• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于注意力缺陷多动障碍的问题提示清单的设计和用户测试。

The design and user-testing of a question prompt list for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 16;4(12):e006585. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006585.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006585
PMID:25515843
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4275667/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study involved the development of a question prompt list (QPL) booklet designed to facilitate communication and shared decision-making between parents/carers of children diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and their clinicians; and user-testing of the QPL to assess its usability.

DESIGN

Best practice in information writing and design was used to format the QPL content into a 16-page booklet. We then applied user-testing, which uses mixed methods to assess document performance with small cohorts of participants and then improves it in an iterative process. Individual interviews assessed the ability of QPL users to locate and understand key points of information, followed by a semistructured questionnaire, to ascertain their general views about the booklet.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Testing was undertaken with two cohorts of 10 parents/carers of children with ADHD (n=20); matched on age, gender and educational attainment.

TESTED DOCUMENTS

In round 1, we tested 15 key points of information related to the QPL. Participant responses and feedback from round 1 informed a revised version of the booklet, tested in a subsequent round.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

The target was for 8/10 of the participants to be able to find and demonstrate an understanding of all key information points, in accordance with European guidelines for medicine leaflet testing.

RESULTS

After round 1, problems related to 4/15 information points were identified (booklet purpose; preparing for appointments; asking about a second medical opinion; selecting which questions to ask). Participants also made suggestions regarding the booklet's layout and design. After round 2, all information points were located and understood by at least 8/10 participants.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to have developed a usable ADHD-specific QPL for use by parents/carers of children with ADHD during clinical consultations, and the first demonstration of the utility of user-testing methods in ensuring QPL usability.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发一种问题提示清单(QPL)手册,以促进被诊断为注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童的父母/照顾者与其临床医生之间的沟通和共同决策;并对 QPL 进行用户测试,以评估其可用性。

设计

最佳信息编写和设计实践用于将 QPL 内容格式化为 16 页的手册。然后,我们应用用户测试,该测试使用混合方法来评估小样本参与者的文档性能,然后在迭代过程中进行改进。个别访谈评估了 QPL 用户定位和理解关键信息点的能力,然后进行半结构化问卷调查,以确定他们对该手册的总体看法。

设置和参与者

测试是在两个 ADHD 儿童的父母/照顾者(n=20)队列中进行的;年龄、性别和教育程度相匹配。

测试文件

在第一轮中,我们测试了与 QPL 相关的 15 个关键信息点。参与者的反应和第一轮的反馈为小册子的修订版提供了信息,随后在第二轮中进行了测试。

主要结果测量

目标是 8/10 的参与者能够找到并理解所有关键信息点,符合欧洲药物说明书测试指南。

结果

第一轮后,确定了与 4/15 个信息点相关的问题(手册目的;为预约做准备;询问第二医疗意见;选择要询问的问题)。参与者还就小册子的布局和设计提出了建议。第二轮后,至少有 8/10 的参与者找到了并理解了所有信息点。

结论

这是第一项为 ADHD 儿童的父母/照顾者在临床咨询期间使用而开发的可用 ADHD 特定 QPL 的研究,也是第一项展示用户测试方法在确保 QPL 可用性方面的实用性的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/161c/4275667/3ac27aff6053/bmjopen2014006585f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/161c/4275667/d40ba1d405e9/bmjopen2014006585f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/161c/4275667/3ac27aff6053/bmjopen2014006585f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/161c/4275667/d40ba1d405e9/bmjopen2014006585f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/161c/4275667/3ac27aff6053/bmjopen2014006585f02.jpg

相似文献

1
The design and user-testing of a question prompt list for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.用于注意力缺陷多动障碍的问题提示清单的设计和用户测试。
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 16;4(12):e006585. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006585.
2
The evaluation of a question prompt list for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in pediatric care: A pilot study.儿科护理中注意力缺陷/多动障碍问题提示清单的评估:一项试点研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Jan-Feb;13(1):172-186. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
3
Development and validation of a question prompt list for parents of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a Delphi study.注意缺陷多动障碍患儿家长问题提示清单的开发与验证:一项德尔菲研究
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):234-52. doi: 10.1111/hex.12341. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
4
Asking questions can help: development and preliminary evaluation of a question prompt list for palliative care patients.提问可能会有所帮助:针对姑息治疗患者的问题提示清单的开发与初步评估
Br J Cancer. 2003 Dec 1;89(11):2069-77. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601380.
5
"User-testing" as a method for testing the fitness-for-purpose of written medicine information.“用户测试”作为一种测试书面医学信息是否适用的方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jun;83(3):404-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.03.016. Epub 2011 May 6.
6
Development and Testing of a Question Prompt List for Common Hand Conditions: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.常见手部疾病问题提示清单的制定与测试:一项探索性序贯混合方法研究。
J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Nov;45(11):1087.e1-1087.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
7
Development and modification of a dysphagia question prompt list to improve patient-physician communication: Incorporating both esophageal expert and patient perspectives.开发和修改吞咽困难问题提示清单以改善医患沟通:纳入食管专家和患者的观点。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Aug;35(8):e14600. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14600. Epub 2023 Apr 30.
8
Encouraging Patients to Ask Questions: Development and Pilot Testing of a Question Prompt List for Patients Undergoing a Biopsy for Suspected Prostate Cancer.鼓励患者提问:为疑似前列腺癌接受活检的患者制定问题提示清单的开发和初步测试。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Feb 8;30(2):2088-2104. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30020162.
9
Randomized trial of a question prompt list to increase patient active participation during interactions with black patients and their oncologists.一项关于问题提示列表的随机试验,旨在提高黑人患者与其肿瘤学家互动期间患者的积极参与度。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 May;100(5):818-826. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.026. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
10
Testing the utility of a cancer clinical trial specific Question Prompt List (QPL-CT) during oncology consultations.在肿瘤学咨询中测试癌症临床试验专用问题提示清单 (QPL-CT) 的效用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Aug;88(2):311-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Life on the Frontlines: Caregiver Experience of Pediatric Cerebrospinal Shunt Malfunction.前线生活:小儿脑积水分流故障的护理人员体验。
Pediatr Neurol. 2023 Oct;147:124-129. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.07.021. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
2
A Caregiver Digital Intervention to Support Shared Decision Making in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: Development Process and Stakeholder Involvement Analysis.一项支持儿童和青少年心理健康服务中共同决策的照护者数字干预措施:开发过程及利益相关者参与分析
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jun 15;5(6):e24896. doi: 10.2196/24896.
3
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Digital Intervention to Support Shared Decision-making in Children's and Young People's Mental Health: Mixed Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Do parents of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) receive adequate information about the disorder and its treatments? A qualitative investigation.患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童的家长是否获得了有关该疾病及其治疗方法的充分信息?一项定性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 May 8;8:661-70. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S60164. eCollection 2014.
2
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: an update on medication adherence and persistence in children, adolescents and adults.注意力缺陷/多动障碍:儿童、青少年及成人药物依从性和持续性的最新进展
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Dec;13(6):791-815. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2013.841544.
3
一项支持儿童和青少年心理健康共同决策的数字干预措施的可行性和可接受性:混合方法试点随机对照试验
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Mar 2;5(3):e25235. doi: 10.2196/25235.
4
Improving Communication in Outpatient Consultations in People With Cirrhosis: The Development of a Question Prompt List (QPL).改善肝硬化患者门诊就诊中的沟通:问题提示清单(QPL)的制定。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov/Dec;54(10):898-904. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001347.
5
A scoping review and assessment of essential elements of shared decision-making of parent-involved interventions in child and adolescent mental health.一项关于儿童和青少年心理健康中家长参与干预的共同决策基本要素的范围审查和评估。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;30(9):1319-1338. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01530-7. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
6
Neurodevelopmental Risk: A Tool to Enhance Conversations With Families of Infants.神经发育风险:增进与婴儿家庭沟通的工具
J Child Neurol. 2019 Oct;34(11):653-659. doi: 10.1177/0883073819844927. Epub 2019 May 29.
7
Adaptation of the European Commission-recommended user testing method to patient medication information leaflets in Japan.将欧盟推荐的用户测试方法应用于日本的患者用药信息说明书。
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2017 Jun 14;9:39-63. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S114985. eCollection 2017.
8
Development and validation of a question prompt list for parents of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a Delphi study.注意缺陷多动障碍患儿家长问题提示清单的开发与验证:一项德尔菲研究
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):234-52. doi: 10.1111/hex.12341. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
Background, clinical features and treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children.
儿童注意缺陷多动障碍的背景、临床特征和治疗。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013 Oct;14(14):1885-906. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2013.818977. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
4
User testing in developing patient medication information in Europe.在欧洲开发患者用药信息中的用户测试。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):640-5. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.02.007. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
5
Factors influencing parental decision making about stimulant treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.影响父母对注意力缺陷/多动障碍使用兴奋剂治疗决策的因素。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2013 Apr;23(3):163-78. doi: 10.1089/cap.2012.0087. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
6
Agreement between Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, and the proposed DSM-V attention deficit hyperactivity disorder diagnostic criteria: an exploratory study.《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版与 DSM-V 注意缺陷多动障碍诊断标准的一致性:一项探索性研究。
Compr Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;54(1):7-10. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
7
DSM-5 further inflates attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版进一步夸大了注意力缺陷多动障碍。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012 Jun;200(6):486-8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318257c4b6.
8
Preventing overdiagnosis: how to stop harming the healthy.预防过度诊断:如何避免伤害健康者。
BMJ. 2012 May 28;344:e3502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3502.
9
Development and piloting of a brain tumour-specific question prompt list.脑肿瘤特异性问题提示清单的制定和试点。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012 Jul;21(4):517-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2012.01328.x. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
10
ADHD: clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents.ADHD:儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的诊断、评估和治疗的临床实践指南。
Pediatrics. 2011 Nov;128(5):1007-22. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2654. Epub 2011 Oct 16.