• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Lifesource XL - 18计步器,用于在受控和自由生活条件下测量步数。

Lifesource XL-18 pedometer for measuring steps under controlled and free-living conditions.

作者信息

Liu Sam, Brooks Dina, Thomas Scott, Eysenbach Gunther, Nolan Robert Peter

机构信息

a Institute of Medical Science , University of Toronto , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2015;33(10):1001-6. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.981847. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1080/02640414.2014.981847
PMID:25517481
Abstract

The primary aim was to examine the criterion and construct validity and test-retest reliability of the Lifesource XL-18 pedometer (A&D Medical, Toronto, ON, Canada) for measuring steps under controlled and free-living activities. The influence of body mass index, waist size and walking speed on the criterion validity of XL-18 was also explored. Forty adults (35-74 years) performed a 6-min walk test in the controlled condition, and the criterion validity of XL-18 was assessed by comparing it to steps counted manually. Thirty-five adults participated in the free-living condition and the construct validity of XL-18 was assessed by comparing it to Yamax SW-200 (YAMAX Health & Sports, Inc., San Antonio, TX, USA). During the controlled condition, XL-18 did not significantly differ from criterion (P > 0.05) and no systematic error was found using Bland-Altman analysis. The accuracy of XL-18 decreased with slower walking speed (P = 0.001). During the free-living condition, Bland-Altman analysis revealed that XL-18 overestimated daily steps by 327 ± 118 than Yamax (P = 0.004). However, the absolute percent error (APE) (6.5 ± 0.58%) was still within an acceptable range. XL-18 did not differ statistically between pant pockets. XL-18 is suitable for measuring steps in controlled and free-living conditions. However, caution may be required when interpreting the steps recorded under slower speeds and free-living conditions.

摘要

主要目的是检验Lifesource XL - 18计步器(加拿大安大略省多伦多市A&D Medical公司)在受控和自由生活活动中测量步数的标准效度、结构效度以及重测信度。还探讨了体重指数、腰围和步行速度对XL - 18标准效度的影响。40名成年人(35 - 74岁)在受控条件下进行了6分钟步行测试,通过与手动计数的步数进行比较来评估XL - 18的标准效度。35名成年人参与了自由生活条件测试,通过与Yamax SW - 200(美国得克萨斯州圣安东尼奥市YAMAX健康与运动公司)进行比较来评估XL - 18的结构效度。在受控条件下,XL - 18与标准值无显著差异(P > 0.05),使用布兰德 - 奥特曼分析未发现系统误差。XL - 18的准确性随着步行速度减慢而降低(P = 0.001)。在自由生活条件下,布兰德 - 奥特曼分析显示,XL - 18比Yamax每日步数高估了327±118步(P = 0.004)。然而,绝对百分比误差(APE)(6.5±0.58%)仍在可接受范围内。XL - 18在裤兜之间的差异无统计学意义。XL - 18适用于在受控和自由生活条件下测量步数。然而,在解释较慢速度和自由生活条件下记录的步数时可能需要谨慎。

相似文献

1
Lifesource XL-18 pedometer for measuring steps under controlled and free-living conditions.Lifesource XL - 18计步器,用于在受控和自由生活条件下测量步数。
J Sports Sci. 2015;33(10):1001-6. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.981847. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
2
Concurrent validation of the Actigraph gt3x+, Polar Active accelerometer, Omron HJ-720 and Yamax Digiwalker SW-701 pedometer step counts in lab-based and free-living settings.在实验室和自由生活环境中对Actigraph gt3x+、Polar Active加速度计、欧姆龙HJ-720和Yamax Digiwalker SW-701计步器的步数计数进行同步验证。
J Sports Sci. 2015;33(10):991-1000. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.981848. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
3
Accuracy of three Android-based pedometer applications in laboratory and free-living settings.三款基于安卓系统的计步器应用程序在实验室及日常生活环境中的准确性。
J Sports Sci. 2017 Jan;35(1):14-21. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1154592. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
4
Evaluation of the Omron HJ-720ITC pedometer under free-living conditions.在自由生活条件下评估欧姆龙 HJ-720ITC 计步器。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Sep;43(9):1791-7. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318212888c.
5
Measurement of children's physical activity using a pedometer with a built-in memory.使用内置存储器的计步器测量儿童的身体活动。
J Sci Med Sport. 2013 May;16(3):222-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
6
Non-traditional wearing positions of pedometers: validity and reliability of the Omron HJ-203-ED pedometer under controlled and free-living conditions.非传统计步器佩戴位置:在控制和自由生活条件下,欧姆龙 HJ-203-ED 计步器的有效性和可靠性。
J Sci Med Sport. 2012 Sep;15(5):418-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
7
Validity of smartphone pedometer applications.智能手机计步器应用程序的有效性。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Nov 30;8:733. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1705-8.
8
Accuracy of piezoelectric pedometer and accelerometer step counts.压电式计步器和加速度计步数计数的准确性。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017 Apr;57(4):426-433. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06177-X. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
9
Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions.在可控条件下对计步器和加速度计准确性的比较。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 May;35(5):867-71. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000064996.63632.10.
10
Evaluation of activity monitors in controlled and free-living environments.在对照和自由活动环境下活动监测器的评估。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Apr;44(4):733-41. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182351913.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review.基于可穿戴设备评估成年人 24 小时身体活动的自由生活验证研究的质量评价:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jun 9;10(6):e36377. doi: 10.2196/36377.
2
Validity of Consumer Activity Monitors and an Algorithm Using Smartphone Data for Measuring Steps during Different Activity Types.消费者活动监测器的有效性及一种使用智能手机数据测量不同活动类型下步数的算法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 12;17(24):9314. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249314.
3
The validity of activity trackers is affected by walking speed: the criterion validity of Garmin Vivosmart HR and StepWatch 3 for measuring steps at various walking speeds under controlled conditions.
活动追踪器的有效性受步行速度影响:佳明Vivosmart HR和StepWatch 3在受控条件下于不同步行速度时测量步数的标准效度。
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 14;8:e9381. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9381. eCollection 2020.
4
The Validity and Reliability of the Mi Band Wearable Device for Measuring Steps and Heart Rate.小米手环可穿戴设备用于测量步数和心率的有效性与可靠性。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 May 1;13(4):689-701. doi: 10.70252/NJHQ9420. eCollection 2020.
5
Comparison between Mother, ActiGraph wGT3X-BT, and a hand tally for measuring steps at various walking speeds under controlled conditions.在受控条件下,比较母亲、ActiGraph wGT3X - BT和手动计数法在不同步行速度下测量步数的情况。
PeerJ. 2016 Dec 22;4:e2799. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2799. eCollection 2016.
6
Walking as a Contributor to Physical Activity in Healthy Older Adults: 2 Week Longitudinal Study Using Accelerometry and the Doubly Labeled Water Method.步行作为健康老年人身体活动的贡献者:使用加速度计和双标记水法的 2 周纵向研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 7;4(2):e56. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5445.