Stoekenbroek R M, Ubbink D T, Reekers J A, Koelemay M J W
Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;49(2):192-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Arterial calcification may render the ankle-brachial index (ABI) unreliable in diabetic patients. Although guidelines recommend the toe-brachial index (TBI) for patients with falsely elevated ABI arbitrarily defined as an ABI > 1.4, arterial calcification is also common among diabetic patients with an ABI ≤ 1.4. This could result in a "falsely normalized" ABI and under-diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). We investigated whether diabetes invalidates the ABI as opposed to the TBI, and if the TBI may therefore be more suitable for detecting PAD in diabetic patients.
The difference between ABI and TBI was compared between diabetic and non-diabetic patients with an ABI ≤ 1.4 referred to the vascular laboratory. A Bland-Altman plot was constructed to assess whether ABI-TBI differences were dependent on the magnitude of the measurements. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with a normal ABI, and for patients with critical ischemia.
The population comprised 161 diabetic (252 limbs) and 160 non-diabetic (253 limbs) patients (mean age 67). Median ABIs (0.79 vs. 0.80) were similar, while median TBI was 0.07 higher in diabetics (p = 0.024). The ABI-TBI difference in diabetics and non-diabetics was similar (0.32 vs. 0.35; p = .084), and was also similar for patients with a normal ABI. Moreover, ABI-TBI differences in diabetic- and non-diabetic patients overlapped, irrespective of the magnitude of the measurements. Diabetes was not associated with larger differences between ankle and toe pressures (mean difference -0.9 mmHg, 95% confidence interval -15 to 13 mmHg) among patients with critical ischemia.
No evidence was found that the TBI may overcome the potentially invalidated ABI in diabetic patients with an ABI ≤ 1.4. ABI and TBI are strongly associated, and this relationship is not influenced by diabetes. Therefore, the TBI does not allow for earlier detection of ischemia in diabetes.
目的/背景:动脉钙化可能会使糖尿病患者的踝臂指数(ABI)不可靠。尽管指南推荐将趾臂指数(TBI)用于ABI被任意定义为>1.4的假性升高患者,但动脉钙化在ABI≤1.4的糖尿病患者中也很常见。这可能导致ABI“假性正常化”以及外周动脉疾病(PAD)的漏诊。我们研究了与TBI相比,糖尿病是否会使ABI无效,以及TBI是否因此更适合于检测糖尿病患者的PAD。
比较血管实验室中ABI≤1.4的糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的ABI与TBI之间的差异。构建Bland-Altman图以评估ABI-TBI差异是否取决于测量值的大小。对ABI正常的患者和严重缺血的患者进行亚组分析。
研究人群包括161例糖尿病患者(252条肢体)和160例非糖尿病患者(253条肢体)(平均年龄67岁)。中位数ABI(0.79对0.80)相似,而糖尿病患者的中位数TBI高0.07(p = 0.024)。糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的ABI-TBI差异相似(0.32对0.35;p = 0.084),ABI正常的患者也是如此。此外,糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的ABI-TBI差异重叠,与测量值大小无关。在严重缺血的患者中,糖尿病与踝压和趾压之间的较大差异无关(平均差异-0.9 mmHg,95%置信区间-15至13 mmHg)。
未发现有证据表明TBI可以克服ABI≤1.4的糖尿病患者中可能无效的ABI。ABI和TBI密切相关,且这种关系不受糖尿病影响。因此,TBI不能更早检测出糖尿病患者的缺血情况。