Zishiri V, Chihota V, McCarthy K, Charalambous S, Churchyard G J, Hoffmann C J
The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa; School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015 Jan;19(1):87-90. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.14.0372.
Symptom-based screening for tuberculosis (TB) disease is limited by poor performance of symptom screening in several key populations. We tested the hypothesis that pooling sputum from multiple individuals for Xpert(®) MTB/RIF testing would reduce the number of tests required while retaining an acceptable sensitivity, thus allowing the use of Xpert for TB screening.
We compared pooling ratios that would require the least number of assays using Xpert and determined that for a population with a TB prevalence of approximately 3%, a 1:5 pooling ratio is optimal. To evaluate sensitivity, we generated pools of one specimen with known Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture positivity (smear microscopy-positive or -negative) with four culture-negative specimens.
All 20 of the pools generated from a smear- and culture-positive sputum sample were positive using Xpert. Of the 22 pools with a smear-negative, culture-positive sample, we included 17 in the analysis, of which 13 (76%) were Xpert-positive.
Pooling of sputum samples using Xpert achieved reasonable sensitivity and warrants further evaluation of the systematic screening of high TB prevalence populations.
基于症状的结核病筛查在几个关键人群中受症状筛查表现不佳的限制。我们检验了这样一个假设,即汇集多个个体的痰液进行Xpert® MTB/RIF检测可减少所需检测数量,同时保持可接受的灵敏度,从而能够将Xpert用于结核病筛查。
我们比较了使用Xpert所需检测次数最少的混合比例,并确定对于结核病患病率约为3%的人群,1:5的混合比例是最佳的。为评估灵敏度,我们将一份已知结核分枝杆菌培养阳性(涂片显微镜检查阳性或阴性)的标本与四份培养阴性的标本混合。
使用Xpert检测,从涂片和培养均为阳性的痰标本中生成的所有20个混合样本均为阳性。在22个涂片阴性、培养阳性的样本混合中,我们将17个纳入分析,其中13个(76%)Xpert检测呈阳性。
使用Xpert对痰标本进行混合检测具有合理的灵敏度,值得对结核病高患病率人群进行系统筛查作进一步评估。