fixated more frequently toward the right side of the aperture throughout the trial. These results are inconsistent with an extinction-based theory of navigation asymmetry, which predicts a leftward bias in eye position due to participants overattending to the left side of the doorway. Instead, the observed rightward bias in eye movements strongly supports a bisection-based theory of navigation asymmetry, whereby participants mentally "mark" the midpoint of a doorway toward the right and then head toward that point, resulting in rightward deviations. The rightward nature of participants' navigation errors and eye positions is consistent with the existence of a rightward attentional bias for extrapersonal stimuli.

摘要

在环境中准确导航并避开障碍物的能力对于与环境进行有效互动至关重要。因此,令人惊讶的是,当神经功能正常的参与者穿过门口时会出现系统性的向右偏差——这很可能是由于空间注意力偏差的作用。这些向右偏差可能是由于类似消退过程的运作而产生的,即参与者过度关注左门柱并与右门柱碰撞。或者,向右偏差可能反映了一种二等分偏差,即孔径的身外性质导致参与者将孔径的中点误判在真实中心右侧。由于眼动和空间注意力密切相关,在本研究中,我们使用眼动追踪技术在远程轮椅导航任务中测试消退模型和二等分模型。大学生(n = 16)在驾驶轮椅穿过门口时出现了向右偏差,并且在整个试验过程中更频繁地注视孔径的右侧。这些结果与基于消退的导航不对称理论不一致,该理论预测由于参与者过度关注门口左侧,眼位会出现向左偏差。相反,观察到的眼动向右偏差有力地支持了基于二等分的导航不对称理论,即参与者在心理上把门口的中点“标记”在右侧,然后朝着那个点前进,从而导致向右偏差。参与者导航错误和眼位的向右性质与身外刺激存在向右注意力偏差相一致。

相似文献

1
Deviating to the right: using eyetracking to study the role of attention in navigation asymmetries.偏向右侧:利用眼动追踪技术研究注意力在导航不对称中的作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Apr;77(3):830-43. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0813-1.
2
A hit-and-miss investigation of asymmetries in wheelchair navigation.一项关于轮椅导航不对称性的随意性调查。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Aug;72(6):1576-90. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.6.1576.
3
Cognitive load exacerbates rightward biases during computer maze navigation.认知负荷会加剧在电脑迷宫导航过程中的向右偏差。
Brain Cogn. 2020 Apr;140:105547. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105547. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
4
The relationship between spatial cognition and walking trajectory for passing through a doorway: evident in individuals with dominant right eye?穿过门口时空间认知与行走轨迹之间的关系:在右眼占主导的个体中是否明显?
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Mar;233(3):797-807. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4155-y. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
5
Directional bias in the body while walking through a doorway: its association with attentional and motor factors.在穿过门口时身体的方向性偏差:其与注意力和运动因素的关联。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Apr;210(2):195-206. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2621-3. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
6
Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.视觉和听觉的空间注意偏差。
Brain Cogn. 2010 Aug;73(3):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.05.007. Epub 2010 Jun 20.
7
Rightward biases in free-viewing visual bisection tasks: implications for leftward responses biases on similar tasks.自由观看视觉平分任务中的右向偏差:对类似任务中左向反应偏差的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2005 Dec;59(3):296-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.021. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
8
Through Doorways and Down Corridors: Investigating Asymmetries During Computer Maze Navigation.穿越门道与沿着走廊:探究计算机迷宫导航中的不对称性
J Cogn. 2020 Feb 3;3(1):4. doi: 10.5334/joc.92.
9
Rightward bisection errors for letter lines: the role of semantic information.字母行的向右平分误差:语义信息的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jan 28;45(2):295-304. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.07.003. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
10
Heading to the right: The effect of aperture width on navigation asymmetries for miniature remote-controlled vehicles.向右行驶:孔径宽度对微型遥控车辆导航不对称性的影响
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2016 Jun;22(2):225-37. doi: 10.1037/xap0000078. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Through Doorways and Down Corridors: Investigating Asymmetries During Computer Maze Navigation.穿越门道与沿着走廊:探究计算机迷宫导航中的不对称性
J Cogn. 2020 Feb 3;3(1):4. doi: 10.5334/joc.92.
2
Right-lateralised lane keeping in young and older British drivers.右偏置车道保持在年轻和年长的英国司机中。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 6;13(9):e0203549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203549. eCollection 2018.
3
Crashing Left vs. Right: Examining Navigation Asymmetries Using the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study Data.向左碰撞与向右碰撞:利用SHRP2自然驾驶研究数据检验导航不对称性
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 12;8:2153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02153. eCollection 2017.
4
An investigation of left/right driving rules on deviations while walking.关于行走时左右偏离的驾驶规则调查。 (此译文感觉原始文本表述不太准确,正常逻辑应该是关于行走时左右偏离与左右驾驶规则的调查,但按要求逐字翻译如此。)
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 11;12(10):e0186171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186171. eCollection 2017.