• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寻找重要临床试验中幽默且夸张的首字母缩略词以及极不合适的名称(科学性研究):定性和定量系统研究。

SearCh for humourIstic and Extravagant acroNyms and Thoroughly Inappropriate names For Important Clinical trials (SCIENTIFIC): qualitative and quantitative systematic study.

作者信息

Pottegård Anton, Haastrup Maija Bruun, Stage Tore Bjerregaard, Hansen Morten Rix, Larsen Kasper Søltoft, Meegaard Peter Martin, Meegaard Line Haugaard Vrdlovec, Horneberg Henrik, Gils Charlotte, Dideriksen Dorthe, Aagaard Lise, Almarsdottir Anna Birna, Hallas Jesper, Damkier Per

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark

Department of Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ. 2014 Dec 16;349:g7092. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7092.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.g7092
PMID:25516539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4267482/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the development of acronym use across five major medical specialties and to evaluate the technical and aesthetic quality of the acronyms.

DESIGN

Acronyms obtained through a literature search of Pubmed.gov followed by a standardised assessment of acronym quality (BEAUTY and CHEATING criteria).

PARTICIPANTS

Randomised controlled trials within psychiatry, rheumatology, pulmonary medicine, endocrinology, and cardiology published between 2000 and 2012.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence proportion of acronyms and composite quality score for acronyms over time.

RESULTS

14,965 publications were identified, of which 18.3% (n=2737) contained an acronym in the title. Acronym use was more common among cardiological studies than among the other four medical specialties (40% v 8-15% in 2012, P<0.001). Except for within cardiology, the prevalence of acronyms increased over time, with the average prevalence proportion among the remaining four specialties increasing from 4.0% to 12.4% from 2000 to 2012 (P<0.001). The median combined acronym quality score decreased significantly over the study period (P<0.001), from a median 9.25 in 2000 to 5.50 in 2012.

CONCLUSION

From 2000 to 2012 the prevalence of acronyms in trial reports increased, coinciding with a substantial decrease in the technical and aesthetic quality of the acronyms. Strict enforcement of current guidelines on acronym construction by journal editors is necessary to ensure the proper use of acronyms in the future.

摘要

目的

描述五个主要医学专科领域中首字母缩略词的使用发展情况,并评估这些首字母缩略词的技术和美学质量。

设计

通过对Pubmed.gov进行文献检索获取首字母缩略词,随后对首字母缩略词质量进行标准化评估(采用BEAUTY和CHEATING标准)。

参与者

2000年至2012年间发表的精神病学、风湿病学、肺病学、内分泌学和心脏病学领域的随机对照试验。

主要观察指标

首字母缩略词的流行比例以及首字母缩略词随时间变化的综合质量得分。

结果

共识别出14965篇出版物,其中18.3%(n = 2737)的标题中包含首字母缩略词。首字母缩略词在心脏病学研究中的使用比其他四个医学专科更为常见(2012年为40%对8 - 15%,P < 0.001)。除心脏病学领域外,首字母缩略词的流行率随时间增加,其余四个专科的平均流行比例从2000年的4.0%增至2012年的12.4%(P < 0.001)。在研究期间,首字母缩略词综合质量得分的中位数显著下降(P < 0.001),从2000年的中位数9.25降至2012年的5.50。

结论

从2000年到2012年,试验报告中首字母缩略词的流行率增加,与此同时首字母缩略词的技术和美学质量大幅下降。期刊编辑严格执行当前关于首字母缩略词构建的指南对于确保未来首字母缩略词的正确使用是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c4/4793834/2d7b660355f9/pota022787.f2_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c4/4793834/fbb754ac25d6/pota022787.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c4/4793834/2d7b660355f9/pota022787.f2_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c4/4793834/fbb754ac25d6/pota022787.f1_default.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2c4/4793834/2d7b660355f9/pota022787.f2_default.jpg

相似文献

1
SearCh for humourIstic and Extravagant acroNyms and Thoroughly Inappropriate names For Important Clinical trials (SCIENTIFIC): qualitative and quantitative systematic study.寻找重要临床试验中幽默且夸张的首字母缩略词以及极不合适的名称(科学性研究):定性和定量系统研究。
BMJ. 2014 Dec 16;349:g7092. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7092.
2
Use of acronyms in anaesthetic and associated investigations: appropriate or unnecessary? - the UOAIAAAIAOU Study.在麻醉和相关检查中使用缩写词:合适还是不必要?- UOAIAAAIAOU 研究。
Anaesthesia. 2018 Dec;73(12):1531-1534. doi: 10.1111/anae.14450.
3
Some trial acronyms using famous artists' names such as MICHELANGELO, MATISSE, PICASSO, and REMBRANDT are not true acronyms at all.
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jul 15;98(2):276-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.016. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
4
Leveraging PubMed to Create a Specialty-Based Sense Inventory for Spanish Acronym Resolution.利用PubMed创建用于西班牙语首字母缩略词解析的基于专业的语义库。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 16;270:292-296. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200169.
5
Mapping of medical acronyms and initialisms to Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) across selected systems.跨选定系统将医学首字母缩略词和首字母缩写词映射到医学主题词表(MeSH)。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Oct;94(4):410-4.
6
The growth of acronyms in the scientific literature.科技文献中缩略语的增长。
Elife. 2020 Jul 23;9:e60080. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60080.
7
A sense inventory for clinical abbreviations and acronyms created using clinical notes and medical dictionary resources.使用临床笔记和医学词典资源创建的临床缩写和首字母缩略词感知清单。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):299-307. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001506. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
8
A deep database of medical abbreviations and acronyms for natural language processing.用于自然语言处理的医学缩写和首字母缩略词的深度数据库。
Sci Data. 2021 Jun 2;8(1):149. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00929-4.
9
Are acronyms really irregular? Preserved acronym reading in a case of semantic dementia.首字母缩写词真的不规则吗?语义性痴呆病例中保留的首字母缩写词阅读。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Aug;51(9):1673-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 May 29.
10
The potentially coercive nature of some clinical research trial acronyms.一些临床研究试验首字母缩略词潜在的强制性本质。
Chest. 2002 Jun;121(6):2023-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.6.2023.

引用本文的文献

1
reatively rguing for impler ponyms.
CASE (Phila). 2025 Jun 16;9(6):173-174. doi: 10.1016/j.case.2025.05.001. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Analyzing the Creation and Use of Abbreviations in Cardiology and Cardiac Imaging Society Guidelines.分析心脏病学和心脏影像学会指南中缩写词的创建与使用情况。
JACC Adv. 2025 Jan 13;4(2):101561. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101561. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
The term CAKUT has outlived its usefulness: the case for the prosecution.CAKUT 一词已经过时:支持起诉。

本文引用的文献

1
Acronyms Confuse Everyone: combating the use of acronyms to describe paediatric research studies.首字母缩略词让人人都困惑:抵制使用首字母缩略词来描述儿科研究。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2014 Oct;50(10):756-8. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12603. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
2
Quantifying federal funding and scholarly output related to the academic emergency medicine consensus conferences.量化与学术急诊医学共识会议相关的联邦资金和学术成果。
Acad Med. 2014 Jan;89(1):176-81. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000073.
3
The impact of article length on the number of future citations: a bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals.
Pediatr Nephrol. 2022 Nov;37(11):2785-2791. doi: 10.1007/s00467-022-05576-4. Epub 2022 May 16.
4
Team approach to polypharmacy evaluation and reduction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.多药治疗评估与减少的团队方法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Oct 26;22(1):746. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05685-9.
5
The growth of acronyms in the scientific literature.科技文献中缩略语的增长。
Elife. 2020 Jul 23;9:e60080. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60080.
6
Syndemics: A theory in search of data or data in search of a theory?综合征:理论在寻找数据,还是数据在寻找理论?
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jun;206:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.040. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
7
Comment on: Teaching metacognition in clinical decision-making using a novel mnemonic checklist: an exploratory study.评论:使用新型记忆检查表在临床决策中教授元认知:一项探索性研究。
Singapore Med J. 2017 Jun;58(6):343. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2017050.
文章长度对未来被引次数的影响:普通医学期刊的文献计量学分析。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e49476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049476. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
4
TAC: AOITROMJA? (the acronym conundrum: advancing or impeding the readability of medical journal articles?).
Radiology. 2013 Feb;266(2):383-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12121776.
5
Imageability, age of acquisition, and frequency factors in acronym comprehension.首字母缩略词理解中的形象性、习得年龄和频率因素。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013 Jun;66(6):1131-45. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.731073. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
6
Is NIH funding predictive of greater research productivity and impact among academic otolaryngologists?美国国立卫生研究院的资助是否能预测学术耳鼻喉科医生具有更高的研究生产力和影响力?
Laryngoscope. 2013 Jan;123(1):118-22. doi: 10.1002/lary.23659. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
7
Statins but not aspirin reduce thrombotic risk assessed by thrombin generation in diabetic patients without cardiovascular events: the RATIONAL trial.他汀类药物而非阿司匹林可降低无心血管事件的糖尿病患者血栓生成评估的血栓风险:RATIONAL 试验。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032894. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
8
Citation impact. Saudi universities offer cash in exchange for academic prestige.引用影响力。沙特的大学用现金换取学术声誉。
Science. 2011 Dec 9;334(6061):1344-5. doi: 10.1126/science.334.6061.1344.
9
Citations: the rules they didn't teach you.
Lipids. 2011 Apr;46(4):307-9. doi: 10.1007/s11745-011-3543-3.
10
What's in a name? Another unexplained acronym!
Int J Cardiol. 2010 Oct 8;144(2):291-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.02.014. Epub 2009 Mar 14.