• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性胆囊炎复杂腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的最佳引流管理:一项倾向匹配的比较研究。

Optimal drain management following complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a propensity-matched comparative study.

作者信息

Lee Seung Jae, Choi In Seok, Moon Ju Ik, Yoon Dae Sung, Choi Won Jun, Lee Sang Eok, Sung Nak Song, Kwon Seong Uk, Bae In Eui, Roh Seung Jae, Kim Sung Gon

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Konyang University Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Jun 15;25(2):63-72. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.2.63.

DOI:10.7602/jmis.2022.25.2.63
PMID:35821685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9218398/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was performed to investigate the effect of drain placement on complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy (cLC) for acute cholecystitis (AC).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study reviewed patients with AC who underwent cLC between January 2010 and December 2020. cLC was defined as open conversion, subtotal cholecystectomy, adjacent organ injury during surgery, operation time of ≥90 minutes, or estimated blood loss of ≥100 mL. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to compare the surgical outcomes between patients with and without drain on cLC.

RESULTS

A total of 216 patients (mean age, 65.8 years; 75 female patients [34.7%]) underwent cLC, and 126 (58.3%) underwent intraoperative abdominal drainage. In the propensity score-matched cohort (61 patients in each group), early drain removal (≤postoperative day 3) was performed in 42 patients (68.9%). The overall rate of surgical site infection (SSI) was 10.7%. Late drain removal demonstrated significantly worse surgical outcomes than no drain placement and early drain removal for overall complications (13.1% vs. 21.4% vs. 47.4%, = 0.006), postoperative hospital stay (3.8 days vs. 4.4 days vs. 12.7 days, < 0.001), and SSI (4.9% vs. 11.9% vs. 31.6%, = 0.006). In the multivariate analysis, late drain removal was the most significant risk factor for organ space SSI.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that drain placement is not routinely recommended, even after cLC for AC. When placing a drain, early drain removal is recommended because late drain removal is associated with a higher risk of organ space SSI.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨引流管放置对急性胆囊炎(AC)复杂腹腔镜胆囊切除术(cLC)的影响。

方法

本单中心回顾性研究纳入了2010年1月至2020年12月期间接受cLC的AC患者。cLC定义为中转开腹、胆囊次全切除术、术中邻近器官损伤、手术时间≥90分钟或估计失血量≥100 mL。采用一对一倾向评分匹配法比较cLC中有引流管和无引流管患者的手术结局。

结果

共有216例患者(平均年龄65.8岁;75例女性患者[34.7%])接受了cLC,其中126例(58.3%)接受了术中腹腔引流。在倾向评分匹配队列(每组61例患者)中,42例患者(68.9%)进行了早期拔管(≤术后第3天)。手术部位感染(SSI)的总体发生率为10.7%。对于总体并发症(13.1% vs. 21.4% vs. 47.4%,P = 0.006)、术后住院时间(3.8天 vs. 4.4天 vs. 12.7天,P < 0.001)和SSI(4.9% vs. 11.9% vs. 31.6%,P = 0.006),延迟拔管的手术结局明显比未放置引流管和早期拔管更差。在多因素分析中,延迟拔管是器官间隙SSI的最显著危险因素。

结论

本研究表明,即使在AC的cLC术后,也不常规推荐放置引流管。如需放置引流管,建议早期拔管,因为延迟拔管与器官间隙SSI的风险较高相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f0c/9218398/9adae1f84422/jmis-25-2-63-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f0c/9218398/9adae1f84422/jmis-25-2-63-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f0c/9218398/9adae1f84422/jmis-25-2-63-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimal drain management following complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a propensity-matched comparative study.急性胆囊炎复杂腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的最佳引流管理:一项倾向匹配的比较研究。
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Jun 15;25(2):63-72. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.2.63.
2
Treatment strategies of drain after complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎复杂腹腔镜胆囊切除术后引流的治疗策略
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Jun 15;25(2):51-52. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.2.51.
3
Drainage vs. non-drainage after cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study.急性胆囊炎胆囊切除术后引流与非引流的回顾性研究
J Biomed Res. 2014 May;28(3):240-5. doi: 10.7555/JBR.28.20130095. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
4
Outcomes of Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis in laparoscopic era: A retrospective Cohort study.腹腔镜时代黄色肉芽肿性胆囊炎的治疗结果:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Minim Access Surg. 2013 Jul;9(3):109-15. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.115368.
5
Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for grade II or III acute cholecystitis.经皮经肝胆囊引流后腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术治疗 II 级或 III 级急性胆囊炎。
BMC Surg. 2021 Oct 30;21(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01387-w.
6
Comparison of outcomes of single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis requiring percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage.对于需要经皮经肝胆管胆囊引流术的胆囊炎患者,单切口与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的疗效比较。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020 Oct;13(4):477-480. doi: 10.1111/ases.12774. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
7
Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute and chronic cholecystitis.急性和慢性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007 Jul;17(7):406-9.
8
[Efficacy comparison between laparoscopy and open surgery in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 2 cm using multicenter propensity score matching method].[多中心倾向评分匹配法比较腹腔镜与开放手术治疗直径大于2cm胃胃肠道间质瘤的疗效]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 25;23(9):888-895. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200616-00366.
9
Clinical review of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床综述
Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2012 Feb;16(1):29-36. doi: 10.14701/kjhbps.2012.16.1.29. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
10
Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis according to disease severity: single center retrospective study in Korea.根据疾病严重程度比较单孔与传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎:韩国单中心回顾性研究
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2023 Dec 15;26(4):180-189. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.180.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Robotic-Assisted Cholecystectomy in Acute Care Surgery.急性护理手术中腹腔镜与机器人辅助胆囊切除术的临床结果
JAMA Surg. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1291.
2
Advantages comparison of peritoneal drainage versus no drainage after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术后腹腔引流与不引流治疗复杂性阑尾炎的优势比较:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 16;24(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03500-8.
3
Treatment strategies of drain after complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

本文引用的文献

1
C-reactive protein to albumin ratio predicts difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis diagnosed according to the Tokyo Guidelines 2018.C 反应蛋白与白蛋白比值可预测根据 2018 年东京指南诊断的急性胆囊炎患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的难度。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Jul;15(3):487-494. doi: 10.1111/ases.13035. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
2
Early Drain Removal is Safe in Patients With Low or Intermediate Risk of Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.早期引流管拔除对胰十二指肠切除术后低或中危胰瘘风险患者是安全的:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):e307-e314. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004992.
3
急性胆囊炎复杂腹腔镜胆囊切除术后引流的治疗策略
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2022 Jun 15;25(2):51-52. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2022.25.2.51.
Is routine abdominal drainage necessary for patients undergoing elective hepatectomy? A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
择期肝切除术后患者常规腹部引流是否必要?系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Feb 12;100(6):e24689. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024689.
4
Variation in Drain Management Among Patients Undergoing Major Hepatectomy.肝切除术患者引流管理的差异。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Apr;25(4):962-970. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04610-w. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
5
Peritoneal drainage or no drainage after pancreaticoduodenectomy and/or distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.胰十二指肠切除术和/或胰体尾切除术术后是否行腹腔引流:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):4991-5005. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07293-w. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
6
Prophylactic drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎后预防性引流:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2019 Jun;71(2):247-254. doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00648-x. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
7
Drain Management Following Distal Pancreatectomy: Characterization of Contemporary Practice and Impact of Early Removal.胰体尾切除术后引流管管理:当代实践特点及早期拔除的影响。
Ann Surg. 2020 Dec;272(6):1110-1117. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003205.
8
Abdominal drainage to prevent intra-peritoneal abscess after open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.对于复杂性阑尾炎行开腹阑尾切除术后,行腹腔引流以预防腹腔内脓肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD010168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub3.
9
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos).东京指南 2018:急性胆囊炎的手术治疗:急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全步骤(附有视频)。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):73-86. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.517. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
10
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos).东京指南 2018:急性胆囊炎的诊断标准与严重程度分级(附视频)。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):41-54. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.515. Epub 2018 Jan 9.