Montarras D, Pinset C, Chelly J, Kahn A, Gros F
Department of Molecular Biology, Pasteur Institute, Paris, France.
EMBO J. 1989 Aug;8(8):2203-7. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08343.x.
We have examined the expression of MyoD1, a potential determination factor of myogenic cells, in permissive and inducible C2 myoblasts. These two types of myoblasts exhibit distinct requirements to undergo terminal differentiation. Unlike permissive cells, inducible cells fail to differentiate in the presence of growth medium plus fetal calf serum and require insulin to undergo terminal differentiation. We show that while expression of MyoD1 is constitutive in permissive cells, no trace of MyoD1 transcripts is found in inducible cells at the myoblast stage. In these cells, however, expression of MyoD1 accompanies differentiation. This indicates that MyoD1 may not be required for the maintenance of the myoblast phenotype, and could act as an effector of terminal differentiation in already determined muscle cells. Our results provide new evidence that permissive and inducible cells represent two distinct stages of the progression of determined muscle cells toward terminal differentiation.
我们研究了成肌细胞的潜在决定因子MyoD1在许可型和诱导型C2成肌细胞中的表达情况。这两种类型的成肌细胞在进行终末分化时表现出不同的需求。与许可型细胞不同,诱导型细胞在含有生长培养基和胎牛血清的情况下无法分化,需要胰岛素才能进行终末分化。我们发现,虽然MyoD1在许可型细胞中的表达是组成型的,但在成肌细胞阶段的诱导型细胞中未发现MyoD1转录本的踪迹。然而,在这些细胞中,MyoD1的表达伴随着分化过程。这表明MyoD1可能不是维持成肌细胞表型所必需的,并且可能在已经确定的肌肉细胞中作为终末分化的效应因子发挥作用。我们的结果提供了新的证据,表明许可型和诱导型细胞代表了已确定的肌肉细胞向终末分化进程中的两个不同阶段。