Suppr超能文献

胆总管囊肿的微创切除:一种可行且安全的手术选择。

Minimally invasive resection of choledochal cyst: a feasible and safe surgical option.

作者信息

Margonis Georgios Antonios, Spolverato Gaya, Kim Yuhree, Marques Hugo, Poultsides George, Maithel Shishir, Aldrighetti Luca, Bauer Todd W, Jabbour Nicolas, Gamblin T Clark, Soares Kevin, Pawlik Timothy M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 May;19(5):858-65. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2722-y. Epub 2014 Dec 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for choledochal cyst (CC) has not been well documented. We sought to define the overall utilization and outcomes associated with the use of the open versus MIS approach for CC. We examined the factors associated with receipt of MIS for CC, as well as characterized perioperative and long-term outcomes following open versus MIS for CC.

METHODS

Between 1972 and 2014, a total of 368 patients who underwent resection for CC were identified from an international, multicenter database. A 2:1 propensity score matching was used to create comparable cohorts of patients to assess the effect of MIS on short-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-two patients had an open procedure, whereas 36 patients underwent an MIS approach. Children were more likely to be treated with a MIS approach (children, 24.0 % vs. adults, 2.1 %; P<0.001). Conversely, patients who had any medical comorbidity were less likely to undergo MIS surgery (open, 26.2 % vs. MIS, 2.8 %; P=0.002). In the propensity-matched cohort, MIS resection was associated with decreased length of stay (open, 7 days vs. MIS, 5 days), lower estimated blood loss (open, 50 mL vs. MIS, 17.5 mL), and longer operative time (open, 237 min vs. MIS, 301 min) compared with open surgery (all P<0.05). The overall and degree of complication did not differ between the open (grades I-II, n=13; grades III-IV, n=15) versus MIS (grades I-II, n=5; grades III-IV, n=5) cohorts (P=0.85). Five-year overall survival was 98.6 % (open, 98.0 % vs. MIS, 100.0 %; P=0.45); no patient who underwent MIS developed a subsequent cholangiocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

MIS resection of CC was demonstrated to be a feasible and safe approach with acceptable short-term outcomes in the pediatric population. MIS for benign CC disease was associated with similar perioperative morbidity but a shorter length of stay and a lower blood loss when compared with open resection.

摘要

背景

关于采用微创手术(MIS)治疗胆总管囊肿(CC)的相关文献报道较少。我们试图明确CC开放手术与MIS手术的总体应用情况及相关结果。我们研究了与CC患者接受MIS手术相关的因素,并对CC开放手术与MIS手术的围手术期及长期结果进行了特征分析。

方法

1972年至2014年间,从一个国际多中心数据库中确定了368例接受CC切除术的患者。采用2:1倾向评分匹配法创建可比的患者队列,以评估MIS对短期结果的影响。

结果

332例患者接受了开放手术,36例患者接受了MIS手术。儿童更有可能接受MIS手术(儿童,24.0% vs. 成人,2.1%;P<0.001)。相反,有任何内科合并症的患者接受MIS手术的可能性较小(开放手术,26.2% vs. MIS手术,2.8%;P=0.002)。在倾向评分匹配队列中,与开放手术相比,MIS切除术与住院时间缩短(开放手术,7天 vs. MIS手术,5天)、估计失血量减少(开放手术,50 mL vs. MIS手术,17.5 mL)及手术时间延长(开放手术,237分钟 vs. MIS手术,301分钟)相关(所有P<0.05)。开放手术组(I-II级,n = 13;III-IV级,n = 15)与MIS手术组(I-II级,n = 5;III-IV级,n = 5)的总体并发症发生率及严重程度无差异(P = 0.85)。5年总生存率为98.6%(开放手术,98.0% vs. MIS手术,100.0%;P = 0.45);接受MIS手术的患者均未发生后续胆管癌。

结论

CC的MIS切除术在儿科人群中被证明是一种可行且安全的方法,短期结果可接受。与开放切除术相比,MIS治疗良性CC疾病的围手术期发病率相似,但住院时间更短,失血量更少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验