Angelon-Gaetz K A, Richardson D B, Lipton D M, Marshall S W, Lamb B, LoFrese T
Epidemiology Department, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
North Carolina Division of Public Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Indoor Air. 2015 Dec;25(6):620-30. doi: 10.1111/ina.12176. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
Both high and low indoor relative humidity (RH) directly impact Indoor Air Quality (IAQ), an important school health concern. Prior school studies reported a high prevalence of mold, roaches, and water damage; however, few examined associations between modifiable classroom factors and RH, a quantitative indicator of dampness. We recorded RH longitudinally in 134 North Carolina classrooms (n = 9066 classroom-days) to quantify the relationships between modifiable classroom factors and average daily RH below, within, or above levels recommended to improve school IAQ (30-50% or 30-60% RH). The odds of having high RH (>60%) were 5.8 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.9, 11.3] times higher in classrooms with annual compared to quarterly heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) system maintenance and 2.5 (95% CI: 1.5, 4.2) times higher in classrooms with HVAC economizers compared to those without economizers. Classrooms with direct-expansion split systems compared to chilled water systems had 2.7 (95% CI: 1.7, 4.4) times higher odds of low RH (<30%). When unoccupied, classrooms with thermostat setbacks had 3.7 (95% CI: 1.7, 8.3) times the odds of high RH (>60%) of those without setbacks. This research suggests actionable decision points for school design and maintenance to prevent high or low classroom RH.
This study combines longitudinal measurements of classroom relative humidity with school inspection data from several schools to describe the problem of relative humidity control in schools. Our findings on how maintenance and mechanical factors affect classroom humidity provide suggestions on building operations policies and heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) design considerations that may improve classroom relative humidity control.
室内相对湿度(RH)过高或过低都会直接影响室内空气质量(IAQ),这是学校健康方面的一个重要问题。先前的学校研究报告了霉菌、蟑螂和水损的高发生率;然而,很少有研究探讨可改变的教室因素与RH(潮湿程度的定量指标)之间的关联。我们对北卡罗来纳州134间教室的RH进行了纵向记录(共9066个教室日),以量化可改变的教室因素与低于、处于或高于改善学校IAQ建议水平(30 - 50%或30 - 60% RH)的平均每日RH之间的关系。与每季度进行一次供暖、通风和空调(HVAC)系统维护的教室相比,每年进行维护的教室出现高RH(>60%)的几率高5.8倍[95%置信区间(CI):2.9,11.3];与没有节能器的教室相比,装有HVAC节能器的教室出现高RH的几率高2.5倍(95% CI:1.5,4.2)。与冷冻水系统相比,采用直接膨胀式分体系统的教室出现低RH(<30%)的几率高2.7倍(95% CI:1.7,4.4)。无人占用时,设置了温度补偿的教室出现高RH(>60%)的几率是未设置温度补偿教室的3.7倍(95% CI:1.7,8.3)。这项研究为学校设计和维护提供了可采取行动的决策要点,以防止教室RH过高或过低。
本研究将教室相对湿度的纵向测量与来自多所学校的检查数据相结合,以描述学校相对湿度控制问题。我们关于维护和机械因素如何影响教室湿度的研究结果,为建筑运营政策以及可能改善教室相对湿度控制的供暖、通风和空调(HVAC)设计考虑提供了建议。