Suppr超能文献

RIPASA评分:一种用于诊断急性阑尾炎的新诊断评分。

RIPASA score: a new diagnostic score for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

作者信息

Butt Muhammad Qasim, Chatha Sohail Saqib, Ghumman Adeel Qamar, Farooq Mahwish

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Kohat.

Department of General Surgery, Military Hospital, Rawalpindi.

出版信息

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 Dec;24(12):894-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the usefulness of RIPASA score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis using histopathology as a gold standard.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY

Department of General Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Kohat, from September 2011 to March 2012.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 267 patients were included in this study. RIPASA score was assessed. The diagnosis of appendicitis was made clinically aided by routine sonography of abdomen. After appendicectomies, resected appendices were sent for histopathological examination. The 15 parameters and the scores generated were age (less than 40 years = 1 point; greater than 40 years = 0.5 point), gender (male = 1 point; female = 0.5 point), Right Iliac Fossa (RIF) pain (0.5 point), migration of pain to RIF (0.5 point), nausea and vomiting (1 point), anorexia (1 point), duration of symptoms (less than 48 hours = 1 point; more than 48 hours = 0.5 point), RIF tenderness (1 point), guarding (2 points), rebound tenderness (1 point), Rovsing's sign (2 points), fever (1 point), raised white cell count (1 point), negative urinalysis (1 point) and foreign national registration identity card (1 point). The optimal cut-off threshold score from the ROC was 7.5. Sensitivity analysis was done.

RESULTS

Out of 267 patients, 156 (58.4%) were male while remaining 111 patients (41.6%) were female with mean age of 23.5 ± 9.1 years. Sensitivity of RIPASA score was 96.7%, specificity 93.0%, diagnostic accuracy was 95.1%, positive predictive value was 94.8% and negative predictive value was 95.54%.

CONCLUSION

RIPASA score at a cut-off total score of 7.5 was a useful tool to diagnose appendicitis, in equivocal cases of pain.

摘要

目的

以组织病理学为金标准,确定RIPASA评分在急性阑尾炎诊断中的效用。

研究设计

横断面研究。

研究地点及时间

2011年9月至2012年3月,科哈特联合军事医院普通外科。

方法

本研究共纳入267例患者,评估RIPASA评分。阑尾炎诊断通过腹部常规超声辅助临床进行。阑尾切除术后,将切除的阑尾送去做组织病理学检查。所生成的15项参数及评分分别为:年龄(小于40岁 = 1分;大于40岁 = 0.5分)、性别(男性 = 1分;女性 = 0.5分)、右下腹(RIF)疼痛(0.5分)、疼痛转移至RIF(0.5分)、恶心呕吐(1分)、厌食(1分)、症状持续时间(小于48小时 = 1分;大于48小时 = 0.5分)、RIF压痛(1分)、肌紧张(2分)、反跳痛(1分)、罗夫辛氏征(2分)、发热(1分)、白细胞计数升高(1分)、尿常规阴性(1分)及外国国民登记身份证(1分)。ROC曲线得出的最佳截断阈值评分为7.5分。进行了敏感性分析。

结果

267例患者中,156例(58.4%)为男性,其余111例患者(41.6%)为女性,平均年龄23.5±9.1岁。RIPASA评分的敏感性为96.7%,特异性为93.0%,诊断准确性为95.1%,阳性预测值为94.8%,阴性预测值为95.54%。

结论

在疼痛情况不明确的病例中,截断总分7.5分的RIPASA评分是诊断阑尾炎的有用工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验