• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后引流与不引流的荟萃分析。

Meta-analysis of drainage versus no drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Picchio Marcello, Lucarelli Pierino, Di Filippo Annalisa, De Angelis Francesco, Stipa Francesco, Spaziani Erasmo

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hospital "P. Colombo," Velletri, Italy.

Basildon Hospital, Basildon, England.

出版信息

JSLS. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00242.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2014.00242
PMID:25516708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4266231/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Routine drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the role of drains in reducing complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

An electronic search of Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library database from January 1990 to June 2013 was performed to identify randomized clinical trials that compare prophylactic drainage with no drainage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The odds ratio for qualitative variables and standardized mean difference for continuous variables were calculated.

RESULTS

Twelve randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis, involving 1939 patients randomized to a drain (960) versus no drain (979). The morbidity rate was lower in the no drain group (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.26 to 3.10; P = .003). The wound infection rate was lower in the no drain group (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.22 to 4.51; P = .01). Abdominal pain 24 hours after surgery was less severe in the no drain group (standardized mean difference, 2.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 3.34; P < .0001). No significant difference was present with respect to the presence and quantity of subhepatic fluid collection, shoulder tip pain, parenteral ketorolac consumption, nausea, vomiting, and hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

This study was unable to prove that drains were useful in reducing complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

摘要

背景与目的

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的常规引流仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在评估引流在降低腹腔镜胆囊切除术后并发症方面的作用。

方法

对1990年1月至2013年6月的医学文献数据库、科学引文索引扩展版、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行电子检索,以确定比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术中预防性引流与不引流的随机临床试验。计算定性变量的比值比和连续变量的标准化均数差。

结果

荟萃分析纳入了12项随机对照试验,涉及1939例患者,随机分为引流组(960例)和不引流组(979例)。不引流组的发病率较低(比值比,1.97;95%置信区间,1.26至3.10;P = .003)。不引流组的伤口感染率较低(比值比,2.35;95%置信区间,1.22至4.51;P = .01)。术后24小时不引流组的腹痛较轻(标准化均数差,2.30;95%置信区间,1.27至3.34;P < .0001)。在肝下积液的存在和量、肩部尖端疼痛、静脉注射酮咯酸的用量、恶心、呕吐和住院时间方面无显著差异。

结论

本研究未能证明引流对降低腹腔镜胆囊切除术后并发症有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/7e6df1a7dcda/jls0041332410008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/76ac30d972cf/jls0041332410001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/5e472150183a/jls0041332410002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/c084b7ef11c8/jls0041332410003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/6d808003d328/jls0041332410004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/cfcaa4fd3992/jls0041332410005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/4718abf963fc/jls0041332410006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/84bccb240af3/jls0041332410007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/7e6df1a7dcda/jls0041332410008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/76ac30d972cf/jls0041332410001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/5e472150183a/jls0041332410002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/c084b7ef11c8/jls0041332410003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/6d808003d328/jls0041332410004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/cfcaa4fd3992/jls0041332410005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/4718abf963fc/jls0041332410006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/84bccb240af3/jls0041332410007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79a3/4266231/7e6df1a7dcda/jls0041332410008.jpg

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of drainage versus no drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后引流与不引流的荟萃分析。
JSLS. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00242.
2
Prophylactic drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎后预防性引流:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2019 Jun;71(2):247-254. doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00648-x. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
3
Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单纯性腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的常规腹腔引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD006004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006004.pub3.
4
Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy.非复杂性腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的常规腹腔引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD006004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006004.pub2.
5
Routine abdominal drainage versus no abdominal drainage for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单纯性腹腔镜胆囊切除术中常规腹腔引流与不进行腹腔引流的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 3(9):CD006004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006004.pub4.
6
Drain after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized multicentre controlled trial.择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术后引流。一项随机多中心对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2817-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2252-1. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
7
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术的预防性腹腔引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 21;10(10):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub3.
8
Drainage No Drainage after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎后不置引流管:一项荟萃分析
Am Surg. 2019 Jan 1;85(1):86-91.
9
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术的预防性腹腔引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 21(8):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub2.
10
Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated open cholecystectomy.单纯性开腹胆囊切除术的常规腹腔引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;2007(2):CD006003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006003.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Residual intraperitoneal carbon dioxide gas following laparoscopy for adnexal masses: Residual gas volume assessment and postoperative outcome analysis.腹腔镜附件包块切除术后腹腔内残余二氧化碳气体:残余气量评估与术后转归分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 2;101(35):e30142. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030142.
2
Treatment strategies of drain after complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎复杂腹腔镜胆囊切除术后引流的治疗策略
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Jun 15;25(2):51-52. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.2.51.
3
Optimal drain management following complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a propensity-matched comparative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Drain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis. A Pilot Randomized Study.急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术后引流。一项初步随机研究。
Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 2):288-92. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0797-9. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
2
Routine Sub-hepatic Drainage versus No Drainage after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Open, Randomized, Clinical Trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后常规肝下引流与不引流的比较:开放性随机临床试验
Indian J Surg. 2013 Feb;75(1):22-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0452-5. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
3
Laparoscopic elective cholecystectomy with and without drain: A controlled randomised trial.
急性胆囊炎复杂腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的最佳引流管理:一项倾向匹配的比较研究。
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Jun 15;25(2):63-72. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.2.63.
4
To drain or not to drain: the association between residual intraperitoneal gas and post-laparoscopic shoulder pain for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.是否引流:腹腔镜胆囊切除术后残余腹腔内气体与腹腔镜术后肩痛的关系。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 1;11(1):7447. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85714-4.
5
The effect on morbidity of the use of prophylactic abdominal drain following elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术后使用预防性腹腔引流对发病率的影响。
Pak J Med Sci. 2019 Sep-Oct;35(5):1306-1311. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.5.291.
6
Prophylactic drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎后预防性引流:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2019 Jun;71(2):247-254. doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00648-x. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
7
'True Day Case' Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a High-Volume Specialist Unit and Review of Factors Contributing to Unexpected Overnight Stay.高容量专科单位的“真正日间手术”腹腔镜胆囊切除术及意外过夜停留相关因素回顾
Minim Invasive Surg. 2018 Jul 24;2018:1260358. doi: 10.1155/2018/1260358. eCollection 2018.
8
Nondrainage after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis Does Not Increase the Postoperative Morbidity.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎后不引流并不增加术后并发症。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 2;2018:8436749. doi: 10.1155/2018/8436749. eCollection 2018.
9
Role of Routine Subhepatic Abdominal Drain Placement following Uncomplicated Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomised Study.单纯腹腔镜胆囊切除术后常规放置肝下腹腔引流管的作用:一项前瞻性随机研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Dec;10(12):PC03-PC05. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21142.8983. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
10
Effect of ultrasound-guided phrenic nerve block on shoulder pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a prospective, randomized controlled trial.超声引导膈神经阻滞对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后肩部疼痛的影响:一项前瞻性、随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3637-3645. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5398-4. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
有引流与无引流的腹腔镜择期胆囊切除术:一项对照随机试验。
J Minim Access Surg. 2012 Jul;8(3):90-2. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.97591.
4
Drain after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized multicentre controlled trial.择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术后引流。一项随机多中心对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2817-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2252-1. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
5
Surgical management of acute cholecystitis: results of a 2-year prospective multicenter survey in Belgium.比利时一项为期两年的前瞻性多中心调查研究:急性胆囊炎的外科治疗结果。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep;26(9):2436-45. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2206-7. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
6
Is the routine use of drainage after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy justified? A randomized trial.选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术后常规使用引流是否合理?一项随机试验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Mar;21(2):119-23. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0003. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
7
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.《系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目声明》:针对评估卫生保健干预措施的研究的报告规范解释与阐述
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):W65-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
8
Is there a role for drain use in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A controlled randomized trial.在择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术中使用引流管有作用吗?一项对照随机试验。
Am J Surg. 2009 Jun;197(6):759-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.05.011. Epub 2008 Oct 16.
9
Clinical practice. Acute calculous cholecystitis.临床实践。急性结石性胆囊炎。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 26;358(26):2804-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0800929.
10
Clinical significance of drainage tube insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中放置引流管的临床意义:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(6):551-6. doi: 10.1007/s00534-007-1221-x. Epub 2007 Nov 30.