• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

负压伤口治疗与传统敷料方法在头颈癌患者游离腓骨皮瓣供区处理中的比较

Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy and conventional dressing methods for fibula free flap donor site management in patients with head and neck cancer.

作者信息

Bach Christine A, Guilleré Lia, Yildiz Sinasi, Wagner Isabelle, Darmon Serge, Chabolle Frédéric

机构信息

Hôpital Foch, Service de Chirurgie ORL et Cervico-faciale, Suresnes, Paris, France.

Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, UFR de Médecine Paris Ouest Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Paris, France.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2016 May;38(5):696-9. doi: 10.1002/hed.23952. Epub 2015 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1002/hed.23952
PMID:25522136
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy in fibula free flap donor site management in head and neck cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study from 2007 to 2013 comparing fibula free flap donor site healing time after conventional bolster dressing or negative pressure wound therapy.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were treated by conventional dressing and 16 patients were treated by negative pressure wound therapy. The mean graft loss rate was higher in the bolster group (37%) than in the negative pressure wound therapy group (19%). The mean total healing time was significantly shorter in the negative pressure wound therapy group than in the bolster group (67 days vs 163 days; p = .02).

CONCLUSION

The use of negative pressure wound therapy for fibula free flap donor site management facilitates early patient mobilization, ensures better graft acceptance, and significantly decreases the healing time.

摘要

背景

评估负压伤口治疗在头颈部癌游离腓骨瓣供区处理中的疗效。

方法

我们进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,比较2007年至2013年间常规加压包扎或负压伤口治疗后游离腓骨瓣供区的愈合时间。

结果

13例患者接受常规包扎治疗,16例患者接受负压伤口治疗。加压包扎组的平均移植失败率(37%)高于负压伤口治疗组(19%)。负压伤口治疗组的平均总愈合时间显著短于加压包扎组(67天对163天;p = 0.02)。

结论

在游离腓骨瓣供区处理中使用负压伤口治疗有助于患者早期活动,确保更好的移植接受度,并显著缩短愈合时间。

相似文献

1
Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy and conventional dressing methods for fibula free flap donor site management in patients with head and neck cancer.负压伤口治疗与传统敷料方法在头颈癌患者游离腓骨皮瓣供区处理中的比较
Head Neck. 2016 May;38(5):696-9. doi: 10.1002/hed.23952. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
2
Association of Bolster Duration With Uptake Rates of Fibula Donor Site Skin Grafts.支撑时间与腓骨供区皮片移植吸收率的相关性研究。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jun 1;146(6):537-542. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0160.
3
Prospective evaluation of a negative pressure dressing system in the management of the fibula free flap donor site: a comparative analysis.前瞻性评估负压引流敷料系统在腓骨游离皮瓣供区创面管理中的应用:一项对比分析。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Oct;139(10):1048-53. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.4544.
4
A comparative prospective study between the outcomes of one-stage Pelnac reconstruction and full thickness skin graft on donor site healing in the radial forearm and fibula flaps.桡骨前臂和腓骨皮瓣一期 Pelna 重建与全厚皮片移植供区愈合结局的对比前瞻性研究。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Sep;125(4S):101949. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101949. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
5
Obliquely-arranged double skin paddles: A novel design to reconstruct extensive head and neck defects with a single fibula or peroneal flap.斜向排列的双皮瓣:一种用单一腓骨或腓骨瓣重建广泛头颈部缺损的新颖设计。
Microsurgery. 2019 Feb;39(2):108-114. doi: 10.1002/micr.30322. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
6
Comparison of outcome of microvascular bony head and neck reconstructions using the fibular free flap and the iliac crest flap.使用游离腓骨瓣和髂嵴瓣进行微血管性股骨头颈部重建的结果比较。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Sep;51(6):514-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
7
Open wound healing of the osseocutaneous fibula flap donor site.腓骨骨皮瓣供区开放性伤口的愈合
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Nov;52(9):861-3. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
8
The fibula osteocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction: a critical evaluation of donor site morbidity.腓骨骨皮瓣在头颈部重建中的应用:供区并发症的批判性评估
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Dec;126(12):1467-72. doi: 10.1001/archotol.126.12.1467.
9
Negative pressure wound therapy in head and neck surgery.负压伤口疗法在头颈部外科中的应用。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Mar-Apr;16(2):120-6. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2013.2163.
10
Reconstruction of large mandibulofacial defects with the composed double skin paddle fibula free flap: a review of 32 procedures.采用组合型双皮瓣腓骨游离皮瓣重建大面积颌面部缺损:32 例回顾。
Laryngoscope. 2014 Jun;124(6):1336-43. doi: 10.1002/lary.24452. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuous negative-pressure wound therapy improves the survival rate of skin grafts and shortens the time required for skin graft survival.持续负压伤口疗法可提高植皮成活率,并缩短植皮存活所需时间。
Skin Res Technol. 2024 Jul;30(7):e13865. doi: 10.1111/srt.13865.
2
Long-term patient-reported donor-site morbidity after free peroneal fasciocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction.游离腓肠浅动脉皮瓣修复头颈部缺损患者供区长期的患者报告结局。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Jul;51(7):3000605231180841. doi: 10.1177/03000605231180841.
3
Impact of Periosteal Branches and Septo-Cutaneous Perforators on Free Fibula Flap Outcome: A Retrospective Analysis of Computed Tomography Angiography Scans in Virtual Surgical Planning.
骨膜分支和鼻中隔皮穿支对游离腓骨瓣手术效果的影响:虚拟手术规划中计算机断层血管造影扫描的回顾性分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 19;11:821851. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.821851. eCollection 2021.
4
Partial and Total Flap Failure after Fibula Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery: Retrospective Analysis of 180 Flaps over 19 Years.头颈部重建手术中游离腓骨瓣部分及完全瓣失败:19年180例瓣的回顾性分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 18;13(4):865. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040865.
5
Complex Wound Management Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation and Dwell Time in a Cancer Care Setting.在癌症治疗环境中使用灌洗和驻留时间的负压伤口治疗进行复杂伤口管理。
Wounds. 2020 May;32(5):118-122.
6
Association of Bolster Duration With Uptake Rates of Fibula Donor Site Skin Grafts.支撑时间与腓骨供区皮片移植吸收率的相关性研究。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jun 1;146(6):537-542. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0160.
7
Osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction options.用于头颈部重建的骨皮瓣:对不同重建方案中供区并发症及患者报告结局指标的重点评估。
Arch Plast Surg. 2018 Nov;45(6):495-503. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.01592. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
8
Miniature Negative Pressure Dressings on Forearm Donor Sites after Radial Forearm Flap Harvest.桡侧前臂皮瓣切取术后前臂供区的微型负压敷料
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Jun 15;6(6):e1838. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001838. eCollection 2018 Jun.
9
Comparison between primary closure and skin grafts of the free fibula osteocutaneous flap donor site.游离腓骨骨皮瓣供区一期缝合与植皮的比较。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Sep;20(3):233-7. doi: 10.1007/s10006-016-0556-3. Epub 2016 Apr 23.