Suppr超能文献

通过体验式信息处理增强叙事信息的效果:一项实验研究。

Enhancing the effects of a narrative message through experiential information processing: An experimental study.

作者信息

Dillard Amanda J, Hisler Garrett

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , Grand Valley State University , Allendale , MI , USA.

出版信息

Psychol Health. 2015;30(7):803-20. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.996565. Epub 2015 Jan 27.

Abstract

First-person narratives are becoming a popular means to communicate health risk information. Although studies show they can increase risk perception and motivate health behaviours compared to statistical messages, more research on the conditions in which they are particularly likely to have effects is needed. In this study, we tested a moderator related to how information is processed. Specifically, we hypothesised that thinking in terms of emotions and personal experiences - known as experiential information processing - would increase people's responsiveness to a narrative. Female college students (N = 138) who reported indoor tanning were randomly assigned to read a first-person narrative message or a statistical message about the risks of skin cancer. Prior to reading the message, the women received instructions that would activate either experiential or rational information processing. Participants then reported their risk perceptions of skin cancer, worry about skin cancer and behaviour intentions related to skin cancer. Analyses showed that message type and information processing interacted to influence risk perceptions and worry. Consistent with hypotheses, participants reported the highest risk perception and worry when they used an experiential information system prior to reading the narrative message. There were no effects on behaviour intentions. Implications of these findings are discussed.

摘要

第一人称叙述正成为传达健康风险信息的一种流行方式。尽管研究表明,与统计信息相比,它们可以提高风险认知并激发健康行为,但仍需要对它们特别可能产生效果的条件进行更多研究。在本研究中,我们测试了一个与信息处理方式相关的调节变量。具体而言,我们假设从情感和个人经历的角度进行思考——即所谓的体验式信息处理——会增强人们对叙述的反应。报告有室内晒黑行为的女大学生(N = 138)被随机分配阅读一篇关于皮肤癌风险的第一人称叙述信息或统计信息。在阅读信息之前,这些女性会收到激活体验式或理性信息处理的指导语。参与者随后报告了她们对皮肤癌的风险认知、对皮肤癌的担忧以及与皮肤癌相关的行为意图。分析表明,信息类型和信息处理方式相互作用,影响风险认知和担忧。与假设一致,参与者在阅读叙述信息之前使用体验式信息系统时,报告的风险认知和担忧程度最高。对行为意图没有影响。本文讨论了这些发现的意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验