Schlag J, Schlag-Rey M, Dassonville P
Department of Anatomy and Brain Research Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90024.
Exp Brain Res. 1989;76(3):548-58. doi: 10.1007/BF00248911.
Electrical microstimulation was applied at brain sites (thalamic internal medullary lamina complex and superficial layers of superior colliculus) of alert, trained monkeys to evoke fixed-vector saccades. When the stimulation was timed to occur during or after an eye movement, the evoked saccade had a modified trajectory, compensating for, at least, the last portion of the ongoing eye movement. The hypothesis proposed to explain this compensatory effect (Schlag-Rey et al. 1989) is that the electrical stimulation produces a saccade by generating a signal, equivalent to a retinal error, specifying the saccade goal at a fixed location with respect to some eye position (called reference eye position). If the eyes are moving at the time of stimulation, the reference eye position lies somewhere along the trajectory of the ongoing movement. In the present study, we tried to determine this reference eye position, and deduce from it the instant at which the goal was specified. A significant timing difference was observed between thalamic and collicular stimulations. The goal appeared to be referred to an eye position existing at stimulation onset in superior colliculus (SC), and 35-65 ms before stimulation onset in central thalamus. In the latter case, the results suggest that the evoked saccade was aimed at the spatial location that the brain computed by summing a retinal error signal (evoked by stimulation) with the eye position at the time such a signal would have been elicited by a real target. In contrast, the collicular results suggest that the evoked saccade was directed to the retinal location specified by the retinal error signal. The findings imply that if the eyes are not steady while the target position is calculated, signals conveyed in the superficial layers of SC (in contrast to the thalamus) cannot direct the eyes correctly to a visual target.
对清醒且经过训练的猴子的脑区(丘脑内髓板复合体和上丘表层)施加电微刺激,以诱发固定向量扫视。当刺激安排在眼球运动期间或之后发生时,诱发的扫视具有修正的轨迹,至少能补偿正在进行的眼球运动的最后部分。为解释这种补偿效应而提出的假设(施拉格 - 雷伊等人,1989年)是,电刺激通过产生一个等同于视网膜误差的信号来产生扫视,该信号在相对于某个眼位(称为参考眼位)的固定位置指定扫视目标。如果在刺激时眼睛正在移动,参考眼位就位于正在进行的运动轨迹上的某个位置。在本研究中,我们试图确定这个参考眼位,并据此推断指定目标的时刻。在丘脑和上丘刺激之间观察到了显著的时间差异。目标似乎是参照上丘(SC)刺激开始时存在的眼位,而在丘脑中央则是在刺激开始前35 - 65毫秒的眼位。在后一种情况下,结果表明诱发的扫视是针对大脑通过将视网膜误差信号(由刺激诱发)与在真实目标诱发该信号时的眼位相加而计算出的空间位置。相比之下,上丘的结果表明诱发的扫视是指向由视网膜误差信号指定的视网膜位置。这些发现意味着,如果在计算目标位置时眼睛不稳定,与丘脑相比,SC表层传递的信号无法将眼睛正确地导向视觉目标。