Suppr超能文献

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)2012年草案指南文件和哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表(C-SSRS)中的自杀意念五种组合能否充分涵盖实践中的所有自杀意念组合?一项案例研究

Do the Five Combinations of Suicidal Ideation in the FDA 2012 Draft Guidance Document and the C-SSRS Adequately Cover All Suicidal Ideation Combinations in Practice? A Case Study.

作者信息

Giddens Jennifer M, Sheehan David V

机构信息

J. Giddens is Co-founder of the Tampa Center for Research on Suicidality, Tampa, Florida; and Dr. Sheehan is Distinguished University Health Professor Emeritus, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida.

出版信息

Innov Clin Neurosci. 2014 Sep;11(9-10):172-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The United States Food and Drug Administration's newest classification system for suicidality assessment anchors suicidal ideation to various combinations of passive suicidal ideation, active suicidal ideation, method, intent, and plan. This is based upon the suicidal ideation categories in the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Although there are 32 possible combinations of these suicidal ideation phenomena, the Food and Drug Administration's 2012 system and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale accommodate six combinations. We use a case study to explore the impact of possible type II errors on suicidality classification posed by not including remaining 26 possible categories.

METHODS

A suicidal subject kept detailed daily records of her experience of suicidality over two separate intervals of eight-months' and nine-months' duration. These records permitted classification of individual events into each of the possible 32 suicidal ideation combinations.

RESULTS

Although only a small percentage of all events of suicidality from either collection period fell outside of the Food and Drug Administration's classification system and the Columbia -Suicide Severity Rating Scale categories, those that were not so categorized constituted a large percentage of the time this subject experienced suicidality. When these two timeframes were aggregated, more than half of the subject's time spent experiencing suicidality fell into the suicidal ideation combinations not captured by the Food and Drug Administration's classification system and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale categories.

CONCLUSION

This case study suggests that type II errors in the Food and Drug Administration's classification system and in the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale categories for suicidal ideation may represent important omissions.

摘要

目的

美国食品药品监督管理局最新的自杀倾向评估分类系统将自杀意念与被动自杀意念、主动自杀意念、方法、意图和计划的各种组合相关联。这是基于哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表中的自杀意念类别。尽管这些自杀意念现象有32种可能的组合,但食品药品监督管理局2012年的系统和哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表涵盖了六种组合。我们通过一个案例研究来探讨不包括其余26种可能类别对自杀倾向分类可能造成的II类错误的影响。

方法

一名有自杀倾向的受试者在两个分别为期八个月和九个月的时间段内,详细记录了她每天的自杀经历。这些记录允许将个体事件分类到32种可能的自杀意念组合中的每一种。

结果

尽管在两个收集时间段内,所有自杀事件中只有一小部分不属于食品药品监督管理局的分类系统和哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表的类别,但那些未被如此分类的事件在该受试者经历自杀倾向的时间中占了很大比例。当将这两个时间段汇总时,该受试者经历自杀倾向的时间中有超过一半属于食品药品监督管理局的分类系统和哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表未涵盖的自杀意念组合。

结论

本案例研究表明,食品药品监督管理局的分类系统和哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表中自杀意念类别的II类错误可能代表着重要的遗漏。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验